- Follow us on Twitter: @inthefray
- Comment on stories or like us on Facebook
- Subscribe to our free email newsletter
- Send us your writing, photography, or artwork
- Republish our Creative Commons-licensed content

Here's a familiar scenario. You go to the grocery store, get your items and, at the checkout counter, a bagger puts your items into several plastic bags. The bags are never filled to capacity, sometimes only a few items are put into each bag, and usually the bags are doubled. You then head out of the store with many more bags than you need. And when you get home, after you unload your groceries, you'll stuff all these bags into an already large sack of plastic bags from previous visits.

Since plastic grocery bags were introduced in the 1960s, the nation's — as well as the world's — environment is now plagued with this non-biodegradable pollutant. Billions and billions of these plastic bags are consumed each year, only to end up clogging up landfills — never to biodegrade — or littering the streets or disturbing nature's balance by choking wildlife and plugging up waterways. But using paper bags as an alternative is not really the best solution. An excellent article by National Geographic says that making plastic bags is actually less harmful to the environment than making paper bags. Paper bags do biodegrade faster but, if placed in a landfill, can take the same amount of time as plastic, which is thousands of years. Plastic bags are an environmental scourge that have many countries worldwide already addressing the problem.

Bans
Plastic bags have created such an environmental problem that many countries as well as cities now have full or partial bans on the bags. According to reusablebags.com, several African countries as well as Asian countries have banned plastic bags. Australia and the city of Paris are actively moving forward for complete bans on non-biodegradable plastic bags.
Taxing bags
And in some countries that still allow plastic bags, in order to cut down on consumption, customers must actually purchase the bags at the checkout counter. European countries are a forerunner that actively charge their customers for plastic bags, so most savvy consumers carry reusable canvas bags to avoid the charge.
Problem with the United States
The "Live free or die" mantra was started during the War of Independence, and it is still in many ways exactly how we Americans feel we should be able to live. We are a "throw-away" society and feel it is our right to use and throw away as many plastic bags as we want. Taxing people's right to plastic bags also seems contrary to being American since we have it drilled into our heads that taxes are bad. Our resources for landfills and wide-open spaces are also much more abundant than smaller countries such as in Europe, so we don't feel like we're running out of room.
Partial solutions:
Buy and use canvas bags
Some stores give customers a few cents off for each canvas bag they bring in and use instead of plastic bags. Another advantage is that canvas bags hold more objects and are very sturdy which leads to using fewer bags to bring your groceries home in. The advantages of canvas bags also reduce the amount of plastic bags that end up in landfills. Think about it — if you go to the grocery store once a week and use two canvas bags instead of getting say six plastic bags, that's 312 fewer plastic bags consumed by you alone in one year.

Recycling programs
Some grocery stores have bag-recycling programs, where you can drop off your plastic bags at the store before you go shopping. The state of California recently created a bill that makes recycling plastic bags mandatory. There are school programs that let kids team up with stores to help recycle their plastic bags and, by doing so, receive incentives. Reuse your own pile of plastic bags for garbage or storage — the more use you get out of one bag, the less the demand for new plastic bags.
keeping the earth ever green
Just saw Ted Kennedy’s recent speech on the Senate floor, in which he lashes out at Republicans for holding up a vote on legislation to raise the minimum wage. I’ve never seen him so angry before – it’s quite a sight to behold.
Raising the minimum wage isn’t the most targeted way of helping the nation’s working poor families, since most people who work for the minimum wage come from households living above the poverty line (see this report from the Congressional Budget Office for figures). Expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, a tax benefit that makes work pay for low-wage workers, should also receive serious consideration – especially proposals to increase this credit for workers without children, who "pay a strikingly high percentage of their small incomes in federal taxes." That said, a minimum-wage increase would lift hundreds of thousands of working families out of poverty, and economists are divided over whether this legislation would increase unemployment.
Perhaps the most compelling reason to raise the minimum wage is that it’s simply the right thing to do. People who work should get a decent wage for their labor. There’s something morally amiss in a country that has let the value of its minimum wage dwindle amid inflation for the past decade, while the pay of CEOs has risen astronomically. In 1990, the average CEO made 107 times more than the average worker; the gap in 2005 was 411-to-one. When does the greed stop?
UPDATE, 6/11/12: Removed broken links to economists’ views on minimum wage.
Victor Tan Chen Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen
I'm getting back into blogging, after a long hiatus, and my first order of business is to thank solargun, the designer extraordinaire, who provided us with lots of useful advice on the newly revamped site you see before you.
I’m getting back into blogging, after a long hiatus, and my first order of business is to thank solargun, the designer extraordinaire, who provided us with lots of useful advice and help on the newly revamped site you see before you. If you need a laugh, check out solargun’s latest vid on YouTube, linked below. For those of us who have ever used Windows, it’s sure to elicit a painful chuckle (or plaintive tears).
For more videos from solargun, click here, here, or here.
Victor Tan Chen Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen
ITF has received a nomination for the 18th Annual Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) Media Awards — its fourth nomination to date — and will be vying with some of the most respected names in mainstream and alternative journalism, including The Nation, MSNBC.com, and Salon.com. ITF's nomination this year was for Erin Marie Daly's article, "How Many Strikes?"
Sitting in almost 70-degree heat in January a couple weeks ago brings the growing problem of global warming to mind. Global warming is caused by greenhouse gases released into the air via energy consumption and is a major problem that the world must deal with. Americans may think that what they do to contribute to this problem is minimal and there is nothing they can do about it. But because there are 300 million people in the United States and because it is the number one greenhouse gas emitter in the world, each individual is responsible for contributing to this environmental disaster. The impact that you make adds up but there a few steps that you can do to lessen the footprint of your contribution to global warming.
Save energy, consume less, consume green
Energy consumption not only releases carbon-based emissions that contribute to global warming but also creates a deep dent in consumers' wallets. Rising oil prices and tapped-out reserves create a demand that you, the consumers, ultimately pay for. Reducing energy consumption and using alternative clean energy sources help the environment as well as your monthly bills.
Green power
Check with your energy provider to see if there is a green or wind power alternative. Switching over to a clean energy provider is usually as simple as filling out an online form. Green power usually consists of a mix of energy created by low-impact hydroelectric sources and wind power. Natural sources of energy keep the carbon burned by traditional energy suppliers out of the air.

Energy-saving appliances and light bulbs
Buy and use energy-saving appliances like light bulbs, refrigerators, and televisions. The less oil-based energy you consume, the less greenhouse gases are released into the environment. Although energy-saving light bulbs are more expensive than traditional light bulbs, according to The New York Times, they last 10 times as long and use 75 percent less energy. The energy consumers can save with these bulbs has been creating an impact. The retail giant Wal-Mart is aggressively marketing the bulbs as part of their chief executive's commitment to reducing energy consumption. Internationally, under Cuban President Fidel Castro's "energy revolution" program, all Cubans will receive energy-saving appliances including energy-saving light bulbs to replace the old energy-inefficient incandescent ones. Castro's light bulb replacement program has also inspired Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to distribute these energy-saving bulbs to his citizens.

Choose not to use energy
Energy use can also be limited by just not using it—from walking up the stairs in your office building rather than using the elevator to using a drying rack for laundry instead of a clothes dryer.

There are many small, simple things that you can do to lessen your carbon-based energy consumption that leads to global warming. Change a light bulb, walk up the stairs, sign up for green energy. A small change in your habits now will ensure a better environment for those in the future.
keeping the earth ever green
“If there’s an imam on Earth who resembles this one, I will convert to Islam, don the veil and catch the next plane to Mecca.”
— Margaret Wente, writing a somewhat gushing review in the Toronto daily The Globe and Mail of the new Canadian sitcom “Little Mosque on the Prairie.”
The show revolves around a small community of Muslims in a town in rural Saskatchewan, and the series premiere – which drew, by Canadian standards, a staggering 2.09 million viewers – tracked the group trying to set up a mosque in the town parish.
Zarqa Nawaz, creator of “Little Mosque on the Prairie,” explains the concept: “I want the broader society to look at us as normal, with the same issues and concerns as anyone else…We’re just as much a part of the Canadian fabric as anyone else.”