Revenge of the cartoon characters

Don’t pick a fight with a ’toon — especially a ’toon who is syndicated.In an outbreak of cartoon (cartoonish?) anger a tad less frightening than the worldwide protests over the prophet Mohammad cartoons, the…

Don’t pick a fight with a ’toon — especially a ’toon who is syndicated.

In an outbreak of cartoon (cartoonish?) anger a tad less frightening than the worldwide protests over the prophet Mohammad cartoons, the Rev. Al Sharpton recently attacked cartoonist Aaron McGruder for an episode of his animated series, Cartoon Network’s The Boondocks, in which MLK wakes up from a decades-long coma, protests the Bush administration, and utters the N-word. Over the past week, McGruder has struck back with a series of newspaper cartoons devoted to trashing Sharpton for trashing The Boondocks (see here, here, here, and here).

For another take on the flap, check out this column by USA Today’s DeWayne Wickham.

Interestingly, the Washington Post’s David Ignatius mentioned one of these recent Boondocks cartoons in a column yesterday. Ignatius compared the recent Muslim backlash to the Mohammad cartoons to African Americans’ reactions to the N-word. He held up McGruder’s cartoon as an example of how African Americans today can “deal with their anger in less self-destructive ways.” (Did Ignatius realize that the whole point of McGruder’s cartoon was to slam Sharpton for slamming him?) In turn, Workbench criticized Ignatius for his “jaw-dropping racial generalizations.”

Who ever thought that cartoons would become the most serious news of the day, worthy of endless protests, riots, arsons, and testy editorials?

Speaking of news and the funny pages, Doonesbury seems to be at the top of its game again. Since the Iraq invasion Garry Trudeau has been chronicling the tragic absurdities of the war — both abroad and on the home front — mostly through the eyes of Doonesbury character B.D., a veteran of Vietnam and both Gulf Wars, who lost his leg in Iraq and is now (sort of) seeking counseling for post-traumatic stress disorder. B.D.’s helmet has finally come off; Bush’s Mad Martian-wear is still on, though looking a little worse for wear in these post-“Mission Accomplished” days.…

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

Wakes in the Sea

Sing with me: “Knowing we understand nothing,
from an eerie ocean we come, to an inscrutable sea we go.”
And between the two mysteries lies the profound puzzle:
an unfamiliar key locks three coffers.
Light illuminates nothing and the wise man does not teach.
What do words say? And what about the mountain stream?

Wayfarer! Your own footprints
are the path and nothing more.
Wayfarer! There is no path,
the path is made as you walk.

As you walk you make the path,
and looking back
you see a trail you may never tread again.

Wayfarer! There is no path,
only wakes in the sea.

Everything passes and all remains,
but ours is the passing,
passing making paths,
paths over the sea.

translated from the Spanish by Motýlí Voko

“Proverbios y cantares”

XV

Cantad conmigo a coro: Saber, nada sabemos,
de arcano mar venimos, a ignota mar iremos …
Y entre los dos misterios está el enigma grave;
tres arcas cierra una desconocida llave.
La luz nada ilumina y el sabio nada enseña.
¿Qué dice la palabra? ¿Qué el agua de la peña?

XXIX

Caminante, son tus huellas
el camino y nada más;
Caminante, no hay camino,
se hace camino al andar.
Al andar se hace el camino,
y al volver la vista atrás
se ve la senda que nunca
se ha de volver a pisar.
Caminante, no hay camino
sino estelas en la mar.

XLIV

Todo pasa y todo queda,
pero lo nuestro es pasar,
pasar haciendo caminos,
caminos sobre la mar.

About the poem: With these proverbial limericks Antonio Machado forever changed the way Spaniards walk: while caminar is to walk as if passively following a path, andar is to walk in an active sense—to walk making paths.

Jan Vihan is a contributing writer for In The Fray.

 

Firewall is poster child for conglomerate filmmaking

You could probably throw a dart at any executive at any of the major studios in Hollywood and, after screaming in pain, they would say their strategy for making films these days is based on a global marketing initiative.  The stakes have changed, the studios are now all part of media conglomerates, and the new showbiz sales adage has now become “It’s nothing if doesn’t play in Pretoria.”  The new Warner Bros. Pictures major release Firewall, starring Harrison Ford, could be the poster child for this new form of world entertainment.  It is slick, well-crafted, well-acted, full of action and images of the high life of American society, and a flawlessly produced filmed product with nothing to say and no heart and soul.  It is hard to criticize such a film because it is enjoyable to watch with enough thrills and action to keep it interesting but also easily forgotten once you leave the theater.  

Firewall is another of these home/office- invasions-by-criminals-acting-a-lot-like-terrorists movies in recent years taking advantage of the fears brought upon after 9/11.  Harrison Ford plays Jack Stanfield, a top-ranking bank executive who designed the most effective anti-theft system in the industry.  Paul Bettany is Bill Cox, a wolf in Brooks Brothers suit who kidnaps Jack’s family and forces him to break into his own bank and steal money for them, which these days involves electronic transactions to those elusive off-shore accounts.  And just like his President Marshall in Air Force One, Harrison Ford takes matters into his own hands, and the rest you can figure it out on your own.

The supporting cast is first-rate but underused, especially the underappreciated Virginia Madsen, who is relegated to the resourceful wife role.  Mary Lynn Rajskub, a standout on Fox TV’s 24, is relegated to resourceful secretary role, and the always reliable Robert Forster is relegated to the doomed friend role.  British director Richard Loncraine has made some impressive films in the past, such as the compelling modern retelling of Shakespeare’s Richard III and the controversial black comedy Brimstone and Treacle.  Now it seems he’s relegated himself to Hollywood fluff such as the mediocre Wimbledon, also starring Paul Bettany, who trades in his leading man status to take on the bad-guy role so often coddled by actors these days.  Just a note, Bettany will take on another off-color character in director Ron Howard’s blockbuster-to-be The Da Vinci Code later this year.

With so many other films around that deserve audiences, it’s a shame that Firewall will probably bring in big money, globally, of course.  I guess the bottom line dictates that these kinds of films, which deserve their place at the multiplexes, take center stage on America’s world war on box office dominance.  At least it can be said that, although Firewall isn’t the best story out there, it is at least well-made and won’t embarrass us with the folks in Pretoria.  

Firewall opens February 10th nationally.  Released by Warner Bros. Pictures. Running time is 105 minutes.

Rich Burlingham

 

Matter and anti-matter

Some of us in the vast left-wing conspiracy have been asking what’s the matter with Kansas, some what’s the matter with the Democrats, and others go meta and ask what’s the matter with what’s the matter with Kansas.  I want to ask a different question.  What the hell is the matter with the Republicans?

Last week, Pat Roberts, the Senator from Kansas since 1996 and Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote a letter supporting Bush’s illegal wiretapping and agreeing to the preposterous claim that Congress cannot regulate where the President claims war powers, no matter how specious the claim.  In Judiciary Committee hearings on the matter, the Republican members fought hard to ensure that Attorney General Gonzalez would not be under oath.  Orrin Hatch simply walked Gonzalez through the talking points, and Jon Kyl and Charles Grassley affirmed that breaking congressional statutes was an inherent power of the presidency.  Grassley actually admitted to phoning Gonzalez prior to the hearings to help set up his presentation.

Now, to become a Senator, you need to be an ambitious person.  It’s a powerful position and one that is hard to attain.  Think of all the back-stabbing and back-room deals it takes, how many lesser people had to be stomped underfoot.  Watch C-SPAN some time and you’ll see the level of self-importance characteristic of these guys (and they are almost all guys).  The Senate is supposed to be the premier deliberative body in the American government, and so they probably have good reason to think of themselves as important.

What they are doing here is simply handing over virtually unlimited power to the President.  Once they do that, they aren’t going to be too important any more.

The administration asserts that it has constitutional authority to do anything it wishes that is related to national defense.  It gets to determine what is related to defense and what tactics it wants to use, and nobody, not the courts, not Congress, can intervene.  As Dick Cheney says, “We have all the legal authority we need.”  Congress can suggest changes, but “we’d have to make a decision, as the administration.”  Cheney said we’d all just be better off if Congress didn’t know too much about it.  Secrecy and security, you know.

These are not war powers.  Congress did not declare war, and no matter what the rhetorical strategy of the Bush regime, America is not legally at war.

The Republican senators are assisting the administration in a claim that it gets to decide what the Constitution means and who it applies to.  This also means that they can decide about any other laws as well.  If this seems like going too far, the President has asserted the authority to do any searches it sees fit (Fourth Amendment), imprison without due process (Fifth Amendment), hold without access to counsel and ability to confront witnesses (Sixth Amendment), decide on military rules (Article I), and to ignore treaties (Article VI).  That’s just a start.

The Democrats are having a hard time coming up with an effective rhetorical and organizational strategy.  People in Kansas seem to vote in ways counter to their economic interests.  Thomas Frank’s analysis probably understates the importance of symbols.

The Republican party is selling our constitution down the river to a bunch of petty, authoritarian incompetents.  And that really matters.

Pete DeWan

 

Brokeback to the future

First there was the story of the special bond between two cowboys, Ennis del Mar and Jack Twist, who began a forbidden and secretive love affair after one fatef…

First there was the story of the special bond between two cowboys, Ennis del Mar and Jack Twist, who began a forbidden and secretive love affair after one fateful night on a Wyoming mountain. Now comes a film about the special friendship between two other men, separated by vast expanses of time and space, and yet drawn together by love: Marty McFly and Dr. Emmett Brown.

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

The lunatics have taken over the asylum

I can understand why people often shrink back from Lars von Trier’s portrayals of suffering women.  Because arguments in film take the form of characters, setting, and action, it’s a slippery line between say, making arguments about the position of women vis-à-vis society and reenacting those conditions in portrayals that amount to voyeuristic sadism.   Lots of spoilers follow this paragraph, but you seriously should not waste your time with this movie anyway.

Asylum blurs the distinction between historical accuracy and leering, giving us a film that takes the existential paralysis offered to pre-feminism women and turns it into the cinematic equivalent of burning ants with a magnifying glass.  The film follows Stella Raphael (Natasha Richardson) as the restless wife of a doctor in a psychiatric hospital who forms an obsessive attachment to an inmate that tortured and disfigured his own wife but is really good in bed.  She’s a lazily feminist figure, if at all, since her response to the stifling strictures of gender expectations is to find a marginalized man to take care of her and beat her.  One of the creepy aspects to the film was the suggestion that the viewer understand this obsession, partly as a product of her caged freedom and partly because of the absolutely anarchic passions of the orgasm.  Apparently, once you find a woman’s clitoris, there’s just no talking to her.

It’s not just the voyeurism that’s a problem in portrayals of women like this, it’s that the sloppily liberal critique of cultural institutions often seems to have a reactionary undercurrent.  Stella can’t seem to handle even the limited role she’s given, allowing her child to drown in a river because she was off daydreaming about the hot, crazy lug who kicked the crap out of her and almost killed her.  In the end, we see her husband sympathetically, since he only wanted the best for her when he was instructing her on the proper way for a woman to act.  I mean, it’s certainly better to bake cookies than kill your kid and end up the sex slave of a psycho with loose fists.  

As a study of obsession, the movie would be better off not tackling the gender dynamics of the era through Stella’s loathing of her lack of opportunity.  Because then it seems to simply reiterate all kinds of stereotypes of women as irredeemably emotional with masochistic tendencies.  By far the most irritating aspect of Asylum comes from the phony defiant suicide ending.  Yeah, if only every woman who felt unjustly treated by society had killed herself. I hate the defiant suicide.  In terms of statement, it’s more melodramatic but no more effective than mooning someone.  Asylum might, in the wreckage of its plot, have something to say about the lives of intelligent women in an era that kept them anchored in the home.  For me, like Lars von Trier, the movie articulated the suffering too well, becoming more conduit than catharsis.  

 

Sunday masses

An American traveler drops in on a local soccer match in Buenos Aires and barely makes it out alive.

(Rich Tenorio)

Three barricades of riot police secure Barrio Avellaneda, forming three concentric rings over several square blocks. Wearing helmets, hard black boots, full-body bulletproof armor, and armed with shields, shotguns, and bludgeons, they wait on foot, on horseback, on motorcycle. Formidable and expressionless they pose, as area locals sit idly by stoops and storefronts, joking, smoking, drinking away a warm Sunday afternoon in the barrio.

The fanáticos are coming. They come from Núñez, Belgrano, La Boca, running headlong through streets dotted with oil drum fires, punching air, waving flags, chanting to the cadence of fight songs. But the noise they bring is a whisper against the thundering cacophony erupting from within the innermost ring of the police brigade, an Argentine Vesuvius spewing bedlam over a 10-block radius and laying to waste all other priorities for the day. It billows through the neighborhood without mercy, asphyxiating the air and overwhelming the streets, whipping up and down alleyways and in and out of windows. It swells, it charges, it rules: FUTBOL.

They are possessed from the moment they step off the colectivo, for it is Sunday, a day of worship, and they will perform their godly duties at the shrine of El Cilindro, the home stadium of Racing Club soccer team.

Three police checkpoints frisk them, but this is a token gesture at best. A shiv strapped to a shin or a pair of brass knuckles tucked inside underwear can easily pass undetected. Police don’t check these hiding places because they know what everyone else knows: such “minor” weapons are a better form of defense than having nothing at all. The stadium has no security of its own and police refuse to maintain order within its confines as rival fans’ hatred for cops surpasses even their hatred for each other.

A different sort of “frisking” ensues at the stadium gates. Too many people cram into six queues separated by tall metal barriers that lead the fans, like rats in a maze, to the turnstiles. The crowd crushes into the queues while everyone picks everyone else’s pockets, waistbands, and backsides.

Through the turnstiles, up the stairs and into the first level, directly behind the visiting team’s goal stand supporters of River Plate Soccer Club in la tribuna — the cheap seats. There are no actual “seats,” of course; just rows and rows of wide concrete steps upon which to stand, contained on either side by high barbed-wire fences followed by an empty buffer section separating la tribuna from the rest of the stadium.

The game is sold out but this has no meaning here. The stadium claims a capacity of 50,000 but this too is meaningless. Where there is room for one, there is room for 10 — a standard unwritten rule across Latin America. Bodies are packed so tightly that only two positions exist for one’s arms: at one’s side or above one’s head. When newcomers emerge from the stairs to squeeze into the section, when someone attempts to relocate from one spot to another, when someone coughs, sneezes or belches, physical space shifts and the crowd of fans sways accordingly to adjust for the displacement. Nevertheless, there is somehow still enough room to joke, laugh, sing, shout, shove, kick, scream, chant, punch, spit, swear, fight, mob, maim, destroy … 30 minutes to show time, and it’s impossible to move.

Only the strong

La Barra Brava — this is what locals call them. From Argentine slang, the rough translation is “the tough group” or “the strong group.” The colloquial translation is, simply, “hooligans.”

Every team, whether it wants one or not, has a network spanning hundreds, if not thousands, of hooligans, well organized and in contact with one another both inside and outside the stadium. Boca Juniors — Diego Maradona’s old team — supposedly has the worst. But pit any heated rivals against one another, in any divisional playoff, in a country where soccer is religion and both Barras will rise to the occasion.

A part-mafia-part-guerrilla disposition governs their behavior and operations — rumor has it that Racing Club’s Barra chief has a day job as a policeman. They pressure team management not just for free or discounted tickets to games, but exclusive rights to bring normally banned items into the stadium to show support for the team: fireworks, 100-foot banners spanning the upper and lower tiers, flags attached to long blunt objects. Every team’s management knows as well as La Barra Brava that failure to comply with the hooligans’ demands results at the very least in destruction of stadium property. If other teams concede, management certainly cannot afford to be shown up by the opposition, particularly when it comes to fan support.

Today, River Plate hooligans move about la tribuna with a sense of purpose, clearing pathways and readying props like stagehands before opening night.

A squat man is too slow to move out of a tall man’s path and is promptly punched in the face.

An old man leans anxiously against the railing at the stairway exit, deferring to anyone appearing younger and more able. Which means everyone.

A lanky man hobbles in on yellow metal crutches, stops, stands perfectly upright, and removes the rubber caps from the bottoms of his crutches. From within his apparently hollowed-out crutches an arsenal of flare sticks tumbles onto the ground.

Assembly lines of men coalesce spontaneously around him to distribute the flares in classic hub-and-spoke formation.

There isn’t a woman in sight.

A man with a lean and hungry look taps my roommate Josh on the shoulder and says something to him in Spanish. Josh and I had come to the game at the suggestion of our hostel owner, who told us if there was a match to see in Argentina, this was it. Right here is when I understood exactly what our hostel owner meant. Josh leans in and beckons the man to repeat what he said. The man repeats himself. Josh’s Spanish isn’t so great. Josh looks out over the crowd into the next section. Josh’s head whips back as he gets sucker punched.

His assailant leans over him, shouting, gesticulating wildly while Josh crouches, covering his eye. As with any outbreak of violence here, a space opens up for the boys to let off some steam and I immediately step between the two.

Tranquilo,” I say, extending open hands to both of them, making no moves at retaliation and keeping my guard clearly down. “¿Cálma-te…si?

I look down to check on Josh and then my jaw takes the sucker punch, then one from behind, another to my jaw, then my head — Is that three or four people punching me? My mouth fills with blood as a large man grabs me by the collar and drags me down the steps, his friend meanwhile attempting to kick me in the ribs. My feet stumble to regain footing as the acute sting of a just-opened wound shoots out like a spider web across my jaw while my tongue probes the broken flesh of my inner cheek. Other fists, kicks, and sticks strike my back, shoulders, and head. I don’t know who, where, or how many, and I’m really not paying attention anymore — I’m just looking for any way out of this before serious problems begin. Someone throws me against the barrier behind the goal. I spring up as fast as I can and haul ass out of there, crashing, thrashing, lurching my way into the next section. Nobody chases me. I climb up the rows amid concerned stares and two guys stop me.

¿Todo bien?” they ask, one of them putting his hand lightly on my shoulder.

Right — let’s check the damage. Besides the cut in my mouth, my right kneecap feels off. My jeans are torn halfway down my leg and red splotches stain my shins. I run my hand over the golf-ball-sized swelling on the left side of my forehead. My nose and teeth are intact and my wallet is still in my pocket. My eyeglasses have somehow remained on my face. I wipe some more blood from my mouth and sweep my tongue around the piece of flesh that used to be part of my right inner cheek now flapping about inside my mouth. I try biting down — no problems there.

Si,” I reply, “Bien.”

Stay in this section, they say, it’s safer —“Es más seguro.”

The game has yet to begin and I stand four rows down and 20 feet over from the nearest stadium exit. This is actually quite close, but with hundreds of rabid fans filling the space between me and freedom, I’m as good as lying in a mass grave. Even if I were able to make an escape, the police have locked the stadium gates — not so much an effort to keep us in, but to keep out the ticketless anarchists still in the streets.

I have no choice but to stay.

I stand with my feet at shoulder width, bordered on all sides of my body by other bodies. I consider striking up a conversation with my immediate inmates to gain some allies should any more “disagreements” erupt. But the noise from the shouting and singing is so painfully deafening that any conversation, even with a floating head one foot away from mine, is futile.

The players finally enter the arena. Smoke from the fireworks blankets the field like a fog.

Everyone in my section supports the same team, but this is hardly a reason to not fight with each other. Bursts of flying fists become as distracting as a light drizzle or an uninterested mosquito. As the fighters are separated, they kick, they flail, they spit on each other, they spit on the rest of us, and they talk trash, saying just as much with their postures, for body language among men at sporting events is truly international: “¡La concha tuya, cabrón! Pedazo de pelotudo …¡Te voy a romper el orto! Hijo de puta …

During the next 30 to 40 minutes I witness five such exchanges. Then I stop counting.

We shall overcome

In grade school and high school, I played American football, and in college I played rugby. I still remember what it feels like to tackle and be tackled, with and without padding, to be sprawled beneath a human body or two or three or four, to feel a cleated foot kick my forearm that shields my face as I am stuck beneath a ruck. But those situations were child’s play. The pile-ups rarely exceeded six people and my fall was always cushioned by grass and mud.

In la tribuna, when someone falls, they fall on wide steps of cold concrete dirtied with blood, phlegm, beer, urine, cigarette butts, roaches (both the creature as well as the marijuana variety), lone shoes, burnt-out flares, and lost keys. Though I have yet to see it, I’m sure at some point these hallowed stands have also been graced with feces, semen, vomit, and entrails. For we are the visiting team’s supporters. We are not people; we are animals. And like all animals, when we get excited, we lose order.

The ball moves into scoring territory and the overanxious fanatics up behind you want a closer look. One leans on another who leans on another and before you can say, “avalanche,” the leaning turns into pushing, which turns into falling. The only warning you ever get is a split-second recognition of footsteps thundering down the sloping concrete behind you.

This warning comes too late.

By the time the alarm signal saunters across the appropriate synapses of the nervous system, there is already the cumulative momentum of hands, feet, faces, forearms, shoulders, elbows, and knees of not one, two, three, or four, but 70, 80, 90, 100 human dominoes on your back, neck, shoulders, waist, and legs as everybody topples together down the stands toward the goalposts. It becomes a human wave that goes not from side to side but from top to bottom, swelling, cresting, curling, and crashing down onto filthy concrete. This is not college rugby — the best defense here is to go with the riptide while quickly angling toward the sides. Fighting against the flow only achieves the same result as fighting a rip: total submersion.

I maneuver as best I can toward the top of the pile-on but I still have the collective weight of tens, if not hundreds, of people slowly bearing down on my left leg that is somehow tangled with someone’s arm and someone else’s neck. And because there was only a fraction of a second to prepare for this, my left leg will now bend in a way it was not meant to if I do not adjust it promptly. This requires me to remove my right knee from someone’s armpit that is wedged shut, and shove it directly into someone else’s face, while my butt wedges between a spine and an ankle, my elbow into a crotch. Some men moan and shout in pain while muffled cries for help rise up from bodies below.

From this jigsaw puzzle of body parts no one emerges without the help of others. As we pick ourselves up, winces and grimaces flash across our faces. The rest of the body parts are recovered and helping hands and shoulders are lent to those trapped at the bottom. An unfortunate few can no longer walk and are carried toward the stairs, their arms draped across the backs of others. I turn to a couple of people with whom I had been entangled.

Todo bien?” I ask.

We take turns exchanging uneasy handshakes. One of them makes the rounds embracing each of us, as if in Catholic Mass, wishing peace be with us:

Bien,” we all assure each other, nodding with forced smiles, “Todo bien.”

Postscript: Quite a few people who have read this story have asked me whatever happened to Josh. Fortunately, he made it out safely and we met up back at our youth hostel after the game. I’ve also been asked to add something about the hooligan situation in Argentina in the four years since this event took place. I haven’t followed it closely but I do know that an initiative began in 2003 to appease hooligan mayhem and to simultaneously promote Argentina’s struggling writers: small booklets featuring poetry, essays, and short stories were for a time handed out free at soccer matches to give fans something else to do during pre-game festivities and halftime. The effort seemed to work temporarily according to reports immediately after its introduction, but more recent accounts suggest that things may have returned to the ways of old.

 

Not so fun in the sun

It’s an open secret that American tourists regularly head to Cuba to frolic on the white beaches of our closest communist neighbor, but if you happen to go there to protest American foreign policy, …

It’s an open secret that American tourists regularly head to Cuba to frolic on the white beaches of our closest communist neighbor, but if you happen to go there to protest American foreign policy, prepare to be indicted

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

‘Before this, I hadn’t encountered much evil in my life’

I just watched a PBS Frontline documentary, “Sex Slaves,” which provides a much-needed look at a global trade that snares hundreds of thou…

I just watched a PBS Frontline documentary, “Sex Slaves,” which provides a much-needed look at a global trade that snares hundreds of thousands of women around the world. The documentary is incredibly engrossing, centered around the story of a husband searching for his pregnant wife, Katia, a Moldovan woman who was sold into slavery by an acquaintance while traveling in Turkey. Katia and many other women from impoverished countries are duped with offers of legitimate work, kidnapped, and held against their will. They are typically forced to have sex with eight to 15 men a day and beaten regularly. (This kind of sex trade does not just happen in far-off lands: About 20-25,000 of these women have ended up in the United States, says one expert interviewed in the documentary.) Another former sex slave, Tania, from Ukraine, went to Turkey in the hope of getting a nanny job; she was sold to a violent pimp and worked as a prostitute for 10 weeks under the threat of violence until a customer bought her freedom. “Before this, I hadn’t encountered much evil in my life,” Tania says. “But when I got there I couldn’t believe places like that actually exist in this world. I thought I’d find at least one kind person, or that one of those pimps would set me free.” In Turkey, the police officers collude with sex traffickers; some are even customers.

The scariest thing is that Tania chooses to go back to her life as a prostitute. Her family lives in utter poverty in Chernobyl, Ukraine; they cannot afford surgery for Tania’s severely ill younger brother. Shortly after winning her freedom, Tania decides to return to Turkey and sell herself — this time willingly — to raise the money. It may seem like a story taken from a dreary historical novel like Memoirs of a Geisha or Les Misérables, but this is the reality for hundreds of thousands of women, trapped in a modern-day nightmare where poverty and lawlessness meet human lust and cruelty.

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

Is the Super Bowl the only collective conscious we have left?

America has become a fractured nation.  What I mean is that nowadays it is rare when the collective conscious of America is drawn to a single moment in time.  Going back forty, fifty, sixty years, radio and television broadcasts would bring people together to listen or watch significant events.  Presidential speeches, news and sports, and the like would rivet a nation. The homeless even would find a radio or TV set in a store window to catch FDR declaring war, Babe Ruth hitting a homerun, or men landing on the moon.  Even the presidential voting process is fractured as so many people vote absentee or not at all.  

September 11th was one of those few current events that affected us all, and we all communally mourned and feared for what would happen next.  For broadcasting, the advent of cable and satellite has diminished the ability of TV and radio to be a means of bringing a whole country together. No longer do we all tune to Uncle Walter or Ed Sullivan to watch the same exact occurrence with our neighbors around the country.  I believe that the collective consciousness helped build us into the super power we are today, and the loss of it can only make it harder to keep that power going into an uncertain future.

An interesting observation finds that the only non-disaster event in this day and age to be able to collectively bring together the people of the United States, and even the entire world, is the Super Bowl, seen in more than 200 countries around the globe.  This past Sunday, all kinds of people tuned into an American football game, and for a few hours the cultural zeitgeist was morphed into one.  The Super Bowl has become less a sporting event and more a kind of national holiday where we all gather together to celebrate being Americans — and, for those in foreign lands, to sneak a peek at a culture that prides itself on being a collection of vastly different individuals fused together by ideas of freedom and liberty for all.  It used to be exploration, wars, and other political events that brought us together.  Now it’s men dressed in funny uniforms running at each other like mountain goats chasing after an odd-shaped ball.  And what makes it all even stranger is the fact that most people don’t even tune into the broadcast to watch the game but to watch the commercials.  We have become a Wal-Mart culture where commerce is everything.

As a television program, the Super Bowl broadcast is overly produced, stuffed with such a vast array of fluff that it’s almost a parody of itself.  The teams are so over-analyzed and scrutinized beforehand that even a Mongolian sheepherder knows the point spread and what each quarterback eats for breakfast.  The actual game is always hit or miss, just like any sports contest.  Some games are close and offer on-field thrills to rival any event, and others are boring blowouts where you can almost hear a collective yawn from coast to coast.  Super Bowl XL happened to be better than most and at least made it to the final few minutes before the outcome was known.  But these days you don’t only judge the show on the merits of the game but on the commercials that run between plays.  There is even a show the night before previewing the commercials that will run the next day, so there isn’t even any surprise on that front which makes them as anticlimatic as the game.  

Now that I brought up the commercials, I guess I need to reveal my top faves in terms of entertainment and salesmanship.  I will say that this year there were no Apple 1984 spots to knock you off your chair or anything coming close.  There were a few that made me laugh out loud and a couple that even watered the eyes a tad, but as a group I would give this year’s crop a C+.  The ones I didn’t particularly care for were Coca Cola Company’s Full Throttle spots that were obviously trying to get those NASCAR aficionados to drink its new Red Bull knock-off.  I got tired of the Blockbuster and Pizza Hut spots because they kept coming and coming, and all the effects-driven spots all kind of morphed together.  Budweiser, the event’s leading advertiser, scored big with a couple of continuing Clydesdale spots.  A touching one where a young colt gets a little help pulling the beer wagon, and the streaking sheep that invades the horses’ own Super Bowl game were both cute and funny.  Ameriquest scored points with its airline passenger who winds up in a compromising position after a bit of turbulence, as did the Leonard Nimoy spot where the Star Trek veteran uses Aleve to help him give the seminal Vulcan greeting to a bunch of geeky fans.  Add ABC’s inventive “Addicted to Lost” promo and the Burger King Busby Berkeley build-a-burger revue, and those were pretty much the top commercials this year.  Oh, and for some reason the “Cheers from the world” spot from herestobeer.com made me choke up a little.  I guess if anything in this world could bring us all together, Rodney King not withstanding, we could do a lot worse than a mug of beer.  

You can view Super Bowl ads at either Google or at NFL.com.

Rich Burlingham

 

Defying gravity

issue banner

This February, ITF explores what life is like on the other side of normal — what happens when everyday assumptions and habits are ripped away. Though sometimes frightening and often involuntary, change can also lead to transcendence, as it does in this month’s issue.

We start by Taking Flight when Kekla Magoon explores the virtues of fleeing a bad situation by remembering her own decision to step off the path to medical school. Next, in a short story by CS Perryess, The best of it, a young girl escapes the dispiriting world of homelessness by creating her own imaginary home out of the chaos.

In A long walk to work, photojournalist Dustin Ross depicts a  surprisingly cheery New York in the midst of the transit strike. And in Slamming it, Erin Marie Daly documents the post-war Bosnian sitting volleyball team’s mercurial rise to national standings.

Finally, in Sunday masses, local sports pride reaches a bloody but exhilarating extreme when Ulysses de la Torre attends a soccer match in Argentina. Later this month, and across the pond, Courtney Traub observes France grappling with its colonial past. Amidst the remnants of racism, the nation shows some signs of rising to the occasion.

Our column this month, alas, is not about transcendence, but about its opposite: having feet of clay. Former Newsday reporter Valerie Burgher, in The anti-pleasure principle, reminds us of the cardinal sins and how some of our most outspoken moralists have fallen afoul of the straight and narrow without learning any lessons.

Nicole Leistikow
Managing Editor
Baltimore

ALSO: InTheFray needs your input! Later this spring we will begin publishing a department devoted to interviews with activists. We’re looking to showcase a diverse array of activists and activism, broadly defined.

If you know of anyone who you think would be a worthy interview subject, please email us at activists-at-inthefray-dot-org with the person’s name, a couple sentences about the person and why you think s/he’d be such an interesting interview subject, and, if possible, how to get in touch with the person. Thanks for your help!

personal stories. global issues.