Industry strong-arms breastfeeding campaign

This is a story about two boys, brothers, born of the same mother, the same father, in the same city, the same hospital, and according to their father, the same bed. These brothers share a love for roughhousing with each other and any comers. You can find them challenging each other in kickball and arguing over which restaurant to share a meal or who can talk the loudest. Together they have moments of mutual satisfaction laced with more than just a few conflicts.

One brother amazed his pediatrician when at eight months he showed up in his office, an overwhelmed mom and dad at his side. "What seems to be the problem?" the standard line given to parents who do not have a clue. "Well, he has been crying all morning, we’ve tried everything, and don’t know what is wrong." "Well, how does he act when he isn’t feeling well?" replies the pediatrician, with a what-a-bunch-of-morons nod of his head. Mom glances at dad, who glances right back. "You mean sick? He’s never been sick." Now the doctor looks up, interest peeked. A never-been-ill eight-month-old? Who knew such a child existed? First-time parents, we thought baby Tylenol was for teething.

The second time around, we learned that weeks-old babies could develop ear infections, that visits to the doctor could become routine, that asthma is a serious thing. Two brothers, one so healthy he dares fate to cast an illness his way, the other tied to nebulizers, graduating to inhalers, plans filed with the nurse’s office, medicine and its accompaniments always kept on hand. Two boys, one healthy, one less so, one breathing clearly, one listening for that little rattle, one confident in his health, one anxious that his medicine might be left behind. One breastfeed, one not.

While health professionals have promoted the benefits of breastfeeding for a number of years, the actual number of women who choose to breastfeed has declined. Common sense would suggest that, as women become aware of the benefits of breastfeeding, at least some increase would emerge. So why the decline?

The Washington Post National Weekly Edition reports on one possibility, government strongarmed by industry. According to their investigation, the infant formula industry hired guns — Clayton Yeutter, agriculture secretary under George H.W. Bush and Joseph Levitt, former director of the Food and Drug Administrations’s Center for Food Safety and Nutrition, which regulates, you guessed it, infant formula — to protect their interests when faced with new, viable research supporting breastfeeding.

As the health and science community completed research indicating that non-breastfeed babies are up to 250 percent more likely to suffer respiratory diseases, the Federal Office on Woman’s Health geared up for a hardhitting ad campaign, featuring a baby bottle nipple attached to the end of an asthmatic inhaler as well as a syringe-topped baby bottle. Images designed to wake up moms to the possible consequences of choosing formula over breast. The promotion of consequences versus benefits is not new to government advertising — think Ad Council campaigns on drunk driving — yet it is an approach, when taken with breast versus bottle feeding, that leaves behind the idea that both are equally healthy and simply a lifestyle choice.

In a "Dear Tommy" letter to former HSS secretary Thompson, Yeutter used mom’s guilt to promote the toning down of the proposed ad campaign. After all, he asked, "Does the U.S. government really want to engage in an ad campaign that will magnify that guilt?" Well, while I can’t speak for all of the moms out there who have chosen to use formula over breastmilk, I can tell you what I think. Yes, I feel guilty that I didn’t endure the painful tearing of my nipples (onionskin comes to mind) when my youngest had difficulty latching. Yes, I feel guilty that I let the fact that I wanted to return to work influence my decision to bottle feed. Yes, I am guilty of putting my own needs over my child’s. I am reminded of that choice every day when I open the kitchen cabinet, the glove compartment of my car, the upstairs closet, and bits of my son’s asthmatic life appear.

I am also frustrated with a government that would promote immediate dollars over the health of its children. Of course encouraging moms to breastfeed means not only damaging the infant formula industry, it means supporting moms in the workplace. It could mean longer paid (what a concept) maternity leave, on-site childcare, or alternative workplace locations. Like a line of tipped dominoes, a hardhitting ad campaign on the consequences of not breastfeeding starts alone, only to knock its universe on its backside.

 

Eating meat worse for environment than driving or flying

According to a United Nations report published last November, animal agriculture emits more global-warming gases into the air than does transportation. And greenhouse gases aside, the report also shows how livestock degrade and pollute land and water sources. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options is a free, downloadable report that explains in great detail how the animal agriculture industry hurts the environment, which in turn makes it clear that eating meat products helps to contribute to the Earth’s demise. In the summary and conclusion chapter, the authors broke down their findings:

Economic, social, and health impact:
Although the livestock industry accounts for less than two percent of the world’s gross domestic product (GDP), its output is around 40 percent of all agricultural products. And in developed nations animal agriculture makes up 50-60 percent of all agricultural output. More important than its output, raising livestock provides livelihoods for people in developing countries, which is sometimes the only viable way the poor can live by. It has been shown that modest consumption of meat and dairy products can be beneficial for health. But the overconsumption of the same are to be blamed for obesity and its health-related problems, most notably in developed nations.

Environment, air, and water impact:
The animal agriculture industry takes up almost 30 percent of the Earth’s usable land space. Many countries, such as Brazil, have clear-cut, massive amounts of once abundant forests for the purpose of installing cattle farms. And the agricultural land used to raise feed for these cattle has been polluted by pesticides and fertilizers, as well as degraded by soil erosion and water pollution. The livestock sector is also a "key-player" in water use as well as depletion, which is mostly used to irrigate the crops used for feed. Grazing livestock disrupt natural chemical patterns in soil as well as destroy wild animal habitats. Ironically livestock consume more than 77 million tons of "human edible protein" as opposed to the 58 million tons the animals actually contribute to the food stream. The major pollutants from this industry include animal waste, hormones, and antibiotics, as well as chemicals used to produce leather. In addition, animal agriculture contributes 18 percent of the total effect of global warming. And in terms of greenhouse gases, livestock overall contribute 9 percent of carbon dioxide, a whopping 37 percent of methane gas, and 65 percent nitrous oxide.

Solutions:
Unless changes are made and implemented immediately, the report states bluntly that "environmental damage will double." Some solutions include taxing livestock companies for environmental damage as well as creating incentives for environmental upkeep. Implementing new technologies at a fast pace could create higher productivity and therefore impact the environment less. Requiring industrial livestock to be located in less concentrated areas where it’s easier to dispose their waste to neighboring croplands is another recommendation.

The impact of animal agriculture to the environment is already apparent, so being able to manage it in a way that benefits the producers, the consumers, and the environment is a problem that needs to be solved immediately. As a consumer, eating less meat is a small way to help.

keeping the earth ever green

 

Birth control facts

I received a much-forwarded email last week that set off my BS radar:

In case you know someone young enough that uses birth control and for the younger ones.

PASS THIS ON EVEN IF YOU DO NOT USE IT.

Recently this past week, my cousin Nicole Dishuk (age 31…newly grad student with a doctoral degree about to start her new career as a doctor…) was flown into a nearby hospital because she passed out.

They found a blood clot in her neck and immediately took her by helicopter to the ER to operate. By the time they removed the right half of her skull to relieve the pressure on her brain, the clot had spread to her brain causing severe damage.

Since last Wednesday night, she was battling…they induced her into a coma to stop the blood flow. They operated 3 times.

Finally, they said there was nothing left that they could do. They found multiple clots in the left side of her brain…the swelling wouldn’t stop, and she was on life support.

She died at 4:30 yesterday. She leaves behind a husband and 2-year-old Brandon and 4-year-old Justin..The CAUSE of DEATH — they found it was a birth control she was taking that allows you to only have your period 3 times a year…They said it interrupts life’s menstrual cycle, and although it is FDA-approved, shouldn’t be. So to the women in my address book — I ask you to boycott this product and deal with your period once a month — so you can live the rest of the months that your life has in store for you.

*Please send this to every woman you know — you may save someone’s life…Remember, you have a CYCLE for a reason!

FYI…The name of this new birth control pill is Lybrel.

If you go to Lybrel.com, you will find at least 26 pages of information regarding this drug.  
The second birth control pill is, Seasonique. If you go to the website of Seasonique.com, you will find 43 pages of information regarding this drug.  

The warnings and side effects regarding both pills are horrible.

Please, please forward this information to as many daughters AND sons, co-workers, friends, and relatives. Several lives have already been changed.

Being cynical and smelling a rat, I immediatly started searching. The very first result on Google about Nicole Dishuk leads to a site about urban legends. Turns out, Nicole Dishuk did die a year ago  of a stroke. Any other details about the cause of her death have been sealed as confidential. But note how the email states, in bold letters, "CAUSE OF DEATH." She was on this type of birth control pill, but no one has said, let alone confirmed, that the pill caused or was related to her sad, untimely death.

Another misleading bit from the email is that it lists how many pages of info about each drug you’ll find on the site. Of course you will find info  you will find that from any pharmaceutical site  they are required to disclose all drug facts. It doesn’t say, however, that you’ll find 43 pages of info about how deadly it is. It just says 43 pages.

There are side effects (and even related deaths) for every single prescription drug on the market. So the next time you get one of these ominous, meant-to-scare email stories, think twice before you forward it.

In related news: Birth control pill may cut cancer risk (study)
LONDON (Reuters) — Taking the contraceptive pill does not increase a woman’s chance of developing cancer and could even reduce the risk of getting the killer disease, a major British medical study showed on Wednesday.

Thank you medical science.

And now I’d like to thank common sense in the legal system:

A doctor has no duty to tell a woman considering an abortion that her embryo is an "existing human being," a unanimous New Jersey Supreme Court ruled Wednesday, averting a trial over when human life begins. The decision, citing past rulings, said the court "will not place a duty on doctors when there is no consensus in the medical community or among the public" on when life begins. The 5-0 Supreme Court ruling reversed a unanimous ruling by a three-judge appeals panel.

"No concensus in the medical community…unanimous ruling…" If only facts and science were enough, as in other countries, for our politicians to leave our bodies and our rights alone. It would help if, also like other countries, we could keep religious extemists out of our courtrooms and hospitals.

 

Book excerpt and radio interview, plus updated schedule

AlterNet published an excerpt of my book, The Missing Class, and here is a link to a radio interview I did last week. An updated list of interviews and book readings follows.

AlterNet published an excerpt of my book, The Missing Class, and here is a link to a radio interview I did last week on "Sound Off With Sasha," a news program on an NPR affiliate in Southwest Florida.

The Nation has an interview with my co-author, Katherine S. Newman, regarding the book. 

An updated list of interviews and book readings follows.

 

RADIO/TV INTERVIEWS

The Progressive Forum on KPFT-FM (Pacifica Houston). Thursday, Sept. 13, 8–8:30 p.m. Eastern, 7–7:30 p.m. Central. This interview will be live.

The Exchange (New Hampshire Public Radio). Tuesday, Sept. 18, 9–10 a.m. This interview will be live.

Marketplace (American Public Media). Tuesday, Sept. 18, 11-11:20 a.m. This interview will be taped with air date to come.

Leonard Lopate Show on WNYC (NPR New York). Tuesday, Sept. 18, 12-12:40 p.m.

Tavis Smiley Show (PRI). I’m not sure about the broadcast date. This interview will be taped on Wednesday, Sept. 19, 11:30–11:45 a.m.

Late Mornings on KVON Radio (Napa, Calif.). Monday, Sept. 24, 11:30 a.m. Eastern, 8:30 a.m. Pacific. This interview will be live.

Joy Cardin Show on Wisconsin Public Radio. Wednesday, Sept. 26, 9-10 a.m. Eastern, 8-9 a.m. Pacific. This interview will be live with call-ins.

Radio Times on WHYY Radio (NPR Philadelphia). Wednesday, Sept. 26, 10–11 a.m. This interview will be live.

Bob Edwards Show on XM Satellite Radio. I’m not sure about the broadcast date. This interview will be taped in studio on Monday, Oct. 1, 9-9:45 a.m.

Diane Rehm Show on WAMU Radio (National NPR). This interview will be live with call-ins and will be syndicated to 100 public radio stations across the country. Monday, Oct. 1, 11 a.m.-12 p.m.

To the Contrary on PBS. Broadcast dates will vary. The interview will be taped on Monday, Oct. 1, 3-3:30 p.m.

Midmorning with Kerri Miller (Minnesota Public Radio). Wednesday, Oct. 3, 11 a.m.–12 p.m. Eastern, 10-11 a.m. Central. This interview will be live with call-ins. 

 

ARCHIVED INTERVIEWS 

Thom Hartmann Show on KPOJ Radio (Portland, Ore.). Wednesday, Aug. 29, 10-10:15 a.m. Eastern, 7-7:15 a.m. Pacific. Here is the archive of the interview.

Sound Off With Sasha on WGCU/WMKO-FM (public radio, Southwest Florida). Friday, Sept. 7, 2-2:30 p.m. Here is an archive of the interview.

 

BOOK READINGS

Washington D.C., Monday, Oct. 1, 12:30-2 p.m.: The New America Foundation/Workforce and Family Program, 1630 Connecticut Ave NW, 7th Floor.

Cambridge, Mass., Friday, Oct. 5, 7 p.m.: Harvard Coop Bookstore, 1400 Massachusetts Ave., reading and signing.

Cambridge, Mass., Wednesday, Dec. 5, 7 p.m.: Cambridge Forum, First Parish (Unitarian Universalist), 3 Church Street.

New York City, Monday, Dec. 10, 6:30 p.m.: New York Public Library, 455 Fifth Avenue, across the street from central research library.

 

PRINT ARTICLES

AlterNet.org: Excerpt (September 6, 2007)

The Nation: Interview (August 13, 2007 issue)

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

The $20,000 question

As a child I remember my father telling me about the summer he worked as a brick layer to earn money for college. As the son of a Holiday Inn hostest, college was tantamount to reaching for the stars. By summer’s end, earnings counted, he realized that he was several hundred dollars short of the tuition fee. Back in those days, there were no such things as a Pell grant or guaranteed student loans; there was, however, something called a GI Bill. Designed for soldiers returning from World War II, the GI Bill allowed lower-income persons the opportunity to get their foot in the corporate door. My father looked over the services and decided a few years in the Air Force would be worth a college degree.

I am reminded of this conversation with my father as I read this week’s Washington Post National Weekly Edition, which discusses the Army’s lastest recruitment incentive. The $20,000 "quick-ship" program, which began in late July, encourages new recruits to report to basic training by the end of September. While Army recruiters are stressing that the bonus is the last thing they discuss with potential enlistees, $20,000 on the table is no small sum.

Part of the military family since birth, yes, my father did graduate from college only to find that the Air Force was the corporate he was looking for, I wonder if these individuals really know what that $20,000 buys them. Opportunities to travel the world, free healthcare, money for education, a steady paycheck, and the privilege of serving their country during a time of war is the typical spiel that crosses one’s mind when discussing the benefits of military service. 

Although the war against terrorism has underscored the Army’s true purpose, I still sense a fascination among civilians regarding the “clubbishness” of the military. One only has to tune into Lifetime’s Army Wives to get Hollywood’s version of the rank and file. While some of it rings true, the episode with the stepfather chasing his stepsons around the pool during retreat brings a smile to the lips; it is, as is most of television, a caricature of the reality it represents. Beyond the 12-plus hours a day, the less-than-ideal working conditions, possible monotony, all of which can be said of any number of jobs, lies the possibility of another world: one that may include the chance to lead others, find a passion, and finally move into another social strata. Opportunities aside, the military also offers the chance to miss your child’s birth, to forego lending your sibling a helping hand, or the responsibility of reassuring a child that her father will do everything to keep himself safe, knowing that the father is a POW somewhere in Iraq.

So what’s the difference between my father’s free college education and a 20,000 recruitment bonus? Is it the idea that a college education points towards the future, whereas $20,000 brings to mind bills labeled past due, flatscreen TVs, and, if one plays her cards right, maybe a new car? I realize in a world overwhelmed with things, the temptation to own is reaching epidemic heights. Using material wealth to define one’s self is nothing new; after all, a lot of those GIs used their college diplomas to move solidly into white-collar America. I suppose what makes the $20,000 bonus so crass is that a war is going on, one that is filling caskets, occupying hospital beds, and ending relationships. Yes, the military life has been good to me. My children have been to 33 states at last count, I have been able to take a break from my career to care for my child’s special needs, the free healthcare has been an absolute blessing, and yet, I just can’t get the sight of $20,000 and displaced limbs out of my mind.  

 

The game of BS

In middle school, when it was too cold outside, my friends and I would find entertainment with a card game during recess. Our favorite game to play was Bullshit. The game provided an outlet where we could freely lie and deceive in the sake of winning, essentially, one-up one another.

But as I grow older and survey my surroundings, it seems that my generation is continually playing a game of Bullshit. Our parents lived in an age when news outlets served as the herald of undisputed truth. We, however, have grown up in an era where information must be taken with a grain of salt. As gossip is continually packaged and spun to make news, we are forced to consort other avenues in the pursuit for truth.

Much of my generation, though, is reluctant to embark on this journey. Complacent in relying on parents to dictate our lives, we don’t question established mores. Instead we spend our time struggling with our self-inflicted need to measure up to our peers. We are a generation that is more concerned with appearing to have figured it all out, rather than actually doing so. We lack the necessary perspective to decipher what is true and, consequentially, what is real.

It is perspective, no matter how right or wrong, that paints many different portraits of truth and reality from which we can freely pick and choose. Without perspective, we refrain from questioning the hallow columns holding up the society in which we live. Instead, we build to it by adding layers of superficiality through narrow perceptions that remain unquestioned. Without a clear idea of what makes up truth and reality, however, we walk around wearing a shroud of cynicism.

And the Internet only encourages and intensifies this shallow world. Despite our skepticism and discontent for the world around us, though, we’ve become a new, extreme set of self-absorbed egomaniacs. Online social networks, like Facebook and MySpace, have made it easier than ever to draw attention to every petty detail of life via updated profile or uploaded picture. Life is instantly validated with every new endeavor alerted to our social network via News Feed.

This quick and easy process of bragging has increased selfishness while allowing us to further evade perspective. It was once necessary to physically interact with others in order to boast. The Internet, though, has made this connection process obsolete. At least when a friend told of a new job or boyfriend in person, subtle body language could justify or negate our innate skepticism. Now, through the powers of technology, a simple congratulatory wall posting hides an ever-growing desire to yell bullshit.

 

Wordplay

With everything from the Internet to the September 11 terrorist attacksputting new words in our mouths and on our computer screens — think enemy combatant or emoticon — the 21st century is shaping up to be one of linguistic and cultural change.

In this issue of InTheFray, we consider the state of language in ourcurrent milieu. We begin with a topic that captured media attention inthe run-up to the 2004 election: sexual orientation. ITF contributor Erin Marie DalyLove Won Out,”a Boston conference produced by the Christian powerhouse Focus on theFamily, and discovers that the language of the ex-gay movement(“struggle against temptation”) does not quite triumph in the attemptto “convert” gays to heterosexuality.attends “

Meanwhile, Pam Lee and Beth Beglin jumped at the chance to marry last weekwhen an Iowa judge briefly defied the language of the law to say thatmarriage wasn’t just between a man and a woman. Now their application —and the legalese of love — is pending.

We then journey to Japan where Hauquan Chau teaches the f-word and learns how empowering English can be in this Asian country. Unfortunately for the narrator in Jim Curtiss’ short story Change me, English is not quite as intimidating in Seville, Spain, where high school Spanish classes don’t prepare one to do business.

In Cornerless city, former ITF assistant editor and native New Yorker Michelle Chen tries to make sense of Cairo, a city bereft of straight lines and angles. And poet Pamela Uschuk reflects on life elsewhere in the Middle East, when she considers the deception of the language of liberation in Words on Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Last, but far from least, is a stunning photo essay by award-winning photographer and ITF advisory board member Stephen Shames. In Dads,Shames reconsiders the value of fatherhood and examines the differentways that minority and poor fathers are perceived in society.

Also, we are excited to announce that InTheFray Magazine is beginning its annual Donor Drive. The past year has been an exciting time for InTheFray — we launched a new site at inthefray.org,our writers received national awards for excellence, and we expandedour content with a new section devoted to activist interviews and aneclectic assortment of articles from five continents. While we havemade great strides in 2006-2007, we need your help to continueproviding high-quality writing and photography on topics that matter.In the coming year, we plan to broaden our pool of talent by increasingthe compensation paid to our contributors and staff. We will also raiseawareness of the magazine through targeted marketing and advertising.We hope that you will join us in our mission to inspire conversationsabout identity and community, foster tolerance and unity,and help society come closer to a vision of justice, transparency, andopportunity for all people. Please support our efforts and visit inthefray.org/donate to make a donation.   

Laura Nathan

Editor

Buffalo, New York

 

Teaching the f-word

200709_interact.jpgCombative English: lesson one.

 

Sachiko must be considered “different” here in Japan. She works in the male-dominated research and development section of a major automobile company. Her interests include English, Hollywood movies, and fast cars. She wears dark, thick-framed glasses that cover most of her round, childlike face. She could easily pass as an elementary school student, but was taking an adult, basic-level English class I was teaching.

One day, she stayed behind to ask me a question. She could hardly put two words together. But no matter. After my having taught English for more than 10 years in Japan, my teacher instincts fill in those pesky prepositions or pronouns that often make even the more advanced students cringe with fear. It’s amazing how ideas can be conveyed without these trimmings. Such bare, stripped-down sentences deliver more impact to what the speaker wants to say.

“Very sorry. I have question. What do you say, ‘don’t touch me’ in English?” she asked, in broken, uncertain English.

I asked what she meant. And she began to tell me a story in a pidgin mix of English and Japanese about what had happened to her.

It was at an art museum, she said. While she was examining a print, a man came up to her and began stroking her on the buttocks. She pleaded with him in Japanese to stop, but he continued to harass her, and then began touching her breasts with impunity.

I asked why she didn’t scream out for help or run away, but she only said she didn’t want to make trouble, and therefore endured the harassment. Then she told me it was not the first time. Her pleas in Japanese were always ignored.

If her pleas were in English, she said, everything would change. She’s seen the movies — the Western women on celluloid who take no shit from anyone. Even if the guys who touched her didn’t understand a word, it wouldn’t matter. The English would be enough to send them scurrying away.

The language has the potency of a karate chop to the head. The economic and military superpowers of the English-speaking world were to thank for that. And an appreciative nod goes to Hollywood as well for making English the world language. Thank God Johnny Depp was endowed with a native English tongue.

The dialog in our classroom’s English textbook always seemed dead to me: a utopia on paper where everyone wants to be your friend, where a “Hi, how are you?” will make you the instant life of the party.

Finally, here arose a lesson that was practical, one a student could finally use and benefit from, as opposed to the American middle-class values instilled by those textbooks.

After some hesitation, I finally wrote “Get the fuck off me!” on the blackboard, and began teaching her the unsubtle nuances of the word “fuck.”

She read the words slowly, deliberately, and in monotone: “Get … the … fuck … off … me.”

The softness in Sachiko’s voice sounded as if she were reciting “Mother Goose” to a group of children. “Fuck” never sounded so sweet.

English, especially “combative English” (for lack of a better term), was all about stress, I emphasized while pointing at the word “fuck” on the blackboard. This, I said — tapping at the word — is where the stress should lie.

Even if the intended listener didn’t understand, it wouldn’t matter. The strong vocalization of the one word alone would do the job. Even the formation of the sound of the letter “f” looks intimidating. The raised upper lip reveals the front teeth while the lower lip is tucked underneath. Any such articulation that bares a set of teeth brings us closer to our primal instincts of survival. If that isn’t enough to scare off a predator, the hard, menacing sound of the “k” could be the coup de grâce.

Sachiko repeated the phrase on the blackboard with more emphasis, more confident about what she had to do. While most of her classmates talk about learning English to learn about other cultures, to have an advantage in the workplace, and to meet Westerners, Sachiko won’t be making new friends with this newly acquired phrase. She said it to herself a few times, and even began to sound a little menacing.

For her, it’s just a sound, a magic word. She knows it’s swearing, but she’s unaware of the hatred, anger, and confrontation that its English speakers intend to express when using the word. You could say baka yaro until your face turns blue, but more likely than not, you wouldn’t get that same tingling in your stomach as you would from saying “Fucking idiot.”

English sells. Or rather, the likeness of English sells. In Japan, the language is hip, even if you don’t understand what is being said.

Sachiko thanked me and practiced the phrase over and over again under her breath as she walked out the door. She’s finally mastered it. She’s armed — with a phrase that will embolden her.

 

Married in Iowa — almost

“Application pending.”

For about 24 hours in Polk County, Iowa, same-sex couples were allowed to apply for marriage licenses. Below is a letter sent by Pam Lee and Beth Beglin of Coralville to their friends and loved ones.

August 31, 2007

Dear Friends, Family, and Co-Workers,

Pam and I wanted to share our accounting of a very unique day in our life, most notable for the support of some very special individuals and the wild swings of emotions we experienced. We chose this co-authored story as the easiest way for us to share this event, despite the fact that you may not know any of the individuals involved (other than us). We also thought it would help us keep faith that at some point in the future, we will actually celebrate our legally valid marriage with you.

We were surprised, admittedly stunned, after yesterday’s ruling by Polk County Judge Robert Hanson striking down Iowa’s marriage laws limiting marriage to a “man and a woman,” thus paving the way for same-sex marriages in the Hawkeye State. The decision was sweeping in its breath, invalidating the law on both a due process and equal protection basis, and at every level of judicial review, from strict scrutiny to rational basis. We just didn’t think it would happen here, in the heart of the Heartland, in Iowa, at least not yet. Coming home from an evening fundraiser for Community Mental Health, Pam and I re-read the decision, and then I proposed. Admittedly it wasn’t even close to romantic, but I have to say I really didn’t expect a “Maybe.” After almost twenty years of sharing our lives, I thought we were past the “tryout stage.” We went to bed thinking, “Did this really happen?”

Those of you who know me well know that I am not an early morning person. It’s all I can do to make our 9:30 am start for our Sunday morning coffee klatch. But this morning was different. Wide awake at first light, Pam and I reached a mutual decision, “We should do this.” Knowing a judicial stay was only a matter of time, we sprang out of bed, grabbed the computer, researched Iowa’s marriage requirements, and printed an application, which we began to immediately complete before coming to our first dilemma. Who wanted to be the “Groom” and who wanted to be the “Bride,” as those were the designated categorical descriptions contained in the application? Frankly, we had never considered it before. Could we cross out “groom” and both be brides? Would this invalidate the form? Are we really having a discussion about this? Would the sanctity of marriage be ruined with gender-neutral language?? Okay, flip a coin. Beth is the groom, Pam is the bride.

First bridge crossed, we worked our way through the rest of the form. Who requires a form to be completed only in upper and lower case printing? Who asks for State, County, City, Address, and Zip Code, in that particular order, on any required form? Three shredded copies later, and an early morning phone call to confirm the spelling of Pam’s mother’s middle name, Francis with an “i” or Frances with an “e” (it’s “e”), and we were ready to go. Now we only needed a witness! That decision was easy, as there was no other person we would have wanted to ask but Sally Cline, our long time friend and neighbor, and someone who has shared many late night bottles of wine with me discussing marriage and gay rights. Our 7:00 am phone call elicited a momentary pause, especially when I asked Sally what her plans were for the morning. “Well, I had eventually planned on getting into work at some point, why?” “Well, Pam and I wanted to know if you would be our witness for our marriage application as we can’t think of anyone else that we would rather have.” Dead silence. “Hello? Hello?” Only when I heard Sally’s emotionally choked reply, “I would be honored” did my own eyes begin to well as I realized our marriage was an actual possibility. “We’ll meet you at the Johnson County Recorder’s office at 8:00 am,” I softly choked back, hoping that we would be able to process our application without the necessity of a trip to Des Moines.

“I’m sorry, but the Judge’s ruling is valid only in Polk County. You will have to go to Des Moines to apply for a marriage license,” explained Johnson County Recorder Kim Painter. Pam and I exchanged glances, and said, “Let’s go.” First stop was the Johnson County Courthouse, where Sally validated our marriage application by affixing her signature as a “disinterested” witness, confirming our identities in front of Teresa, our office notary and legal assistant, and quite a few of my fellow co-workers.

We were not quite sure who was more excited at this sudden course of events, all of my coworkers, or Pam and I. Just as Sally was about to sign our application, Iris stopped the proceedings, said no marriage could take place without flowers, and proceeded to Meredith’s office, where she grabbed Meredith’s “Welcome back from your maternity leave” bouquet, divided it in half, wrapped and taped the stems in damp towels, and handed us our floral arrangements for the signing ceremony. Meanwhile, Janet was closing file cabinets and doors so we would have a better photo backdrop. Co-workers snapped pictures for us as Pam and I traded signs of “Bride” and “Groom” while flashbulbs popped. We later did tell Iris that this Irish-Catholic/Buddhist Unitarian couple would gladly hire her, the Jewish American Princess wedding planner, for our actual ceremony. Andy gave us newly printed MapQuest directions to the Polk County Administration Building, we hopped in the Miata, and bolted.

Flying past golden cornfields, Pam and I talked and planned the entire ride to Des Moines. We made our invitation list, discussed possible dates for a reception, began picking music, and even went so far as to consider the actual details of the ceremony we would hold for friends and family after our courthouse marriage. We became so excited about a possibility that had been long been closed to us. Imagine having the same legal protections as every other citizen in a committed relationship! We couldn’t fathom it.

Arriving at the Polk County Administration Building, we walked inside towards the Recorder’s Office, traversing a long hallway occupied by several TV crews and cameras. As soon as we approached, they said “Lesbians!” grabbed their cameras, and quickly began filming. Okay, they really didn’t say “Lesbians,” but all the rest is true. Pam and I felt like we had “GAY MARRIAGE” stamped on our foreheads. Guess it’s a good thing we are “out.” We had our application signed and notarized, and headed to the Polk County Courthouse with an application to waive the three-day waiting period, which required a judge’s signature. Our plan was to get the waiver signed, file it, receive our marriage license, and head back to Iowa City to be married that afternoon. We requested to see Judge Rosenberg as he had signed waivers for other applicants, and we were seated in his courtroom, just outside of his open office door. We vaguely heard the judge on the telephone, and after hanging up, he invited us into his office. Pam and I introduced ourselves, explained our request, and heard the judge say:

I apologize for having to give you bad news, but I just spoke with Judge Hanson, who authored yesterday’s decision. He just informed me he has issued an immediate stay of his ruling, pending appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court. I am so sorry.

Before we left Iowa City this morning, we knew this was the possible, even likely, outcome of our marriage attempt. We knew we had limited time, and that an appeal and stay could occur at any minute. We honestly thought we had steeled ourselves against such a disappointment. Yet, when it came, it hurt, more than we could ever have imagined, and more than we can ever express in words. Deflated, we thanked Judge Rosenberg, and walked silently back to the Administration Building, handed back our notarized application“ with the required fee, and now have a file stamped “marriage application pending”, awaiting a decision by the Iowa Supreme Court. When that will come is anyone’s guess, as is the eventual outcome of the ruling. In the meantime, 21 Iowa same-sex couples were issued marriage licenses that will not be accepted, and a male couple comprised of two Iowa State students became the first and only legally recognized gay marriage in Iowa.

It’s funny but when something isn’t legally permissible for a class of individuals to which you belong, you can fool yourself into believing it doesn’t matter all that much. However, when something so fundamental as being treated equally in the eyes of the law as every other citizen moves into the realm of being a real possibility, it is incredibly difficult to return to one’s previous state of denial when that possibility is quashed. Marriage, and its attendant rights and responsibilities, matters, at least to us. For almost 20 years, we have gladly shared in its responsibilities. Today, we were hoping beyond hope to finally avail ourselves of its accordant rights.

Pam and I left the Polk County Administration Building, driving to the Cheesecake Factory for lunch. Ironically, it is the same restaurant we dined at two-and-a-half years ago after I was deemed morally fit enough to be admitted to the Iowa Bar, and sworn in by one of the same justices who will now decide whether I should have the same rights as every other Iowa citizen for whom I can legally advocate. As we unsuccessfully attempted to blink back our tears, we tried to focus on what we will always remember from today, the love, support and excitement of our friends, family, and co-workers. Thank you, from the very bottom of our broken hearts.

Beth and Pam

 

 

Change me

200709_changeme.jpgHigh school Spanish and Michael Moore play a part in complicated financial dealings on the streets of Seville.

 

The city was lovely in December. Most of the narrow streets in the town center were draped in lighting, and I’m not talking schmaltzy, blinking, trailer-trash numbers either. These were uniformly white strands, their elegance adding to the city’s already over-the-top beauty. And the streets were simply packed in the evenings — everyone just finishing up work, kids running around, street musicians competing for the attention of passersby. The stores were packed with holiday shoppers, but the wares they had for sale were nothing like what the street vendors were peddling.

The street vendor’s routine was similar to that of most illegal street sellers: Spread a huge blanket on the sidewalk, and arrange the goodies over it in a way that facilitates a hasty, gather-it-up getaway should the police come around. Most of the vendors, who often displayed their goods in packs of six or seven, had things like rainbow-colored knitted caps and scarves, leather belts and bags — things I wasn’t interested in. But one fellow had an absolute gem of a thing: a foot-high stuffed cow standing upright on a fairly stable set of hind legs. When turned on, its upper body simply thrashed in every direction. The action of the upper portion led the legs to waddle here and there, and the effect of 20 of these cows doing this in concert just captivated me.

As I stood at a distance watching, I pictured the toy as a gift for my three-year-old nephew, Zdenek — how much he would enjoy it! The vendor, a short fellow who looked to be about 30, had a shock of straight, combed-over black hair. He wore a lined flannel shirt over jeans, and running shoes. He had a pleasant-looking face, but his eyes were nervous and constantly scanning the crowds. I must have looked suspicious to him standing across the pedestrian way, because his eyes kept returning to mine. Eventually (more to stop him from eyeing me than from a real desire to buy), I went over and asked him how much one of the thrashing cows cost.

“Ten euros,” he said. I had thought double that, and right then I decided to buy two.

“Ok,” I said, “I’ll take two.” The guy gave me a big smile and took two of the stationary, plastic-bagged cows from the back row and handed them to me.

“Batteries included,” he said.

“What service,” I responded, and smiled. I took the 50 euros from my pocket and handed it over. His face sort of changed as I held out the money, and he fished around in his pockets before asking if I had something smaller. I didn’t. He looked around for a second and then suggested that I go into a bar — he pointed at one behind me — and ask for change. I turned around and looked. There was a side street that led off of the main shopping avenue, and maybe 50 feet down was a busy pub. The plastic garden furniture placed out in front was completely occupied and surrounded by napkins and other trash lying on the ground. I nodded and told him I’d be right back.

As I walked, I felt the weight of apprehension settle upon me — I wasn’t sure how to ask for change. I racked my brain for the phrase and found an approximation before walking into the bar. Everyone noticed me coming in. The whole pub quieted down to check out the stranger. At least 30 sets of eyes rested on me. But the most important set — the barman’s — came nowhere close to mine. He studiously avoided eye contact for a full minute before I spoke up, asking him in Spanish to change me. “Puede cambiar me?

He didn’t lift his head from his task, but responded, “Into what?” The people around me laughed, but I didn’t understand the joke.

“Two 20s and a 10,” I said. He again said something I didn’t catch — more laughter. “I’m sorry,” I responded. “I don’t understand.”

“I don’t give change,” he said. “What?” I said. “I don’t give change.” “Oh. Well, thanks,” I said, “That’s very kind.” I tried to say it ironically, but in a foreign language, one can never tell.

“Nothing to thank,” he responded.

I weaved my way through the crowd and back to the vendor. As he saw me coming, he picked up the two cows he had chosen for me and said, “Okay?” I shook my head and showed him the 50 again. He looked at me and said something I didn’t understand, and as people tend to do when they don’t understand, I nodded my head and agreed with him. He smiled then and placed the cows among the other cows, then reached out for the 50. I blinked in confusion as he did this, and he said, very slowly, that he was going to try to get change and that he would be right back. I said okay, and he smiled and took the money, then weaved through the pedestrians and into the bar.

As I stood there in front of the thrashing cows, distracted by their non-stop action, I wondered that the man would leave his wares just lying there — someone might steal one and run away while he was gone. But then I realized I probably wouldn’t let anyone do that. They had somehow become my temporary responsibility. I even moved behind them to let the pedestrians have a better view, and this seemed to be the right move, because just a moment later, two children, probably brother and sister, ran over and stood in front of the cows. They were really beautiful kids, dressed in formal winter wear. The girl was in a tan, knee-high wool jacket and thick stockings. Her ensemble was topped off by a matching ribbon in her hair. The boy was wearing the same jacket and brown slacks, and I couldn’t help but smile at them as they jabbered away, pointing and giggling at the raucous cows.

Still smiling, I looked up at the parents, who looked like they might buy. They edged closer and asked me how much the cows were, and I told them 10 euros each. They smiled at each other and nodded, then tried to pull their kids away. There were protests, but the parents placated them, and the man winked at me as they walked away to the right — I took his signal to mean that he would return to buy. Buoyed by the kids and thinking of how I could tell the vendor he had a customer, I was smiling and on the verge of a chuckle when I turned my head to the left and saw two policemen coming toward me. They did not look nearly as fun-loving as the children had. My smile fled as they came up to me.

The big one looked me up and down and demanded something of me. I told him I didn’t understand and he took a step toward me, as if making to grab me. The second one said, in English, “Speak English?”

“Yes.”

“Are these yours?”

“No!”

“Why are you standing over them?”

“I was just … just looking,” I stammered. “Whose are they?” I shrugged, looking at the English speaker. Just then, over their shoulders, I saw the vendor emerge from the bar. He stopped short when he saw the police standing in front of me.

I told the policeman I didn’t know whose they were. This brought out a grunt and they commenced to speak between themselves. As they did this, I looked back to the vendor and saw him hold up the money, crumble it, and throw it to the ground. Then he shrugged and ran like hell. The Spanish-speaking policeman must have seen my attention shift over their shoulders, because a moment later, he yelled to his partner and pointed at the fleeing vendor. They both looked at me and yelled. I didn’t understand the Spanish speaker, but the English speaker said, “Is that the owner?”

“I … I don’t know.” The bigger one started running through the gathering crowd, but it was hard for him to get through. The English speaker moved closer to me. “I want your identification.”

“I don’t have any. It’s … in my hotel.” “Then tell me your name and your hotel name.” No idea where this came from, but out it popped:

“My name is Michael Moore. I’m staying at the Holiday Inn.”

The policeman wrote my “name” down and told me to go back to my hotel — they would come visit me shortly.

“Yes sir.” Glaring at me meaningfully, he tucked his notepad into his jacket and then gathered up the cows with the sheet. He bound the resulting sack, which was thrashing everywhere with the cows inside, with a pipe tie that he fished out of his pocket, then fought his way through the crowd in the direction his partner had gone.

As I faced the inquisitive crowd that had gathered, I suddenly felt sick to my stomach from the stress. It isn’t often that one gets to experience another man’s lot so completely. I puffed out my cheeks and made my way through the people and over to where the vendor had thrown the money. I had to search for awhile, but eventually I found a wadded-up bill and unfolded it. It was the 50. The bastard wouldn’t change him, either.

 

Words on Operation Iraqi Freedom

200709_wardance.jpg

Living in the confines of liberation.

 

 

A bluebird slips between electric wires
as we wake to radio static and the President
who says there was no choice but war
but there were no plans for war, a confabulation
confusing as the tongue of a captive raven, split
so he’ll talk to amuse the neighbor
who nursed the raven back to health
after it was hit by a car in the street
and now keeps it caged in a backyard
where it has learned the price of being saved.

 

personal stories. global issues.