Blog

 

Inconvenient truths and irrevocable consequences

The other day I saw the Al Gore movie An Inconvenient Truth. Let’s get beyond, for a moment, the issue of how likeable Gore is (certai…

The other day I saw the Al Gore movie An Inconvenient Truth. Let’s get beyond, for a moment, the issue of how likeable Gore is (certainly more animated and witty now that his campaign handlers are gone) or what his chances are as a presidential draftee for 2008 (denies any thirst for a rematch, but then again, so did Nixon). The film is worth seeing on its own merits. It’s the clearest presentation I’ve ever seen of the science of global warming, and the most convincing analysis I’ve heard of what the future likely holds if we fail to act soon. Forget duct tape. Maybe we should be more worried about the sea level rising up to engulf Lower Manhattan and the panhandle of Florida, not to mention large swaths of vulnerable coastland around the world. That’s just one of the disturbing scenarios that the film contemplates.

It’s remarkable that some of the important developments on the environmental front are completely lost on many Americans. I consider myself fairly informed (some readers of this blog may disagree), and yet I had no idea about the progress that has already been made in fighting ozone depletion. Remember the holes in the ozone layer that so alarmed everyone about a decade or so ago? Thanks to global cooperation in enforcing bans on chlorofluorocarbons, there is evidence that the depletion rate is finally slowing. On the flip side, I also had little understanding of just how much the planet’s temperature has been rising in recent years, relative to normal fluctuations, and what the consequences of this unprecedented climate shift are. We watch the TV meteorologists talk every day about record temperatures and record numbers of hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods, but no one talks about the connection between the two. We read news articles that present the White House talking points (provided courtesy of the energy lobby) that global warming is not manmade, but merely a naturally occurring up-tick in the planet’s thermostat — as if this were a legitimate scientific position.

As the film makes clear, the international scientific community believes, with certainty and unanimity, that human beings are responsible for the vast majority of global warming. And the danger of this trend could not be more obvious. It is already a reality for those people who live in the path of rising water levels, strengthened hurricanes and tornadoes, and disease-carrying insects that thrive in heat. Yet few politicians talk about doing anything substantive to address the problem. When we start redrawing our maps to take into account the world’s shrinking land mass, it will probably too late then to do much about it.

It’s a climate shift that may be compared to a seismic shift in the way it will — sooner or later, but probably sooner than we realize — transform the optimism we hold about the future and the appreciation we have for our ultra-convenient modern lives. If we’re smart, it may also influence the politics we support and the lifestyles we lead. If not, the Earth may have other corrective measures planned. Like tectonic plates slowly moving underground, the change may seem imperceptible — a degree or two here, a few more there — until a tipping point is reached. And when the reckoning comes, we may open our eyes too late to see a landscape irrevocably changed, and irreparably disfigured.

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

NBC is looking for Talent and Treasure this summer

If, after a fun day at the beach or pool, you just don’t feel like relaxing on the veranda and sipping a piña colada, there are some new major network shows peppered amongst all the reruns — but your time may be better spent among the fireflies and mosquitoes.  

Struggling at the bottom of the broadcast network ratings game, NBC has decided that originality isn’t a solution to building an audience — but ripping off successful concepts from other networks is an easier way to spin Nielsen gold this summer.  They must have thrown a lot of money at American Idol’s Simon Cowell in order to get him to produce the Idol-like America’s Got Talent, hosted by the legendary Regis Philbin, who himself was involved with a summer blockbuster many years ago called Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?.  In this latest incarnation of the variety talent show that began back on radio, called The Original Amateur Hour, producers scoured the nation for talent, but being that they were more interested in the kind that frequented the 1970’s syndicated The Gong Show than real, honest-to-good entertainers, you’re really witnessing more of a show that should be called America’s Got Issues.  Where American Idol and The Amateur Hour are and were serious ventures where winners actually do become recording stars (Frank Sinatra, Pat Boone, Kelly Clarkson, Clay Aiken), America’s Got Talent seems to be Simon Cowell trying to exploit his power and influence and adding one more reality show that we really don’t need.  

Like with Cowell’s American Inventor series on ABC, which was a terrific turn on the concept and was quite entertaining and moving — though ratings-challenged — Cowell wisely stays away from the judging bench (probably only because of a contractual limitation with Fox) but decides to bring in the B team to take his place and that of his Idol cohorts.  Playing judge on America’s Got Talent is TV and European recording star David Hasselhoff, who, I’m guessing being a producer himself, has the cred to judge others’ talent, though if you’ve ever watched an episode of Baywatch, you may wonder about that.  Sitting next to Hasselhoff is the now-grown-up teen singing sensation and TV’s Moesha, Brandy Norwood, who is a poor man’s Paula Abdul, and that’s saying a lot, considering Abdul’s place in the grand hall of entertainment is somewhere on the first few floors.  Simon’s alter ego in the designated British-only chair is another infamous acerbic Englishman, Piers Morgan, a former editor at the London Daily Mirror and, I’m guessing, an authority on American entertainment.  In this incarnation, the judges collectively can stop a performance when all three hit their buzzers, a la The Gong Show.  I’m guessing that the producers believe that American audiences won’t sit through a show unless there’s tension between judges and odd, talentless, bizarre individuals making fools of themselves on national television.  Perhaps they’re right, but I have more faith in the general public.  Regis is underutilized here and the judges overused.  I believe that America has oodles of talent, but only a sliver is presented on this show — purposely.  If you’re in need of some talent-oriented TV this summer, stick with the other Freemantle show on Fox, So You Think You Can Dance?, which sticks to Idol’s serious tone and shows very talented young dancers in a straight but entertaining competition.

With Treasure Hunters, NBC looked at CBS’s successful The Amazing Race and thought they needed their own travel log competition series, so they went to Brian Grazer and Ron Howard’s company, Imagine Television (Arrested Development), for assistance.  The beauty of The Amazing Race is its simplicity and its focus on spotlighting countries around the world.  Treasure Hunters expands on the challenges that Amazing Race uses to help even the competition by making the hunt for treasure the focus of the show — teams of three, who also have a previous relationship, must figure out clues and solve puzzles which will ultimately lead to a key that will open a million-dollar treasure chest somewhere hidden in the world.  Like Amazing Race, they must travel from one location to another and go through both physical and mental challenges.  So far they’ve stayed within U.S. borders and, unless they venture to exotic spots in the world, Treasure Hunters may lose audience attention, which Amazing Race discovered when they tried a family edition that, for the most part, kept teams U.S.-bound.

Being an Amazing Race fan, I was not expecting much from Treasure Hunters, but after watching the first few episodes, it has grown on me and I’m beginning to root for certain teams — a key to the success of these types of shows.  The producers have rightly decided not to linger too much on the clues, but what they do show of the teams working together to figure them out is just enough to be interesting without being tedious.  If the show travels around the globe and the hunt remains slightly interactive — allowing the audience a chance to figure out the clues themselves — then I think Treasure Hunters may become appointment television.  My only big negative comment is with the host, Laird Macintosh, a bland, soap opera-type who just doesn’t add anything to the table. Here, the host appears on cell phones to relay information, but without the interaction that Amazing Race’s Phil Keoghan or Survivor’s Jeff Probst have with competitors, Macintosh comes across as some digitized, computer-generated “hostitron.” If he didn’t appear with the contestants at least during some portions, he might as well have been a pixel-only host.  I say put the axe to America’s Got Talent, and give Regis a visa to go Treasure Hunting around the globe.  Better yet, why doesn’t NBC just give us viewers the money spent on these shows and let us go travel around the world ourselves?  It would be a whole lot more fun.

For your summer dose of reality television, I say check out Treasure Hunters and So You Think You Can Dance?, but skip America’s Got Talent.  See local listings for times and channels.

Rich Burlingham

 

Silencing the opposition

This is a severe slap in the face to all those who advocate democracy and freedom of expression in Egypt.

Ibrahim Issa, Egyptian journalist and chief editor of Al-Dustour, an independent weekly newspaper, speaking about his one-year prison term for defaming Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.  Issa’s publication, Al-Dustuor, reported the case of Said Abdullah, who filed a lawsuit against President Mubarak for effectively pilfering and squandering public funds when state-owned enterprises were privatized. Sahar Zaki, the reporter, and Said Abdullah, the plaintiff, were also handed one-year prison sentences and crippling fines of $1,743 in a country where gross national income per capita is $1,250. Bravo, Hosni.  

Mimi Hanaoka

 

The Bush executive: more equal than others

Reading the U.S. Constitution, one might think that the legislative, executive, and judicial branches have equal power. But, judging by its …

Reading the U.S. Constitution, one might think that the legislative, executive, and judicial branches have equal power. But, judging by its contempt for Congress’ lawmaking powers, the Bush administration believes that some branches are more equal than others. For instance, George Bush has decided to impose his own exceptions upon Congress’ ban on torture, which passed the Senate by a wide margin. The reason? The Constitution told him to do it. “If the Constitution and the law conflict, the president must choose,” an administration spokesperson said. Never mind that the Constitution has something explicit to say about torture, too.

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

Why do they hate us?

One thing to remember about the arrest of seven Miami men involved with the alleged plot to attack the Sears Tower is that they come from one…

One thing to remember about the arrest of seven Miami men involved with the alleged plot to attack the Sears Tower is that they come from one of the most impoverished cities in America. A world away from affluent South Beach and its silky white beaches, the city of Miami has the third-highest poverty rate in the nation, with 28 percent of its population and 41 percent of its children living in poverty, according to 2004 census estimates. (Remember that the official threshold for poverty in this country is quite low: A family of four with a combined income under $18,850 was considered poor in 2004.)

The suspects also come from one of the poorest neighborhoods within Miami, Liberty City, an African American urban island shaped by decades of segregation. Liberty City was the scene of bloody riots in 1980 after an all-white jury acquitted five white police officers for the killing of a black motorist — in spite of an incriminating coroner’s report and testimony by one of the officers. Eighteen people died in the ensuing violence.

All seven of the terrorism suspects are black. Two are from Haiti, the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.

The connection between terrorism and poverty is controversial. Poor, unequal, and unstable countries like Afghanistan and Somalia have become havens for terrorism, and yet many terrorists striking across borders — such as the September 11 hijackers — came from privileged backgrounds. This noteworthy Harvard study dismisses any connection and instead points to the degree of political freedom as a crucial factor.

Yet in the Miami case, five of the suspects are American citizens. The threat, if true, was mostly homegrown — grown in a country that has been (well, at least until recently) admired around the world for its devotion to liberty and democracy. Why, then, would Americans commit violence against their own country? Why would they hate us?

The fact that these men hail from one of the most impoverished and segregated neighborhoods in America makes me wonder if poverty and race had anything to do with their alleged embrace of terrorism. Violence against a repressive, authoritarian regime or an invading power may come from all quarters of society, but violence against an open, established democracy seems to have a particular attraction among the most marginalized and alienated discontents — those who, thanks to the perpetual indignities of poverty and racism, have come to see their own nation as the enemy.

This is all the more reason for us to confront the reality of Two Americas: one full of wealth and hope, the other struggling to survive. Some may complain about raising the specter of “class warfare,” but the price of neglecting inequality may be class warfare of a much more brutal kind.

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen

 

Out with the old

Most memories of my childhood home revolve around simple pleasures like baseball games at sunset or the smell of hamburgers during family barbeques.  As a kid, I never thought much about the fact that the neighborhood would one day change, but as I’ve grown older I’ve started to see the effects of the years’ gradual modifications.  

It was inevitable, of course, because of the evolving nature of technology and the fact that families change over time.  The tight-knit community I once knew is transforming as children grow up, families move, and the cycle starts for another generation.   This is actually not even the first time in recent years this plot of land has undergone a complete revamping.  The block used to be a farm until land developers spotted suburban gold and turned it into what my neighbors and I would come to know as home.  Some people might view this as progress while others see destruction; I’m sure the farmers and homeowners don’t see eye to eye.

For years, I’ve been hearing similar stories about the neighborhoods my parents were raised in.  Being born closer to the time of their families’ moves to the U.S., they grew up in a community that banded together, sharing in the experience of being in a new land while possessing a common link in the same parent country.  As assimilation occurred, the bond started to disintegrate and families moved out while a new congregation took root.  What were once fiercely ethnic, familial communities have given way to poverty- and crime-ridden areas, much to the disappointment of my relatives, who talk about the old neighborhoods with the same reverence the French royalty must have spoken of Versailles.  

This discussion hit home recently as I live in Manhattan and have become acquainted with the neighborhood around West 70th St. and Broadway, an area perfectly situated with the allure of beautiful city architecture.  Back in 1971, a movie based on the northern end of this very block was released, titled A Panic in Needle Park.  The neighborhood, it turns out, used to be called Needle Park, and not because of its availability of sewing conventions.  

This street corner, which today has turned into one of the more established neighborhoods in Manhattan, was once so full of derelicts, it warranted a movie based around its drug culture.  The fact that one city block could change so much in just 35 years is remarkable on its own; it is also a remarkable example of the changing face of America.  

When Supreme Court Justice Scalia joked, “As you know, all change is presumptively wrong,” he hit upon a deeper concept: everything will change, sometimes for better, sometimes for worse.  Either way, the consequences must be examined. Every time a neighborhood is demolished or its makeup is changed, a bit of history is buried.  

For the sake of growth, we must always remember that change is not necessarily an evil; for the sake of preservation, we must remember to keep our pasts alive.

Mike Robustelli

 

95-93

95-93: The bishops’ vote that narrowly elected Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, of Nevada, on Sunday as the first female head of an Anglican Church.  She will be installed as presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church.

7: Total number of candidates who were in the running for the position.

9: The number of years Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori will serve as presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church.

2003: The year the Episcopal Church in America elected the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.

2.3 million: Members the Episcopal Church.

1/4: The fraction of those members who are 65 years old or older.  

Mimi Hanaoka

  

 

No more American dreaming?

Here’s an interesting piece in the International Herald Tribune about the “fast-fading luster of the American story” — that i…

Here’s an interesting piece in the International Herald Tribune about the “fast-fading luster of the American story” — that is, the weakening power of American ideals and culture abroad thanks to globalization and the recent, divisive projection of American military power overseas.

I think the idea that Hollywood is losing sway over audiences abroad is somewhat overstated. This recent article in The Washington Post, for instance, suggests that the popularity of American movies is growing overseas, along with so-called “local product,” or domestically produced films. (Pop culture remains one of America’s top exports.) Even in France, a country with a storied history of filmmaking as well as state protection of its film industry, the American media juggernaut is all but unstoppable at the box office.

That said, America’s image abroad has clearly deteriorated in many countries in the past six years, as this recent Pew Research Center report makes obvious. This distaste for American foreign policy appears to live comfortably alongside a fascination with American pop culture.

A less parochial and more culturally sensitive Hollywood can play a role in improving America’s relations with the rest of the world, as the IHT op-ed points out. But what is more important is the actual policy of the U.S. government. “To recapture its winning story in this new global politics of culture, to recover its waning soft power,” the op-ed’s authors argue, “America has to once again close the gap between its ideals and their practical realization at home and abroad, starting with changing our policies and getting out of Iraq.”

Victor Tan Chen

Victor Tan Chen is In The Fray's editor in chief and the author of Cut Loose: Jobless and Hopeless in an Unfair Economy. Site: victortanchen.com | Facebook | Twitter: @victortanchen