Blog

 

Environmental detriment of bottled drinks?

The detriment of the unenvironmentalness of bottled water have recently been the cause celebre in the media. There were lots of similar reports about the plastic waste that bottles have made and how bottled water doesn’t necessarily taste any better or have less bacteria than tap water. It was even reported that cities and towns’ local governments have been trying to tout the natural deliciousness of tap water to stem the plastic waste created from the bottled variety. Studies and statistics were cited on how many hundreds of thousands of plastic bottles end up on the planet just from bottled water alone. But these so-called media giants who jump onto any sort of trendy — ahem — "news item" only skimmed the surface of this subject.

History of bottled drinks encased in plastic
Beverages including soda and water began to be bottled in plastic in 1970 and 1968 respectively. Starting in the 1980s, the plastic used for bottling was of the PET (polyethylene terephtalate) type, which is recyclable. This type of plastic became the plastic bottling standard.

Number of bottles from water or other drinks
Nowhere in any of the media "reports" on the bad-for-the-environment-plastic-bottles-from-bottled-water stories were there any statistics about any of the other beverages in plastic bottles. What about the annual numbers of plastic soda bottles produced vs. bottled water? If some of the people who drink bottled water now are ones who used to drink soda, the number of bottles strewn about the Earth could possibly be the same.

International Bottled Water Association President Joseph Doss told the Agence France-Presse that their industry alone should not bear the brunt of the criticism: "If the debate is about the impact of plastic packaging on the environment, a narrow focus on bottled water spotlights only a small portion of the packaged beverage category and an even smaller sliver of the universe of packaged products. Any efforts to reduce the resources necessary to produce and distribute packaged goods — and increase recycling rates — must focus on all packaging."

Health benefits from drinking water vs. soda
No matter where the water comes from, bottled or from the tap, it is much more healthful than chemical-laden soda pop. If there are these negative reports about how bottled water is bad for the environment, people might instead pick up some soda, thinking that there are no bad reports about that.

Plastic bottles can be recycled
Like stated previously, all plastic bottled drinks use the standard PET plastic, which is recyclable. Even if the bottles are thrown into the trash, most likely in large urban areas, someone will pick through the garbage specifically looking for plastic bottles so they can cash in the deposit.

 

The best thing for the environment is definitely not buying plastic bottled drinks. But, if the bottle is the only thing a drink can be purchased in, it’s good to know that at least the bottles can be recycled — and drinking water is definitely much better for one’s health than soda.

keeping the earth ever green

 

The battle between young and old

The first time I heard John Mayer’s song, "Waiting on the World to Change," I was ecstatic. I had a vision of joining together with an intoxicating fervor. Finally, this is the social commentary that would be the spark igniting my peers into action. Instead of waiting for the baby boomers to roll over and relinquish control, we’d rise up and take it!

Well, I couldn’t have been more wrong. Apparently my generation is perfectly content to continue waiting. In fact, I don’t believe many of my peers are even standing in line. I’m pretty sure they’re all out back hiding behind some trees trying to avoid the shift in power all together.

I can’t blame my generation’s shared apathy to the impending inheritance of the world, especially in its current state. Every minute of every waking hour, the media is saturated with images and sounds illustrating death, doom, and destruction occurring on the planet. And as we look around, we can’t help but hold our parents partly accountable for the condition of the world.  

But it’s not entirely the boomers’ fault. They were completely unprepared to handle the globalization that bloomed under their feet. Unfortunately, love isn’t a redeemable currency. So they made choices based on what they believed to be right at that time, and with little regard for the future. Now, they’re slowly coming to terms with those choices.

And it’s not that the boomers don’t want to fix some of the disastrous outcomes of the decisions they made. But, they’re old. And they’re tired. And they’re much more concerned with recapturing the 40-plus years they’ve wasted away at an unfulfilling job. Just as I can’t blame my generation for not wanting to take responsibility for the crumbling world, I can’t blame my parents’ generation for their inability to fix it.

As more and more boomers turn the corner onto the path toward retirement, they are experiencing a second coming of age. New retirees are becoming introspective as they are afforded more time for leisure and relaxation. Seeing the mountains of material things amassed over the years in search of happiness, the boomers are now finding solace in using the fruits of their labor to experience and to explore. And this realization is slowly starting to seep into the psyche of my generation.

As the boomers are running to the finish, my generation is floundering in its first steps. We’ve enjoyed a cushy life free of difficult decisions and burgeoning responsibility. College isn’t the liberating, mind-expanding rebellion our parents experienced. Technology has made it easy to continue living under a shroud of parental influence. And while we hear our parents when they tell us to get a job to make lots of money, we can’t help but squirm a little.

Whereas the boomers experienced a temporary freedom from parental control, we haven’t had the chance to escape. Although I dream for my generation to collectively rise up and demand control, everyone is still trying to figure it out. Defiance will come upon the realization that we are capable of making it on our own without the help of our parents. But until then, I’ll just continue to wait.

 

Child healthcare, eavesdropping, and protecting journalists

"President Bush vowed Wednesday to veto bipartisan legislation that would sharply increase funding for a popular health insurance program for poor children."

Well, isn’t that sweet?

The reason: "S-Chip covers children whose families earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to pay for private insurance. The bills would make an estimated 3.2 million additional children eligible for S-Chip. Bush says this expansion is a first step toward government-funded universal health coverage."

Well, we certainly don’t want that, now do we? We certainly don’t want America to have a better health care system than Peru? We don’t want to save lives and improve the health of our citizens like every other modern nation on Earth does. The health of children  pfft, who cares? Once it’s out of the womb (when we dote on it and talk about the culture of life, when we vow to do anything to protect it), it’s on its own.

I know it’s only by a single seat, but the Democrats do control the Senate. So how did a bill expanding the government’s power to listen to our phone calls without warrants get passed? Can anyone explain this to me?

Finally: "Legislation to shield reporters from being forced by prosecutors to reveal their sources was approved Wednesday by the House Judiciary Committee." I’m happy, but I don’t even want to hear from Judy Miller about this, or ever again, really.

There’s never a dull week in America.

 

 

Why doesn’t Kate Winslet have an Oscar?

kw.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amen. 

 

 

Pro-anorexia nation

"When you are actively in your eating disorder, you desperately want someone to understand, and a lot of time you find groups like the pro groups on Facebook that are supportive of you continuing your eating disorder."

21-year-old American Andrea Schneider, addressing the boom in pro-anorexia and pro-bulimia groups  not to be confused with support groups for those seeking recovery from their condition  on social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook.

Pro Ana Nation, a pro-anorexia MySpace group boasting more than 1,000 members, includes in its group rules that there must be "no people trying to recover, it ruins our motivation."  Facebook, another social networking site, has a group called "Get thin or die trying."  Both social networking sites have prohibitions against posting harmful content.

 

Going the distance

As summer winds down — and heats up — many of us find ourselves traveling to unlikely places by land or sea, even in our minds or on the (Web) page. However and wherever we journey, we usually encounter a few roadblocks and detours before we find ourselves exactly where we want to be.

In this month’s issue of InTheFray, we invite you to pile into our station wagon in cyberspace and join us for some reflective journeys around the globe. We begin by Rowing in place with Victor Mooney, who, as Michael Rymer discovers, is a bit concerned that others might consider him crazy for setting his sights on rowing across the Atlantic. But while Mooney’s journey might seem, on the surface, to be a fanatical quest for fame, there’s something more to his quest. Mooney rows long distances to cope with his family’s struggles with AIDS — and to shed light on the disease that has already killed one of his brothers and lurks behind another.

We then ride with Megan Stielstra to Prague, where she must come to terms with identifying herself as an American even while she feels anger at her own government. Over in Japan, we share Laura Hancock’s frustrations and joys as she desperately tries to find something she can achieve in a country where she can barely speak the language. And back in rural America, poet Shelley Getten recalls the boulders that made two sisters the strong women they became.

Rounding out this month’s stories are two book reviews: ITF Contributing Writer Sharlee DiMenichi reads Matthew Wray’s Not Quite White and discovers that the phrase “white trash” is No ordinary slur, while Jeremy Gillick tries to pinpoint the eye of the Balkan storm in his reading of the collaborative graphic novel Macedonia.

Coming next month: our special issue on the state of language in the 21st century.

Thanks for reading!

Laura Nathan
Editor

 

Who’s that lady?

Do you know a woman who is super exceptional? Perhaps a brilliant go-getter? A devout do-gooder? Or even just an all-around great gal?

Glamour wants to know about her. Between now and August 19, the magazine is accepting nominations for everyday women — community leaders, friends, colleagues, teachers, even editors — who inspire you. To learn more about Glamour‘s search for the Woman Of Your Year, click here. Or, if you just can’t wait to nominate a certain someone, by all means, go for it.

 

Danica McKellar is my new hero

Winnie Cooper grew up, got hot, and more importantly, got even smarter. She has a new book out called Math Doesn’t Suck, aimed at young teenage girls who struggle with the subject and are constantly exposed to ditzy celebutantes.

       "When girls see the antics of Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, they think that 
       being fun and glamorous also means being dumb and irresponsible," the 32-
       year-old McKellar told Newsweek for editions to hit newsstands Monday.  
       "But I want to show them that being smart is cool," she said. "Being good 
       at math is cool. And not only that, it can help them get what they want out
       of life."
 
I’m not the age demographic the book is aimed at, and unfortunately, incurably, I do suck at math. But I never tire of watching a great woman leave her mark on the world. I watched Kate Winslet and Jennifer Lopez make curves okay. I hope McKellar will be the first of many women to make intelligence fashionable. Hopefully someday, that’s the world my daughter will live in.  

 

Sweet 16ers aren’t so sweet

There are a lot of things wrong with today’s society. Thanks to my youthful naivety, I look to the future with optimism and hope. However, my buoyancy is conflicted as I am troubled by the next generation. Do today’s current teenagers have the foresight to correct the destruction left behind by the baby boomers?

My uneasiness is caused by many reasons, most of which, though, are clearly illustrated by the MTV series, My Super Sweet 16. Now, I don’t believe Sweet 16 is the root of youth’s corrupted spirit. But, the show’s premise is to showcase parents’ shameless display of extravagance while exposing their shortcomings. This failure in parenting has not only spawned a degenerate generation but revels in exploiting it for entertainment.

Sure, it’s easy to place blame on the parents. They’re responsible for instilling goodness and morality in today’s children, thus providing a strong foundation for tomorrow’s adults, right? That’s certainly easier said than done. I know it’s not entirely their fault that the prevalent parenting method is based in believing love is best demonstrated through gaudy status symbols. 

I can only hope all this materialism in place of parenting will provide fertile grounds for an eventual realization and rebellion. Finding this source of emptiness is what keeps therapists in business, no? More disconcerting than bad parenting, though, is the lack of role models to unearth this discontent.

In fact, Sweet 16 is a show about the inadequacy of current cultural role models. Using the Paris Hilton method of success, anyone with enough money can buy their way onto TV into the hearts and minds of impressionable young ones. And it’s the girls that are suffering the most from these disposable influences.

It used to be that a girl’s sixteenth birthday was a celebration for surviving the unforgiving journey from awkward adolescent to developed adult. But it seems to me that every character featured on Sweet 16 revels in acting and behaving like a spoiled child. In fact, most delight in dramatic tantrums and sinister bitchery for the television cameras.

Regardless of the legitimacy of the dramatics, the show illustrates an unsettling new level of bratty-girl behavior. Whereas boys use physicality and violence to bully, girls have always resorted to verbal attacks to belittle each other. This belittling was once done behind backs and with a slight sense of wrong-doing; today’s young girls are meaner than ever without any sense of remorse.

And this new level of bratty-girl behavior is not limited to extreme insults. Aggressiveness and domineering have surpassed catty putdowns to become the favored form of intimidation. Where did this perverted sense of female entitlement come from? Because I’m pretty sure Paris Hilton wouldn’t instigate, let alone win, a bitch fight with even the most "exhausted" Hollywood starlet.

 

Teen pregnancy in Texas

From Yahoo! News: "Texas leads U.S. in teen birth rate." When questioned about the state’s abstinence-based teachings versus comprehensive education, State Board of Education President Don McLeroy had this piece of wisdom: "The idea that just giving them a lot of information is going to solve it, I think, is kind of naive." Granted, informing hormonally-driven teenagers about condoms and such will not stop teen sex or pregnancy. But isn’t it more naive to tell these teenagers to not have sex at all, refusing to tell them even the basics about safe sex, knowing that teenagers have engaged in pre-marital sex since the beginning of mankind, and always will?