The Global Peace Index

The Global Peace Index, which ranks 120 nations according to their relative peacefulness, has just released the 2007 rankings. The index is put out by Vision of Humanity, a website that was just launched in support of the index.

Unsurprisingly and unfortunately, many of the lowest-ranking countries are from MENA (Middle East and North Africa). Iraq, of course, falls into last place (121), while Israel, Lebanon, Algeria, and Iran are all pretty low (although Iran practically tied with the United States they are ranked in the 96th and 97th places).

Morocco (48), on the other hand, was in the top 50, along with MENA friends Kuwait (46), UAE (38), and Qatar (30). Oman was the highest-ranking MENA country, falling into 22nd place.

Indicators used in the index include the number of internal and external wars fought, relations with neighboring countries, political instability, level of distrust of fellow citizens, and the number of arms per 100,000 people, among other things.

 

No whites allowed

Meet Matthew Jezierski: "[He] started a club in honor of a group he considers to be oppressed and undervalued: the white male. The Caucasian American Men of ASU grabbed attention thanks to the club's name, but Jezierski insisted it wasn't a white pride organization. Jezierski, who is fluent in Polish (he was born in the United States), said he only wanted to promote cultural awareness. He didn't understand why being of European descent is anything to be ashamed of."

Dude?

But that's not the whole story. The whiny-white-boy club is now over, and Jerzierski is too embarrassed to talk about it. Especially because he was someone else's bitch at the time: a younger Ann Coulter named Emily Mitchell. Mitchell was also ruled by a guiding hand, that of the ultra-conservative Leadership Institute, who pays people like Mitchell to recruit virgins, racists, pro-lifers, conservatives, and generally repressed Republicans on college campuses. Thankfully, as swayed as one can be in college, eventually they grow up and get minds of their own. If not, consider this scenario:

"Hi mom, I joined a club for white men only."
"Son, we've stopped the tuition check and changed the will."

Until then, however, Mitchell and her ilk can still find plenty of easily influenced minions. There are still plenty of college boys who have never:
•been stared at or threatened for dating someone of a different race.
•been stared at for walking into an establishment with the gall of being adifferent race.
•been followed by a security guard for shopping while black.
•been pulled over by cops for driving while black.
•been afraid to walk alone at night or had his "no" ignored.
•had ancesters who were chained in ships to be sold or held in death camps to be exterminated.
•experienced or felt a single negative thing in life because of their gender, religion, or skin color (aparently Polish jokes have just rolled right off Jezierski, but maybe that's because he is one all on his own).

Yet these nice boys still buy a load like this from a pretty blond: "It's about balance. The African American men…their name is equally divisive. They're excluding Caucasian men. The Caucasian population is declining by percentages making it a growing minority," Mitchell says. "He [Jezierski] speaks fluent Polish and was offended. There's a separate Latino studies or Chicano studies but nothing for people who are white in color. They don't have anything to represent Slavic or German studies. Why aren't European cultures considered diverse?"

First of all, Heidi, there are European studies programs at colleges and universities (literatrue, history, language, and clubs like the German Devils Deutsch Club, which Jezierski settled for). Outside of that, programs like women's studies and Chicano studies exist not to exclude contemporary white men, but because white men of the past two millenia have excluded them. From everything. And now in the somewhat enlightened 20th and 21st centuries, minorities are telling their side about existing on the same planet, past and present. It's only a problem for the whites like Mitchell who don't like it.

People like Mitchell also need to remember this: America does have a white-men only club  it's called the White House. 

 

Harry Potter and the Georgia housewife

Laura Mallory has spent the last couple of years, legal fees, and too many people's time trying to get the Harry Potter series removed from the shelves of the school libraries in Georgia. I don't really have to explain why, do I — witchcraft, children, bad, etc. The local school board shot her down, as did the state board, and now a superior court judge. Next stop — federal court.

Here's the best part — Mallory hasn't even read the books. She says she doesn't have time, what with not working and dropping kids off at school. But she does have time for an obsession with a harmless, fictional children's book that even Christian groups across the country have hailed as teaching good against evil.

"At Tuesday's hearing, Mallory argued in part that witchcraft is a religion practiced by some people and, therefore, the books should be banned because reading them in school violates the constitutional separation of church and state."

Let's start with this — witchcraft is not a religion. More specifically, Wicca and variations are practiced by people, have been recognized as a religion since 1974, and were recently allowed to display their religious symbols on soldiers' graves and remembrance walls. The "witchcraft" of Harry Potter, however, is not real at all. If there is someone out there who can wave a wand, say something in Latin, and suddenly a child sprouts a tail, I'd like to meet that person. Until then, what goes in a Harry Potter book has never and will never be considered a religion.

Next, Mallory argues the books violate the separation of church and state. For argument's sake, fine. But Mallory also says, "I have a dream that God will be welcomed back in our schools again." So, Harry Potter is not welcome due to violating church/state, but Mallory's Christian God should be? And here's what it's obviously about — a Christian stamping her feet about not having control over what other people's children believe (or don't). Georgia residents — pray for your tax dollars.

 

The Pope backtracks

“The change highlights the importance of inter-religious dialogue.”

Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Vatican Secretary of State, stating to the Italian newspaper La Stampa that the Vatican would rescind its previous decision and will restore the Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue as its own department.

Pope Benedict XVI downgraded the council, which addresses the Islamic world, in March 2006 and sent its president, Archbishop Michael Fitzgerald, to Cairo as a Papal Nuncio (diplomatic representative) to Egypt and to serve as the Vatican's representative at the Arab League in Cairo. By reversing his previous decision to merge the council with the Vatican's culture ministry, the Pope is clearly acknowledging the need to directly engage with the Islamic world, but it has not been announced whether he will also reinstate Archbishop Fitzgerald — a seasoned veteran in his former post — as head of the Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue.

 

Just another three-day weekend

Summer has arrived, and along with what has become the standard increase in gasoline prices, the greasy scents of funnel cake and hot dogs permeate the air. Today, I am celebrating the "official" start of summer, Memorial Day weekend, at a local water park. The weather is perfect — mid 80s, low humidity with a gentle breeze. From the look of the small crowd, it appears that the traffic person on the local news was correct in his prediction that most folks would be hitting the beaches instead.

Thinking about the crowds that have headed towards the Jersey Shore reminds me of another beach, one named Omaha. Why a landlocked midwestern city was selected as the code name of one of the five landing points during the Normandy invasion of World War II was something never discussed in my American history classes. As a matter of fact, what little I know about the United States' most expensive and possibly most supported war was learned from my father or on after-school specials.

It was from television that I learned about the internment of U.S.-born Japanese Americans in response to Pearl Harbor and America's formal entrance into the war. I can still feel the shock that assaulted my childish senses when I realized that my beloved country was capable of such an act. This betrayal was further intensified when taken in the context of the unity presented during the war. My father often spoke of the rationing, how children saved every bit of scrap metal they could find. Our recycling efforts now must seem so, well, tame by comparison. That is why a headline like "War Costs Money. Why Can't Politicians Say So?" in last week's Washington Post's Weekly Edition reminds me once again of how far from the reality of war that most of us reside.

While we could lay the blame on a president and political leaders who have chosen to pay for a war without raising taxes or requiring Americans to tighten the purse strings in other ways, the bottom line is that as a whole we have found it easier to follow the leader rather than strike out on our own. Common sense tells us that eventually we will have to pay for a war financed through loans. A huge deficit stares us full in the face and yet the party continues.

There was a lot I didn't learn in high school or at my parents' knee, such as how to truly participate in the political process, that one voice can indeed make a difference, and why truth is the basis for accountability. I try not to make the same mistakes with my own children. Errands are run based on location to avoid duplicate journeys, replacing a broken washer becomes a lesson on energy efficiency, walking is strongly encouraged. So when my son points out the fuel consumption of a Humvee, though hopeful, my heart doesn't race like it used to when my dad told of neighborhood ladies saving sugar coupons to make a birthday cake or the bravery of his uncle, who when separated from his fellow soldiers, endured days of freezing solitude broken only by the German voices that surrounded him. I guess it should be no surprise that sacrifices to support this war are not high on the agenda; after all, for many of us, working for the common good has never been considered as important as honoring the individual.

Here at the water park, the water is warm, the lemonade is fresh, and the sunscreen is plentiful. Another Memorial Day weekend, fun in the sun, the cashiers ringing up the orders. As I watch my two sons frolic in the waves, I remember something else they never taught us in high school exactly how did the Roman Empire fall? I think a little research is in order.          

  

 

Al Gore

Let me explain. Nothing would make me happier about the future of this country or the world than if Al Gore were to become president. I voted for him in 2000, and I would again in a second. But, as the Time article suggests, a transformation would have to take place. Gore would have to become a politician again. He couldn't be the passionate geek who has earned the respect of the world with what began as a slide show in 1989. He would have advisors, speech writers, analysts, PR people, Naomi friggin' Wolf telling him what colors to wear. He couldn't speak or move freely. He would have stop being Al Gore and start being president. And I like the man who can call our president a drug addict and dilettante without having a crowd of people running to do damage control. I like the unapologetic intellectual who has influence in every country to save our planet.
If Gore were president, he would have to deal with Iraq, and he would fail, at least to a point. It doesn't matter who is elected next, Iraq will damage him or her. At this point, I don't even think God himself could fix it and keep everyone happy. 

If Gore were president, he couldn't focus on global warming. And we need him to focus on that. It's what he does best, and he devotes his entire self to it. No one else, at least no one with the convincing energy and exposure, has or could do that. A president is pulled in every direction by every need — war, health care, poverty, the party, both Houses, the polls, economies, staff, other presidents and prime ministers, allies, and enemies. I have no doubt that Gore could do it, and well. I just think that someone else — Obama, Hilary, Edwards — could also do it well. But no one can do what Al Gore is doing now.
If you disagree, you're not alone, and there are two websites you can visit. DraftGore.com and AlGore.org have petitions to sign to get him to run and much more. If successful in convincing him, you all and Gore have my full support.

 

The obvious

I've always found it absurd when money is spent to do a study that finds obvious things such as "Racism Still Exists." There's only one word I can respond with, a perfect word, that I haven't really used since I was 12: Duh! I know it's not mature or intelligent, but to me it's perfectly fitting.

I came across another "duh" moment this week when I saw this headline: "Women's rights key to Africa AIDS crisis: study." My fellow Democrats, liberals, feminists, and users of common sense and logic have known this for years. If a woman has the right to say no, to use her own protection or insist that her unfaithful husband use protection, to have control over the body that she lives in, she will be in better health. The study focused on the failings of African governments in regards to women, but I can't help but think of our own country's failings for women around the world.

 

Idling vehicles bad for health and earth

With the average gas price at over $3, using less gas should be the norm, but many people still idle their cars, delivery trucks, or buses. This not only wastes gas but also spews out greenhouse gases and creates poor air quality like smog that’s unhealthy to breathe.

A 2003 New York City Council report compiled findings about idling engines. It found that idling a car for more than 30 seconds wastes gas and is not good for the engine. And "when viewed in the context of global warming, idling your car is about as responsible as fanning the flames of your burning house." Diesel fumes are the worst for adding to environmental as well as health degradation. This is especially of concern for school children who are exposed to diesel exhaust from school buses. New York City has the highest asthma rate in the nation and idling vehicles are one of the main contributors to this.

New York state and city have laws concerning idling. Under state law vehicles can’t idle for longer than five minutes unless for emergency purposes, if the engine is needed for maintenance, or to run an auxiliary function such as a loader. And the city’s law is similar except that vehicles cannot idle for more than three minutes.

But a quick stroll around the streets of New York show that many delivery trucks, such as mail or parcel delivery and food delivery, idle for much longer than three minutes. Often times they even block traffic, leaving their truck to idle in the road while they make their delivery.

But the city is trying to fight pollution and global warming. It uses hybrid buses for public transportation and a small percentage of taxicabs are hybrid too. Mayor Bloomberg recently made a splash by declaring that all taxicabs need to be green by 2012.

Idling vehicles are a big problem. Each individual can either contribute positively or negatively to this detriment. The easiest decision to make is to turn off your engine instead of leaving it to idle.

keeping the earth ever green

To read more about New York City’s commitment to clean transportation, click here.

 

 

 

Paying out the asthma

Seventeen years ago I woke my mom and aunt up with a problem: I wasn’t breathing normally. My mom worried because that’s what she did, and my aunt worried because she had one idea: asthma.

This was the beginning of what has been a wonderful life of wheezing, gasping, and taking steroids. And the best part is that I have to pay for inhalers  the devices that give medicine to asthmatics. I use this wonderful device because I need it to live.

So let me write this line and see if you’re as angry as I am: After insurance I get to pay $10-$30 a month to live. Not “live comfortably,” just “live.” And thanks to that wonderful, conservative idea of the “free market” (where corporate bailouts and subsidies are somehow allowed), there is a person out there making money off of me.

The idea of profiteering off of the illness of someone else is infuriating. I think of someone  a stock owner!  sitting on his ass collecting dividends or (even better) waiting until that hugely profitable moment when a bigger corporation buys his stock for an assload of money. Making this nightmare even better is the fact that if I don’t find affordable insurance in the next few years (I can stay on my dad’s until I’m 25), my inhaler cost will eat away my bank account quicker than a cake in Oprah’s greenroom.

My government does not care about this and continues to defeat any attempt to help everyone afford the cost of medical care. I am pretty sure I know why: Those people collecting dividends and making money off of my sickness, well, some of them are running for Congress. And, oh, it makes me feel great to know that.

When I was five I was told I could grow out of asthma, that it would improve with age, but it never has. I have a thousand triggers that can set off the panting/gasping sweat-storm that is a normal asthma attack for me. Luckily I only have one of these every couple of days, so I’m doing wonderful.

And when I lose my insurance and have to pay out the ass to live, it’ll warm my heart that I will be helping this generation of pharmaceutical stockholders buy BMWs, which is going to be a real comfort when my O2 stats drop.