Twitter gets political

Accessibility is definitely an area where Twitter has Facebook beat, and in the case of Iran its consequences are powerful. News agents are looking to Twitter and other social networking sites like YouTube to find their reports. And while these sources may not be confirmed, it’s nevertheless a constant stream of opinions and experiences.

Looking at Twitter and clicking on a discussion titled #iranelection – there have been 219 new comments added since I logged in (5 minutes ago). That is incredible. People are discussing protests, closures, incidences, reactions, experiences, and more. One tweeter writes encouragement for others to contribute and keep Iran at the top of Twitter’s discussion list. They’re using this medium to ensure that their struggles are not forgotten, and it seems to be working.

I just checked again, and there are now 440 more comments since I began this blog post.

I can only imagine how the Internet may have impacted past protests and revolutions had it been available, but that’s speculating on something we can never know.

However, today it seems quite clear that sites like Twitter and YouTube are having an impact within Iran and internationally. They’re inspiring hope, discussion, strategy, and motivation. If the rapid addition of tweets to this single feed is any indication, Iranians have managed to involve people from all over the world in their fight. While the resolution is still unsettled, it’s clear that the people of Iran are making themselves heard. And that’s pretty incredible stuff.

One last check – there’s now 1,717 comments added since I first went to the page. Wow.

P.S. See the blog Iran protest resources if you want to read more on Iran.

 

Do actions speak louder than Twitters?

 

Apparently a popular equation online amidst Iran's election has been "Tiananmen + Twitter = Tehran," which obviously places a heavy emphasis on the idea that twittering (or tweeting) has rounded up hundreds and thousands of people behind those protesting Iranians who feel robbed of their voices with the supposed re-election of Ahmadinejad.

It's true- everyday I receive at least 10 Twitter updates referring to online petitions I can sign, graphic icons I can create, and listservs I can join, all to show my support. Sometimes as I'm scrolling through them, I feel an indescribable sense of community, as if simply by reading I am declaring "Yes! I'm with you!" But to be honest, the sensation is fleeting.

Maybe it is the cynic in me, maybe it is the fact that I'm still not super Web-savvy like some of my peers (I only have 22 followers on Twitter after posting over 50 updates what am I doing wrong here?), but sometimes I can't help but still feel detached and skeptical about all of this hoopla on the Internet.

The first step to recognizing a problem is to be informed of it, of course, but what comes next? If all I do is read news updates every few hours and maybe link to them through Facebook, Twitter, or some other online social networking site, how much good does that do?  I may reach a fair amount of people, promoting awareness both to myself and others, but URLs don't necessarily perform the same functions as actually taking to the streets and rallying.

Or do they?

This past week, The Washington Post published an analysis of the above equation, posing a lot of my same concerns. Could it be that the Web has so changed the world, that much of our faith in activism can rely on blogging and reaching one another through the Internet? Is it safe to say that 1,000 online supporters will translate to 1,000 marching supporters?

Simple copy and pasting, RTing (retweeting), and forwarding somehow seems to me like it's taken the place of physical action and movement (you know, the kind you do with the whole of your body, not just your fingers) outside (as opposed to in a dark corner in your room or hunched over your iPhone). Also, I don't know how I feel about the quality of "news." With the constant need to be posting every 10 minutes (since "old news" seems to be anything three hours old), I've been reading some really random stuff. Interesting? Maybe. Newsworthy? Probably not. You can Twitter all day long and all you'll be left with is a public timeline with a million updates. 

It's easy to click a hyperlink, it's a little harder to leave our computer screens.

(An original and shorter version of this article was written for Asians in America Magazine, where I am the managing editor.) 

 

Transcending Jackie Chan

 

It's not hard to understand why the market for foreign films here in America isn't booming. It's not like independent foreign movies are selling out across the country. We like our typical roles just fine, don't we? The blonde bimbo, the Indian deli-owner, and the dragon-fanatic, karate-expert, math-genius Asian. 

I will admit that I don't know very much about Asian/Asian-American film. But because I was lucky enough to attend a few screenings as part of the New York Asian Film Festival (NYAFF), I've grown to really appreciate the Asian characters from the perspective of…Asian directors, producers, actors, audiences.

The NYAFF, which is brought to life by Subway Cinemas, features over 50 films, most of which were "hits" in many countries like Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Personally, I believe these films represent the truest of Asian life and experiences. This doesn't mean that all the movies have to do "Asian themes," like studying hard or being picked last in P.E. class. These Asian films celebrate life as simply as possible: being human.

The characters in many of NYAFF's films struggle with love and relationships, money and mishap, crazy shenanigans and late-night bar fights.  There isn't something overtly Asian about any of the films, nor did they try to be what they weren't (big-budget Western blockbusters). There was an honesty and a sincere desire to remain true to everyday life and the art of film-making. 

It's refreshing to not have to watch the same archetypes played over and over again. But this summer doesn't just have NYAFF (which ends in about a week). The IndioBravo Film Foundation brought the first Filipino Film festival a couple of weeks ago. Next month the Asian American International Film Festival (AAIFF) will take place over the course of three days, bringing to the screens some of the most organically-sound and independent Asian-American films.

It's very important to support festivals like these because they offer an alternative to the norm. And sometimes not just an alternative, but the reality.

Disney's Mulan was sort of on the right track. So whaddya say? Give the Rush Hour movies a rest, at least for a while.  

 

Help a sister out

You ever had one of those rough days at work where the only thing you can mentally or physically manage after leaving the office is plugging in your earphones and choosing the song "Take This Job and Shove It" on your iPod?

Today was one of those days.

The good thing about riding the subway in a situation like this is that, if the trains aren't too crowded, I can actually decompress on the way home. The same cannot be said about sitting white-knuckled in bumper-to-bumper traffic breathing exhaust fumes. And as luck would have it, a seat opened up just as I was boarding the 2 train. I leaned my head against the wall, closed my eyes and went to my happy place.

There is a certain lulling quality to the rhythm of the train, especially when it builds up speed in the tunnel under the East River. (See "Cure Insomnia, Save the World" post.) So I was a little surprised and embarrassed, when I squinted one eyelid open to make sure that I wasn't somewhere in Bed-Stuy (which, if I'm being honest with you, I have done before), to be eye-to-bellybutton with a ginormous pregnant woman.

How long had she been standing over me secretly coveting my seat, her aching back and swollen feet longing for some relief? I got up quickly and she seemed grateful rather than annoyed at my obliviousness. After my self-satisfaction at helping my fellow neighbor wore off, I wondered why no one else in the vicinity had offered his or her seat.

That brings me to the unspoken subway code outlining who should get a seat, which I thought was well ingrained into the commuter's psyche:

  • Pregnant women, if they are obviously pregnant.
  • The elderly, but not just your average AARP member. We're talking white hair and possibly a cane. Sixty is the new 40.
  • Anyone of any age who is infirm. This includes crutches, blind with walking sticks, and neck braces.
  • A parent who is carrying a baby or has a baby strapped in a snugly. Not applicable if the child is in a stroller.

Not having ridden mass transit while pregnant, I decided to conduct an informal and highly subjective survey from the test group called Women I Know. I'm sad to report that apparently pregnant women end up standing more often than not. There is the understandable awkwardness of trying to decide if a woman in early stages of pregnancy is indeed with child or just, how can I say this gracefully, Rubenesque. But I was amazed to learn about the blatant disregard for weary travelers.

Of the hundreds of rides taken by my respondents while pregnant, they each could count on one hand the number of times a seat was immediately offered, and of the occasions they were given a seat, the generosity was bestowed either by a man of color or a teenager. (Teens do have a conscience…) Evidently white men rank lowest on the list of seat-giver-uppers, and women of all colors are not far behind. (Come on, women, help a sister out!)

One noteworthy incident involved a ride on the Metro North commuter train during which a woman was saving two seats on either side for her friends. Facing the prospect of standing for a 40-minute ride, my very pregnant friend asked for a seat to no avail. Finally a woman tucked into a corner relinquished hers, causing my friend to squeeze in front of several other people to get to it. The train doors closed with the "saved" seats still available.

Not long ago some Columbia University sociology students conducted a subway experiment. They had to approach seated New Yorkers, look them in the eye and ask them to give up their seats without any explanation. This, I think, is third on the list of things most feared right after public speaking and death. But here's the kicker: with very few exceptions, every person gave up their seat, no questions asked! Whether the students were tailed home and given a once-over, was not reported in the results.

 

Change me today, love me tomorrow

 

So Chastity Bono is transforming into the new and perhaps improved Chaz Bono. Yip, being lesbian just didn't cut it. Fourty years of life in a woman's body was so torturous that she prefers to chop off her lactiferous lumps and grow a penis. Cher, if she accepts their little 40-year-old girl undergoing a sex change, is probably busy sitting in the hospital waiting room, redrafting the "I've Got You Babe" lyrics:

 They say you are old and the truth will show

Through the complications of being a male Bono

Who cares about the fuss, do what in your heart is true

And we'll still love you no matter what you do

Babe, you got us babe

You got chest hair babe

Oh lord help my babe….

Humor aside, transgender surgery is a serious issue and often controversial. It really is amazing what medical advancements can do. You can almost become anyone you want to be, change any part of you that you are unhappy with, mold your face into one that resembles your favorite celebrity, slice off bits, add bits or change bits to your lover's approval…whatever you wish.

Does it make you more confident? Does it help you fit in? Does it make you feel loved? Does it make you happier?

We tell ourselves that we do these things to make ourselves happy, but happiness doesn't require all that pain, humiliation, societal ostracism and extremity. I'm not an expert on knowing how it feels to be a man trapped in a woman's body, but honestly I wouldn't know whether I was meant to be a man or I was just unhappy with being a woman. We don't pluck our eyebrows instead of wearing them bushy across our whole forehead or stick contacts in our eyes instead of wearing those nerd-magnet glasses because it makes us happier; it just makes us more "likable," makes us feel that we can love ourselves a little more because others would approve of the change.

Nine years ago when I entered high school, I had no friends whatsoever. One or two people would talk to me but not without making me the butt of their new joke to their own circle of friends. Lunch times were spent in the library, free time was spent with my nose in a book, and teams were normally chosen without me causing my teacher to be mediator and assign me into the first one that squirmed. So that year I made the resolution to change. I threw out my Stephen Hawkings and filled my shelves with overpriced Cosmopolitan magazines; I made a bed for myself in front of the TV and wrote down lists of the cute jock-type actors that seemed to be popular in the school corridors so that I could float around throwing their names into arb conversations:

"Yoh, screw maths, one day I'm gonna screw Freddie and create my own subjects."

It made me one of the more popular girls in school; it also made me fail some subjects in my last year. The truth is that I never actually changed because changing wasn't what I needed to make me like and accept myself. It didn't make me happier in the true sense; it just made others like me. Reading made me happy, and a monthly diet of Cosmopolitans did not satisfy me, which made me watch more and more mindless TV until I was so engrossed that I couldn't tell who I was any more. I ran away from who I really was because it made others like me. When you hide from something you love, it doesn't make you stop loving it; it just makes you forget how good you felt when you were doing something you loved. Of course I can't say the same for Chaz. Only he understands his decision. I don't.

 

I am Neda

 

I do not mean to intrude, and I do not mean to be disrespectful, but when a young woman is killed just for standing up for her beliefs, it is absolutely my business and I will speak out.

I respect Iran and Iranian culture, but I have no respect for a regime that rigs elections and then kills people who protest the travesty.  

I have nothing against Islam, nothing against Muslims, but I have a big beef against the people who force women to the sidelines and then accuse others of being the "great Satan."

I am Neda and I am here for the Iranian people.

 

The first step is admitting…

 

In a previous post of mine I talked briefly about the history of the Philippines and how it was marked by long periods of colonialism and military occupation, and followed by decades of corrupt government administration (which still remain in power today).

To be honest, I couldn't blame Filipino Americans for feeling somewhat confused in regards to cultural loyalties: are we Western because we were colonized by Spain and by the United States? Do we reject those Western influences because of the degradation and mistreatment that we suffered? Or am I nationalist, standing behind the country of the Philippines despite their unfaithful government officials? 

As an immigrant, am I to separate the image of the U.S. as "world police" from their image of "the land of opportunity"? My parents, both of them coming from the Philippines during the 1970s, have all but dashed any memories of what it was like "back home." While they don't necessarily refuse to ever talk about what it was like growing up there, they don't voluntarily ever bring up much of their past homeland. It's old news to them.

But for me, I don't get the vibe that "they are too good" now that they are here in America. It's not an "I'm better than that now" attitude that keeps them from remembering. A part of me feels like they are over that time in their lives, where they walked miles on dirt paths in dilapidated sandals just to get to school, and ate nothing but rice and salt for weeks. After all, what's so great about mulling over those days? 

However, a part of me feels as though there's a little more to it. It's one thing to remember humid afternoons spent hungry and without fresh water. But it's another thing to admit to a history of oppression and struggle. I don't know how much Philippine history they were taught; maybe not much at all. Hell, even here in the U.S., you barely hear ANYTHING about the Philippines. And when you do, it's about how great America freed the country from the grasps of Spain, the big bad wolf. Lo and behold, the history stops there: you don't hear of how the U.S. dipped their greedy hands into the cookie jar.

I can't say that I'm surprised. For a very long time I've felt sort of like two different people in one body. I felt so disconnected from my Filipino heritage, almost to the point that I could up and leave it and never look back. It was a sort of sad and empty feeling. But ever since I opened my eyes to where I came from, where my family and my people came from, I have never wanted to lose sight of it.

Although it's a rather tragic history to acknowledge, it informs me in more ways than one. Of course, I am not a different person altogether, but I know things and I am aware of things that have not only changed my perspective on what it means to be Filipino, but also what it means to be American. 

In a way it's true that ignorance is bliss. But when it comes down to it, all that's part of the void is sorely missed.  

(And while this may be a tad random, I wanted to draw attention to the release of a brand new book and the first of its kind: a book entitled Filipino American Psychology: A Handbook of Theory, Research and Clinical Practice. It examines the psyche of Filipino Americans as well as the reasons for their virtual "invisibility" in social sciences.)

 

The kid that stays blazed: part 1

The Brooklynite was no longer a silhouette, a figure that faded into the curtains and backdrops of music venue stages. The shadow that usually steered clear of the spotlight and blended into the menagerie of horn and string instruments was to be revealed. Brian Bonz, a native of the ensemble of backup bands, was to meet me in the flesh to discuss the formation of his very own band, the release of their debut record, and his sort of self-imposed promotion to leader and frontman.

 

I had previously met him at past shows, but he was always under the guise of "that guy in the Goddamn Band, as in Kevin Devine…and the Goddamn Band." Talented and versatile on stage, he never alluded to any kind of star quality. Far from it.

He was thankful and naturally spoke fondly of the rest of the band as though he was a publicist for it, more than an integral part of it. I wondered as I awaited his arrival at Park Slope's Bar 4, Would the transition to main mic prove to be a grand unmasking of the real Brian Bonz?

Rolling Papers 

Alone at the bar, halfway through a bottle of Woodchuck Cider, I glanced at a clock hanging over the entrance. I made out the numbers of the aging antique piece.

6:45 p.m. He was fifteen minutes late.

Suddenly the door swung in as Bonz tumbled forward at an awkward angle, as though he overestimated how heavy the door actually was and pushed way too hard. His dark jewfro curls swayed to and fro as he gained his balance and made his way towards me. At about 5'8", his big-boned body was outfitted like a typical Brooklyn singer-songwriter: an incorrectly buttoned flannel shirt, American Apparel grey hoodie, and a shabby corduroy blazer.

He flashed a hazy half-smile my way and motioned to the bartender, Pete, that he'd like a pint of Blue Point Ale. Originally starting out as a regular customer at Bar 4, Bonz eventually was hired as a part-time bartender and sound guy by Pete, who not only co-owns the place, but also happens to be one of Bonz's longtime friends.

"When I heard you'd get to work two oww-ahhz [hours] early, I needed to see it to believe it!" said Pete, smacking the palm of his band on the bar.

A Brooklyn accent continued when Bonz quickly shot back with a laugh, "Well, I'm fawkin' [fuckin] here, ya see?" Lively, humorous, and expletive-filled banter like this between him and Pete seeped in and out of my conversation with him that night.

Bonz was a spacey, chameleon-like character, switching on and off from different topics overdone paninis, the demise of the Staten Island punk rock scene, the rising prices of pot, etc. and frequently staring into oblivion for a couple of seconds before I got his attention again. Although I could have attributed his somewhat cloudy mindset to his "smoking," his laid-back, go-where-the-wind-takes-me vibe seemed to be a part of his personality more than I thought.

Before forming Brian Bonz and the Dot Hongs, a mellow indie-folk band comprised of everything from harmonicas and trombones to keyboards and the occasional triangle, he had played in other Brooklyn indie bands ("Brooklyn has always been in my bones") like Pablo, where he drummed, and Kevin Devine and the Goddamn Band, where he did a little bit of each backup instrument. Every musical project he was involved in also happened to be with friends. "Ever since I was a kid, I'd just sort of float around from one band of friends to another," he recalled. "Sometimes we'd jam, sometimes we'd record…at the end of the day, it was just us doing what we loved."

The sparks of creativity and inspiration were not just in himself alone, but a result of the artistic collaborations of those colleagues who felt more like family than just neighborhood rat-packs. When Pablo and Kevin Devine began to draw larger crowds and sell out shows, Bonz naturally went along for the ride, touring nationally, seeing faces and places he thought he'd never get the chance to see in his wildest Brooklyn dreams.

"I'd be playing and contributing in everyone's set on stage, kind of cross-pollinating my way to new bands and branching out to new fans," Bonz said as he lapped the last drop of his beer, before hailing for another. An old Smashing Pumpkins tune oozed out of the speakers above us. I, too, was on my second drink. A couple more people had shuffled into the bar by now. "But I knew I wanted to take a step back from being a frontman, I wanted to stay in the backseat for a while longer."

Stay tuned for parts 2 and 3 later this month…

 

 

Collateral damage: part two

"How do we know the attacks are over?" a woman asks.

Her hospital stay was preceded by an overdose of opiates.  A double mastectomy, chemo, and radiation knocked out that part of her reptilian brain devoted to survival.  She’s in her fifties, with disheveled gray hair.  A bright purple blouse flutters to her waist like a deflated foil birthday balloon. Residual glue from electroconvulsive therapy electrodes sticks to her temples; tufts of hair stick to the glue.  This lends an unfortunate comic air to her otherwise forlorn appearance.  She huddles into a chair.  We’re supposed to help her feel safe. 

“What if they bomb us here?”

“How do we know this is real?”

“Yeah, what if they staged it?”

They look to us for answers.  While it seems unlikely that terrorists have much interest in Portland, Oregon, none of us feel safe.  We do, however, know it’s real and we have nothing to offer except words, soothing and hollow, words that don’t reflect our internal landscapes, our churning dread and apprehension.    

The attacks resonate with my own terror of being trapped on an airliner going down; my fears go back to my childhood.  In third grade we train to "take cover" during air raid drills.  It’s cold down there on the floor under our small desks, but not as cold as the Cold War.  The desks are barely wide enough to contain our length, scalp to feet.  We cover our heads with our arms and tuck our legs up under our bodies.  I’m young, but not so young as to believe that this will help if an atom bomb falls on us.  Depending on what we’re made of – brick, glass, flesh – and how far we are from ground zero, we’ll incinerate, liquefy, or vaporize.

Sometime that afternoon, my father calls.  I keep him in a nursing home in Portland, as if I own him and have that right.  In the twilight of our relationship, he’s hobbled by dementia and doesn’t remember how to use the remote control or how to end a phone conversation.  He’s a captive audience.  We weep about the city we know so well we can walk its streets in our dreams and never get lost.  I call the nursing station and ask them to hang up my father’s phone and turn off his television.  Other than that morning, he’s been doing well, the charge nurse informs me.

When I leave the ward that afternoon, a hunger overwhelms me.  I want to hold tight to something innocent, a void so young and pure it’s untouched by breath or fingertip; it has no history, no double helix, no DNA.  I visit my father.    

The next morning everyone is haggard.  The emergency room has filled and emptied and filled again during the night.  We have no empty beds.  Disturbed sleep and dark dreams prevail.  The hospital ramps up staffing as aftershocks shift our roots from shared foundations – the common expectation of safety on our own soil.  The first group on the first morning after 9-11 tallies nightmares – a Ground-Zero litany for the mentally ill:     

“My house crumbled with me in it.”

“I was burned alive.”

“A baby floated through the air toward me.  It had no arms or legs.”

“I jumped out of a window, but I woke up before I hit the ground.”  

In the big picture, I’m a bit player, an editor in the narrative version of their lives.  I enter in the middle of the story, do a brief cut-and-paste, and move on.  My tools are limited: medication and conversation, as much art as science.  I’m a conduit: the scalpel, the IV bag, the splint that holds the fractured psyche together until the crisis passes and the patient can stand on his own. 

There’s always the question: what separates us from them, staff from patients?  Any answer anchored in hard science is a long way off.  Other than that, there are different answers on different days.  On some days what separates us is a matter of degree.  Anyone who experiences an emotional toll – the loss of a child, a life-threatening illness, the turmoil of divorce – knows how fragile sanity seems at times, and rests well when the chill of danger passes.  One morning you wake up and understand you’ve averted disaster. 

I know it’s unlikely I’ll experience the horrors that bring men and women to the ward because whatever trigger, genetic marker, or errant DNA, whatever neurotransmitter in whatever area of the brain has done this to them has not done it to me.  Whether by luck or design, I remain upright.  

The emotional and physical boundaries that are essential on September 10th mean less on September 11th.  On September 10th, the physicians, nurses, and therapists on the ward have the power to say who’s mad.  It’s easy – anyone who sleeps on this thirty-bed ship of fools is mad.  What separates us on September 11th is just this: precious little.  For a brief period of time, shared disaster obliterates the biological and cultural contexts of mental illness.  What we have in common is greater than what distinguishes us from each other.  Jets crash into the familiar landscape of my childhood and carefully established roles change, patients and staff coalesce, one superimposed on the other.     

On September 10th sanity is a worldview, a consensus.  Madness requires witnesses. On September 11th we are all witnesses, sane or mad.

*

At this writing, seven September 11ths have come and gone.  Life moves on and away for those of us who shun the political drama and morally confused pageantry of what is now a more private sorrow.

On another brilliantly clear, splendidly warm day in Portland, in another clinical setting, it’s September 11th again.  A young man enters my office.  There are outward signs that he takes antipsychotic medication: tremors, fatigue, a broad abdomen, but vestiges of the handsome boy remain.  Although he’s making progress toward his goals, this morning he sweats profusely and he’s hypervigilant.  He startles when my phone rings.  He requests a prn – a medication dispensed as needed to treat transient symptoms of anxiety or agitation.

“It’s September 11th,” he says.  On the television in the day room, another group of patients watch the towers fall.    

 

Overheard on the subway, part 3

Riding the Q train, crossing the Manhattan Bridge

Twenty-something woman talking on her cell phone:   I'm just exhausted, like really stressed. (Audible sigh) I know I just need to slooww down…I dunno…If I could just get some kind of disease. Not like a really nasty one or anything. Something where I could just sleep for like a week…Right, like mono. You know anyone who has that?

 

Birds of a feather sipping together

Our discussion roams from here to there but always comes back to our common interest: putting words on the page. She has her perspectives and I have mine; we can’t always agree yet we don’t often argue. It could be fun to argue – in that way that isn’t actually about aggression, just a sort of determination and challenge – but instead we analyze and compare and try to derive a theory, which gives a more quiet satisfaction.

A lot of it is forgettable, yet that’s not the point.

Those late nights are about the high of sharing your thoughts and ideas with someone who gets it, someone who empathizes. It’s like an injection to the system that says “yes, you can” and “yes, I will.” It’s the reasons why friends, clubs, meetings, groups, and classes that match your interest are fantastic for the creative juices.

Birds of a feather flock together. In fact, I think they feed off each other – whether it’s arms out and shouting about their passions or hunched over in a quiet discussion. Introverted or extroverted, there’s still an excitement that wants to be shared. In fact, it grows the more it’s expressed.

I’m not saying a different perspective isn’t a good thing; it’s a great thing and very grounding. However, it’s fun to take off with a bird of my own feather and just fly around. It’s worth the effort to find people who match you so well. Sharing interests with friends can lead to more than conversation: ideas get sparked and enthusiasm is nourished.

I love the all-night talk. Drown that tea till another pot needs making, and then make another. I suggest Earl Grey with a bit of milk, no sugar. A cookie on the side wouldn’t hurt either.

 

Who owns your culture?

 

The May-June 2009 issue of Utne featured an article discussing a particular German weekend activity involving about 40,000 "hobbyists" who model their lifestyles on Native Americans. They:

"…spend their weekends trying to live exactly as Indians of the North American plains did over two centuries ago. They recreate tepee encampments, dress in animal skins and furs, and forgo modern tools, using handmade bone knives to cut and prepare food….Many feel an intense spiritual link to Native myths and spirituality, and talk about 'feeling' Native on the inside."  

While Native American culture has been an influence in Germany due to books by best-selling German author Karl May and reflects Germans' desire to have a deeper connection to the spirit of Mother Nature and the environment, many Natives have been offended by how their culture seems to be re-envisioned and misappropriated by those hobbyists. Religious ceremonies are sometimes blasphemed and sacred items are supposedly treated like collector's edition regalia. 
 
When does initial reverence take an evil turn into sacrilege or, more commonly, stereotyping? Does a community own the rights to its own culture?
 
If you're familiar with Edward Said's Orientalism, then you'll have run into these types of questions. Said argues that even as far back as Christopher Columbus' time, cultures (and he specifically cites the Far East) have been misappropriated and reinterpreted for the benefit of another (in his case, the West). The West would "orientalize" the East, portraying "Orientals" as inferior, mysterious, and dangerous. Simultaneously, because of this surrounding mystique, products from the East were coveted. In a way, the West owned the "Oriental" culture, manipulating and molding it into what they wanted it to look like. 
 
In today's consumerism-driven society, I think Asian culture is owned all the time. Certain teas are marketed as "made from authentic Asian herbs," as though that automatically means it must be good. New York City's Chinatown, while not the cleanest of places, is sometimes seen as dark, crime-ridden, and mystical by tourists.  C'mon now. Really? Is the world still under the impression that Asian is synonymous with all that stuff Said said? 
 
For more, in my opinion, rather outrageous ownership of Asians/Asian culture in mainstream America, see the following:
 
A. Pearl River Mart (in SoHo, on Broadway, in NYC): a store chock full of gimmicky Asian goodies like commercialized kimonos (?), trendy chopsticks (?), and chic rice cookers (?). A glance at their YELP page reveals praise with reviewers (most non-Asian) dubbing it as an "oohh and awwww" store, claiming "you make me wish I was Asian!" and calling its products "Chinese notions." 
 
B. The infamous 2008 Six Flags commercial , featuring an Asian man saying "Mo' Flahhg, Mo' fuuhhn!" Yeah, cause we all talk like that. Obv. 
 
C. A very recent KFC Grilled Chicken commercial, featuring normally dressed people applauding the product. EXCEPT, two Asian men who are dressed as though they are about to engage in Kung-Fu battle and also speak in gibberish that I guess is meant to simulate Asian accents? That doesn't stick out like a sore thumb. 
 
 
 
 
 

personal stories. global issues.