Features

 

Scenes from a party in Uganda

Learning all about life in Kampala during a night of drinking and dancing.

 

“How is it that you do not have any children, Jennifer?”

I thought about it for a second, bewildered. It was a question I’d never been asked before, considering that I was 27 and not yet married. Then again, this was the first time that I’d made polite conversation at a party in Uganda, a country where most women are married by age 17 and the average woman has seven kids.

I visited Uganda last December to attend meetings for a reproductive health network in East Africa as part of my work for a Washington, D.C. nonprofit that advocates for women’s reproductive health issues. It was my first time in Africa and only my second time abroad, so to say that I wasn’t sure what to expect was the understatement of the century. I imagined exploring local villages, visiting health clinics, and meeting the people that my organization supported. Instead, it was day four and all I’d seen was the over-air-conditioned conference room of my hotel, where I’d sat in all-day meetings discussing policy with regional officials. Not exactly the eye-opening experience I’d been expecting. A conference room is a conference room, no matter what part of the world it’s in.

But things were looking up now that I’d finally been let out of the hotel. Our meetings were over; I still had three days in Kampala ahead of me, and our Ugandan hosts were throwing a party to celebrate all our hard work. In the United States, business meetings end with a handshake and the mutual signing of contracts; in East Africa, they end with a party, complete with a DJ, an open bar, and dancing. In another stark contrast to American business practices, the guests at this party actually let loose and had a good time. This was no stuffy affair filled with empty speeches and pretense; this party was truly an opportunity to break out of the rigid formality of our meetings and “get to know each other as brothers and sisters,” as one of the group’s leaders explained it. It looked like I was finally about to learn more about the country that I’d flown halfway around the world to experience.

We were still in a hotel, but this one was a little more inviting than the one I was staying in. The party was in a third-floor party room, complete with a beautiful veranda overlooking a garden. Brilliant fuchsia blossoms bloomed from vines twisting around the veranda’s railing, and you could hear the steady hum of insects mingling with the distant roar of Kampala’s ever-present traffic jam. We all converged at the veranda’s bar, tipping back our heads to drink to the success of our meetings.

Throwing myself headfirst into the festivities, I started chatting with a group of young government officials who were more than eager to tell me more about life in Uganda. Twenty minutes later, I somehow got caught up in a conversation about the state of my fertility with Joseph, a short Ugandan man with piercing brown eyes and a boyish grin. I told him I was getting married in April and that I was waiting to have children until I was ready. “I guess America is different,” I said. “A lot of American women like to wait until we’ve experienced life and had a career before we get married and start a family.”

Joseph was incredulous. He shook his head slowly, convinced that I was putting a happy face on my clear failures as a woman. He looked so sad for me that I started trying to convince him that I really was happy. How did I get to the point in my life where I had to defend my life decisions to a guy at a party in Kampala? “So, how many kids do you have?” I asked playfully, trying to turn the conversation back to him.

“Only five. Three girls and two boys.”

“Only five? Sounds like a lot to me.” I was pretty sure that Joseph was younger than I was. How did he have five kids already?

“Is not so many, my brother has eight. I have to catch up!” Joseph wasn’t joking.

“So, who is taking care of them right now?” (It was 10 o’clock on a Wednesday night.)

“They are with their mothers.” Mothers. Slowly I teased out of him that he was married, but also had kids with a mistress. Not only that: He spent a few nights a week going out dancing and drinking without his wife, but not without female companionship, if you catch my drift.

I made the joke that if my fiancé did that, he wouldn’t be my fiancé anymore. “Why not?” he asked. Joseph was genuinely bewildered. The other people in our little group all stared at me like I was crazy. I was starting to feel like a judgmental prude.

“What is wrong with going out?” one woman asked me, curiously.

Good question. What was wrong with “going out” if both parties involved are okay with it? I’d read about infidelity in Ugandan culture and always imagined that it was the men who were “at fault” and the women were victims. Could it be that women were just as likely to be cheating? Was it really cheating, or did relationships just work differently here?

And that was when I realized that throughout our entire conversation, I’d been judging Joseph based on my American perceptions of how a relationship between a man and a woman should be. Now, I don’t know what Joseph’s wife thought about his infidelity, or if she even knew about it, but after talking to a dozen different people of both genders at this party, I did know that Ugandans had a very different stance on infidelity. And these were the people who worked in reproductive health, the people who know that having multiple concurrent partners raises the risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease and who had devoted their careers to educating their peers of this fact.
 
By assuming that a woman should be offended (if not incensed) by her partner’s infidelity, I was viewing Joseph’s relationship through a lens tinted with my own cultural biases. Even worse, it was keeping me from really understanding what it was like to live in Kampala, which was the whole point of my trip.

I felt like the people I hated: Americans who travel abroad and then spend the entire time limiting their experience to fit preconceived notions of how things should be, rather than opening their minds to new adventures, new friendships, and a greater understanding of the world. Traveling in a self-contained bubble isn’t any different from staying home; by filtering your experiences, you aren’t really experiencing anything.

So I smiled and said, “Nothing’s wrong with going out, it’s between you and your wife.” The group of us then took a shot of what Joseph called Ugandan Orange, a very strong whiskey-like liquor distilled from oranges, and I left the rest of my preconceptions at the bar. The music started pumping loudly from the dance floor — it’s not an African party if there isn’t dancing, I learned — and we all hit the dance floor, singing along to Madonna’s “Holiday.” (Knowing all the words made me quite the popular dance partner!) We stood in a circle, teaching each other dance moves and laughing the night away, forgetting the ways we were different and relaxing into our new friendships, all to an ’80s pop soundtrack.

In one night of drinking and dancing in Kampala, I learned more about what it was like to live there than I did during the entire first half of my trip. More importantly, by shedding some of my preconceived notions, I was able to view the rest of my trip through the eyes of Joseph and my other new friends, opening myself to really learning about the country and its people.

I might not have been in what my new friends would have called a happy “relationship,” but the men and women I danced with that night sure were. After all, who am I to judge? I’m 27 and I don’t even have any children yet!

 

 

Where the Moon Is a Hole in the Sky

Best of In The Fray 2008. A woman journeys into the heart of her ancestry’s homeland.

In the nights before, fear moves in like a heavy blanket. I sweat through the insomnia, become aware of surges of blood, a banging in my heart.

I will go alone with a backpack, crammed with clothes that can be layered in unpredictable weather, notebooks of various sizes, an iPod with audio books, and one pair of carefully selected shoes.

On the way to the airport, my hands shake. I will them into stillness by shutting out thought. I am all body, moving through space and time, strong with my pack riding behind with everything I imagined I would need, to a place I know almost nothing about. I go on impulse.

Morning in Frankfurt I half-sleep on an airport bench, with my head on the pack and Tolstoy’s sentences unwinding through my earphones, my eyes pulsing with exhaustion. Two men stand in the hot light coming in through large windows, and they light cigarettes. I watch smoke leave their mouths as they speak in a language I don’t know, and the smoke becomes the image of unfamiliar words — sound, sight, and smell curling and rising.

On the plane I let the sound of Lithuanian come over me, like drapes, I think. I am closed inside and it is dark, and when I peek out I am seeing Lithuania for the first time. Trees at twilight. They are pines. Will I learn what they are called? Will I know their name in Lithuanian?

How did my friend say it when I said where I was going? Searching for a mystical genealogical connection, he said, and we laughed, though in different words that may be what I want.

The darkening city, the black silhouette of the TV tower. Grayness seems to rise out of the streets. Graffitied walls. Factories and smokestacks. Corner gas stations lit like bright rooms in an otherwise darkened house. I want to be invisible, to put myself in a place I have never been, to be far from America. Hitchhikers at night on highway AI outside the city wear open jackets, small backpacks hung over hunching shoulders. They seem a sign of my restlessness, my desire to be out under the actual sky. I want beauty. I want difficulty. At roadside cafés under yellow awnings, night travelers tip back in their chairs or lean in close at small tables. I want to know what they speak of. To know the look and the smell of them. To ask questions. To get close to Lithuania, the Lithuanians, their language.

Midnight on the north side of Klaipėda I go to bed in the rented flat, through double doors with stubborn locks, in a room where the air holds still, silence filling the space like water in glass. I lie there and begin a sleep that will last through the night and into the next midday, my sleep deepened by the other sleepers, hundreds of us inside these old gray Soviet buildings, shoulder to shoulder, almost near enough to hear the waves of the Baltic Sea and inside an old soul of Lithuania.

The peninsula dangles from the Lithuanian coast, curving out as if fluttering in wind, narrowing at its bottom, enclosing to the east the waters of a lagoon, while on the west the Baltic washes its white sand. This is where I begin. Not inner-country, the map I had studied again and again, the highlands in the east and lowlands in the west, the rivers draining down into the big valley of the Neman.

Out here is an in-between place made of wind, moving sand, and reforested hills, a place for the sunrise and sunset, of solstice celebrations. On Witches’ Hill, near an oak sculpture called Egle, Queen of the Grass-snakes, my daughter, who has been absent from my mind, suddenly fills it. Will she ever see Lithuania? Will it matter to her as it has to me that generations ago our family came from here? She is so small still. She misses me, I can feel it.

Here is the hill where Thomas Mann stayed in his summer cottage, looking over the lagoon, writing Joseph and His Brothers. How tall were these pines then? Could the great writer see into the water?

I can be the nobody I can’t be at home. No one speaks in English. Words tickle across my hair, my neck. Get what I would like and need by pointing and gesturing — the glass of Švyturys beer and cepelinai, a zeppelin-shaped dumpling stuffed with meat. Small words of an in-between language form in my throat. I am making sound but not language.

I didn’t quite expect to be a wife. Never a mother. I became those things as they met me, inventing as I go. Teacher, yes, I expected because of the familiar, what people in my family did, how they made their living. An American Midwest family staying in one place. Had we been there forever? There were whispers of travelers, stories not wanting to be told, counterpoints to sunlight and rich farmland, sports, church, and savings bonds, fixing up the house you were to stay in always. But there were leavings, darker places. Travelers on the forested margins.

On Parnidzio Dune on the peninsula, a panorama: the lagoon, pine forests, and the moving dunes rolling down to the south, toward Kaliningrad, a piece of Russia retained on the Baltic. I trade watching with the Russian watchtower that rises from a dune on an equal high point. A historical sign in poor English tells the story of the Valley of Death below, where French prisoners died in the sand.

When the eye takes in this much, the mind slows to one frame at a time. Sundial at hilltop, scrubby bushes held secure by mesh frames placed for reforestation, the villageness of Nida, salmon-colored rooftops. What could be seen from the watchtower? Would a sustained focus see the sand re-form, the borders shift? Over there, the moon lifts up. It is half with the light of a full.

First look at the countryside outside Klaipėda. First thought, familiar. Any Midwesterner would know this place, its fields, its wooded patches along small creeks, its farmhouses or small settlements of family homes. But what is this? An enormous gray building with broken windows? Is this where Russia used to live?

Church of the Annunciation in Kretinga — I am seeing from a distance, seeing the church building as Renaissance art, seeing the friary that had been closed by the Soviets and not so long ago returned to the Franciscans. I am giving money to the beggar woman with her knees bent on old Styrofoam. I am buying a rosary from the stout vendor shaped like my grandmother. I am dipping my hand in the holy water, sign of the cross, genuflect, sit in a pew and can’t see, go to the front, I am showing off. I am at Mass in Lithuania and I feel at home — I know this church. Moment of boldness. The little Catholic girl in me goes down on her knees in front of the altar, having a religious experience. As the priest comes up the aisle, I quickly move to side-facing pews in the transept and kneel a long time, wooden kneeler, like penance. The Mass grows packed, people coming in late — they are sitting on the floor, on the back of the altar. Little kids, running around. Someone answers a cell phone. It is a free-for-all. I follow along, at the Our Father turning my palms up with everyone else and praying in English quietly beneath their Lithuanian. People leave before communion or stay in lines, moving quickly, flat screen TVs fixed above the outer aisles. In bed that night I will think of the Franciscan monks, their smooth skin, their movie star way of running the Mass.

In the countryside of Lithuania, farming is 50 years behind western practices, maybe a hundred years too old. Wooden wagons, old single seat tractors. Fields sparely planted, as though a hand lightly sprinkled seeds, unlike my homeland with machined furrowing and overflowing crops. No fences. Cows are tied one at a time, grazing a circle around themselves. Open fields transition to dead and dying Soviet imagery, villages organized with blocky complexes for living, working, and farming. Here and there, a watchtower.
At Šiauliai, the Hill of Crosses is a small mound overlooking the Kulpe River, a creek really weedy, shadowed by hundreds of thousands of wooden crosses and rosaries — a tribute to people killed and deported, a pilgrimage, a folk art nature installation, crosses for everything, all reasons, people fall to their knees. The Soviets razed everything but the crosses kept coming back. On the wooden altar where the Pope said Mass, I trip on a rotting plank. Sun, voices in different languages — it is a roadside attraction. Car licenses from Estonia, Latvia, Sweden.

When you would want language to say something literal, you would want to be able to say what this hill looks like. A photo maybe … I take 20 and they all look the same — spiky, weathered, gray, same shapedness, crosses and rosaries. Metaphor maybe, like stars picked out, and shaken up and compressed in an empyrean hand, then spilled on a hill in Lithuania.

It was not so long ago the Lithuanians of my family lived here, emigrating to the American Midwest and living among other Lithuanians, speaking the language, going to Mass at St. Casimer Church. Stanislovas and Agata Uselis, in the South Bottoms of Sioux City, Iowa, work up the dirt of the backyard, plant fruits and vegetables, raise chickens. Open a boarding house, a tavern. Three children. Is this a fulfillment of the dream? Is this what they expected to find? They work in dust and dirt 5,000 miles from home, among people of many languages.  Nearing retirement, they move to Omaha, Stan’s mind weakening, body giving out. They say it is hardening of the arteries, and then he is impossible to live with, running away, fighting, not making sense. Committed to Lincoln State Hospital, dies there. Agata, now Agnes, moves in with her middle child, Anne, a young widow with a son. These women remain strong, earning money, keeping their yard, fixing their house. Alone they raise the little boy who will become my father, teaching him to pray in Latin and feeding him cabbage.

Palanga, coastal resort. Black-clad Euro boys are so drunk it is frightening, their skinny legs wobbling and their feet in fancy narrow shoes, going every which way as they try to navigate sand. Old couples hold hands. People my age walk their children around, happy — this is how to vacation. I have done it myself. I have owned this kind of happiness. My husband, a hemisphere away. My love poem would name global parallels, measure our distance. Our patterns repeat. The surf freezes my feet and ankles, soaks the bottoms of my rolled-up jeans. In a hidden spot in a dune, I unroll the pants to let them dry, arrange around me a barricade of my belongings: map, shoes, notebook, and jacket. Far away, the barricade of my house, job, friends, family. I shake beach glass in my hand, picked to add to my daughter’s collection.

What am I looking for? And the next question comes like water. Am I looking for the father? Am I looking for God?  Something has known all my exteriors. The Baltic Sea, with its small persistent waves, today looks smooth as if it skims a submerged, flat surface.  The sun is searing and hurts my eyes.

At sunset, a hundred of us gather on the pier and do not look away until the red orb of sun is gone. I will walk the streets to the Café Cuba and eat a bowl of tomato soup with a coil of soft sour cream. I will eat a salad made of carrots. I will drink one glass of wine and eavesdrop on the English-speaking tourists at the next table.

In morning, as I wait for the Klaipėda bus, an elderly man, cane, overcoat, tweed hat. Speaking all the time, he lowers his 6-plus foot frame into the seat across from me and removes his hat to show thin wisps of hair combed over. When he notices my silence, I speak my memorized phrase, nekalbu lietuviškai, saying in Lithuanian I don’t speak Lithuanian. He smiles and leads me with sound so we speak of the sea, my glass of water, his snack of a peeled potato with thin sour cream like skim milk. His name is Stanislovas. When we leave the café, he accompanies me to the bus station, and I could take his arm, gentleman of Palanga. He is a man of language as old as the sea.

Grandmother, why did your parents leave Lithuania? She answers right away, turning angry eyes on me. Well, why do people come from Ireland? In a gentler tone, she adds, They were looking for a better life, and they found it. That’s all. She was stern about looking into the past.

The question never comes up between me and my father, hangs unspoken between us. I would not know how to ask, and for him, the few words he has offered of where he came from have already been said. He is a man of present day, of raising kids, of working. Don’t use words if you can avoid using them.
Photo albums and history books. I stare at pictures of family women and other Lithuanians, looking for signs of my own face. I seem to be there, especially in the bodies — the big shoulders, the chests that widen.

Always good with maps, but here the scope is confusing, time and shape seeming to contain impossible juxtaposition. Am I here already? Old Town in Vilnius. Senamiestis. Extravagantly beautiful and dense with churches, ideas, art, history — too much for me, my first large European city, my first try at touring a place this old. The medieval streets make no sense, too narrow to see beyond, their pattern all a series of curves and angles. At the tower of the Higher Castle on a hill at city center, a headache pounds my eyelids, my mind grasping at everything and nothing.

Think river. Confluence of the Vilnia and Neris. I walk to the riverside, collecting the waters, the look and the sound, as I have collected waters of many places. There is a man on the banks of the Neris, working a wire in his teeth, bending or straightening it as a fishhook. His tackle box is open at his feet, spilling out his equipment. There I am looking at the smallest possible thing, a fishing line, almost invisible, staring until it is all that I see.

In the big city, I am timid. Give me farms, fields, woods. Give me a beach town with taverns. Give me a quiet city like Klaipėda, where lights go out at midnight. But be here, be present. Bring me alive, Vilnius. I won’t be afraid.

My rented room like magic behind the solid gray wall and graffitied door, with stained glass windows, heated tile, a large space with bed, couch, and coffee table. Open a window and sit in the easement. The street below is narrow, lined with small cars. A car alarm goes. Another. The car alarm is the national anthem of Lithuania.

A voice in the distance, the voice of a crazy person, roaming the streets. I had seen him out there, grizzled and bent, shouting, “America! America!” like a deranged Walt Whitman.

The days go hour to hour and I mark them with tasks. Wake, coffee, read, buy a belt, buy a trinket for my daughter. Food, read maps. Walk. Figure out transportation. Follow myself on a map. Where now on the roadway? On the train line? Basement of the train station, I stand in line for the stinky closets with their ugly pissing holes.

Tourist train up Gediminas Hill, over Old Town’s gentle descent to the river. Soviet barracks perch on the horizon. The Vilnius TV tower needles the sky, the symbol of independence. The Singing Revolution, with people out in the streets singing folk songs and hymns. Two million holding hands across the Baltics. Under the tower, Soviet tanks rolled over unarmed Lithuanians, a dozen dead and hundreds injured. The world would finally see, a station in Kaunas broadcasting all night, the Soviet era ending, and a new life for Lithuania.

Arrests and deportations, dying or coming back home, met with suspicion. The farmers deported, the intellectuals, the poets. After Stalin, the KGB. These things I am looking at, lingering over, this space the space of those Soviet men, I am breathing their air, I am letting my mind go toward their minds, the long hallways and rooms, an easy place to hide, all the recording equipment. Listening to tapes. Red, so much red color. The Cheka. For the glory of the Cheka.  Looking at the faces of the KGB leaders, arranged on one of their walls, every size and shape, so much sameness in their unsparing expressions. Still, a smile here, a smile there. Did this smiling one act as executioner down below, in the remote killing room? Perhaps he was the one to straitjacket a priest and take him to the water torture room, to stand on a steel circle the size of a frying pan, hours above icy water. Maybe he ordered in another to the whipping cell, unspeakable horrors breathing from its padded walls. In the pissing chamber you can still smell what passed from the bodies.

The Jewish since the 14th century, and by the 20th, the art, the literature, the business and politics, the presence in Vilnius, one-third of the city, the Great Synagogue of Vilna, tens of thousands of Jews, bustling, trading, creating on a Zemaitijos street.

Nearly total annihilation. Two ghettos. Deportation to camps. The killing pits at Paneriai. Over in Kaunas, the Ninth Fort, killing Lithuanians and others from all over Europe. We are 900 Frenchmen, carved into a cell wall.

Now only a small population, the fort, the memorial plaques. In Vilnius, a map of the ghetto. Two Yiddish signs. Hard to find.

I go outside, walk the perimeter. There are low windows above the cells, the imagined person trying to see out into the light. How do we imagine the suffering of others? What voices make it possible to say what we see, to honor what has been lost? What language? I will take words into this moment, and I will tell you that Lithuania is passionate and strong. At the revolution, its anthem said,

There in the city of Vilnius
You will find three trumpets
When you sound the first
Your mother, father, will weep
When you sound the second
The city of Vilnius will rise
When you sound the third
The entire earth will tremble.

It is good to be out driving. It is good to be on a minibus and reading highway signs. Trakai Castle, pretty tourism. Crowds at the turnstile, bodies compressed. In the castle courtyard, sunlight pours like liquid inside the dark walls. The rooms with their exhibits across time, coin treasures next to a computer touch screen, the king’s goblet near photos of Lithuanians who play in the National Basketball Association.

There are days when home feels close. Internet café, exchanging ideas with my husband about our jobs, our house. Checking on the girl. What did she wear to preschool today?

Go into a record store. This clerk speaks English, he is my age, smiling so the sides of his eyes wrinkle. An hour I stand at the counter, listening in headphones to the music he brings, the alternative, the ska. I want something Lithuanian. “I have just the thing,” he says, and smiles while I smile inside the headphones, listening to an ’80s band called Antis, with syncopated rhythm and saxophones. Cool 20-somethings in the alleys of Vilnius still try to sound like Antis.

American Midwest ’70s status quo, don’t make waves, work ethic, self-reliance but you’d better watch out, don’t get above yourself. Oh Lord, I am heartily sorry for all my sins. Cold War kids — what is it we are afraid of? Protected by parents, school, and church. The world beyond our borders feels incomprehensible, is unknowable. When the Wall comes down in my early adulthood, I will hardly understand.

In the street below, Our Lady of the Gate of Dawn — people weep, say the rosary. She is world famous, full of grace, transcendent. The Poles come to see her. There are churches worldwide devoted to her. Mother of God, with hands crossed at her chest, eyes half closed, without the child, with a serenity and understanding for each of us, sinners who need prayer. She has survived wars and occupations, remaining on the chapel balcony inside the city gate, on view for all. She is a miracle.

I go up the chapel steps, kneel before the holy icon of Mary crowned with silver and gold, carved out to show the original paint of her face and hands. Go ahead and pray, but my mind sizzles into stillness. She is so beautiful, I can’t find words. Starstruck.

Užupis, neighborhood of artists. Monument to Frank Zappa. Statue of an egg hatched into a trumpeting angel. They have declared independence, have their own constitution. I eat and drink wine. I write in my little notebook, girl scout notes. This spicy lamb soup and Sangiovese.  So good. Geria.

Outside for smoke. Man with bald head, light fur of gray around the sides, ponytail in back. Small glasses with rectangular frames. He smokes with me, moves in on me, hip to hip.  Sizing me up. I don’t turn away as he speaks into my ear.

His English is slow, he is Audrius, he is a picture framer. Inside, a friend, Tomasz, the prime minister of the breakaway Republic of Užupis, carries inside his black overcoat the decrees of freedom of his people: the right to have many cats, the right of every dog to be a dog. Tomasz at 6 feet tall, with shoulder-length stringy hair turning under at his collar and cobalt blue eyes.

We talk Whitman and Brodsky, the cousins Milosz. The Beats, they are important here, Tomasz says of his neighborhood. I want to spend days here. Who are the poets of Vilnius? What are their languages? But in the cavina, it is getting late. My wedding ring. Tomasz studies it. Outside on the street we meet young musicians, and girls bounce on their toes and sing.  Tomasz and I lean, backs against brick, as we look up through the narrow lane between buildings to the moon that has just made its appearance. A gibbous. We are talking about life and death, he is speaking of his boyhood in Moscow, he is speaking of time as a continuum, saying he believes in many lives, and the one we are living now is a time among other times. What is unsaid is the suffering that makes his words true. He is a preacher, an inspirer. His hands are soft, a man of ideas.

I believe these ideas. I believe in other lives. Heaven, I believe in that. I have spoken and prayed to people in the afterlife, I see them in my dreams and I believe it is because they are alive in heaven that they can visit my dreams. I believe too that we must listen for other voices, we should be present in the darkness. The moon is a hole in the sky. Pass through the dome to the brightness of the empyrean. I believe the universe pulses with searing white light.

A Czech piano soloist plays Chopin, and he is charming, taking time with the audience, looking up and smiling. At the national philharmonic hall, I am drinking a white wine at intermission, lingering by a pillar, wishing for a companion. Then the symphony, Bohuslav Martinů. I take it in eyes closed, letting it fill me — strings, they have always affected my fingers, music of an orchestra so tactile.

All afternoon on Vokieciu Street the leaves of October detach from urban birches. They brush my arms, land on my Russian notebook like individual ideas. I press them down and trace an outline, like a small child. Like my daughter.

Lietuva, the place I am. This table beneath a gold tent saying “Utenos,” a beer of Vilnius.  This cold, creamed beetroot soup, the one spoonful of sour cream blended in not dulling its color, bright pink. I am used to Lithuanian. Euphonious. Its trilled r’s and all its vowels, I can hear each one. I can whisper the sounds and imagine speaking this beautiful language. This table, the voices, a baby crying. Gold leaves. Lithuania is a golden place.

I take my trinkets — a rosary, an icon, amber bracelets — take the small words I learned — prašau (please), geria (good), labas (hi), ačiū (thank you). Eat a large meal, drink wine and eat meat. The server is sweet — she looks just like my student Angie, big curious brown eyes. I leave a large tip, getting rid of last litas, my banquet complete.  I will go back to the room with nothing to read, my books left on a table in Vilnius for someone to find, and I will open the yellow Russian notebook and have nothing to say. I go sleepless, my leg muscles in a siege of cramps.

In morning my heart hammers in a long line for my flight, and taking off I look out into the gray start of day, my heart churning now, my mind gorged. I will sleep until Amsterdam, and going back to America watch simple American movies, eat snacks, and move out of my seat only once in eight hours, until the last connection when I transform. I am wife, mother, and teacher. Language boxes my days. I will go on the last flight into Columbus, Ohio, where husband and child wait, little girl clutching the rag doll I had given her the day I left, with her orange shoes and brown yarn hair and hat with a flower. We named her Agata.

The train had arced through the countryside. It left Klaipėda to go east toward the highlands, stopping now and again in a village, letting off and picking up. I followed on my large map, folding and refolding, checking the town names etched in the old stone of the stations.

The pine fields thicken. Coming down from Šiauliai to Ukmerge, little houses keep backs to the train tracks, their yards loaded with fruit and vegetables, vines, flowers still in bloom even now in October. When I pass the ancestral fields of my family, my great grandmother slowly rises. She is a tall woman. Stout. Her face is rounded in every way, ball cheeks, puffy nose, the eyes behind the glasses beneath a thick ridge of brow.

She is holding a large jar filled with cut flowers. She does not hold them weakly, more like a man would, with a bent elbow and grip on the jar’s rim, her other hand hanging at her side.  Her scowl means life has been hard, but she is uncomplaining. She loves flowers and colors, and she knows what it means to work. When I look away she goes to her knees and scoops soil into her hands, lifts it to her face, breathes it in.

If I were to feel gratitude, it would be falsified by a lack of understanding. If I were to feel regret, it would come from a craving based on greed. In my family, what I have been taught is the real experience of work and earth, as if always in a field or garden, putting hands into the dirt, making it better, going forward. The parts I can’t know, the grandfather’s final descent into illness and the grandmother’s longing for home, they are like stubborn rocks, erratics in the field.

Stanislovas and Agata, they visit my dreams, real as people I saw in Lithuania, floating past me and speaking an ancient language. Usalis. Usailis. You sail, I think. We sail.

 

Feeding the need

Lara Vapnyar’s Broccoli and Other Tales of Food and Love peeks into the hidden lives of everyday people.

 

The cultural universals of food and love take on subtle hues of meaning in Lara Vapnyar’s new collection of short stories Broccoli and Other Tales of Food and Love. In these half dozen tales of Eastern European immigrants comes a cornucopia of emotion, from the wry and the sad, to the hopeful and the poignant, as each character tries to find a place in this new world. Vapnyar’s immigrants’ hopes and dreams and despairs are framed through the lens of food. In these stories, immigrants become more — or sometimes less — settled as their perspective and proximity to familiar and foreign dishes change, as they settle into new lives while still at times grasping for little bits of home. Vapnyar’s book concludes with recipes annotated with a pleasant but strikingly personal voice that loosely corresponds to the collection of stories.

Lara Vapnyar, author of the novel Memoirs of a Muse and the short story collection There are Jews in My House, has created a compact and emotionally charged collection of work in which the stories are thematically very similar — a tight array focused on identity and community as experienced by immigrants to America. Four of the six stories have been previously published in magazines like Harper’s and The New Yorker; “Puffed Rice and Meatballs” was one of the O. Henry Prize stories in 2006.

In Broccoli and Other Tales of Food and Love, it’s all about assuaging loneliness — physical and emotional — and finding that salve in unexpected places and ways. Vapnyar’s characters strive to be happy with their new lives, and end up with consolations far from what they originally had in mind. For example, in “A Bunch of Broccoli on the Third Shelf,” Nina finally gets to the cook the vegetable that she so faithfully and optimistically buys every Saturday, only to let it lay forgotten in her refrigerator; however, it isn’t a dish for her husband. In “Borscht,” Sergey goes off in search of a touch of home, but finds it in the culinary rather than coital experience he expects. Luda and Milena, the eponymous pair in “Luda and Milena,” are dueling students in an English class for adults, who vie for the attention of the same man, with a result that is opposite — and catastrophic — from their original hopes and intentions.

The dominance of food as a theme is an effective entry point for the reader, as just about everyone can relate to these experiences. Broccoli and Other Tales of Food and Love swings from a familiar dish being reminiscent of home, to the discomfort of trying to order something unpronounceable from a menu, from the fluidity of a recipe passed on from family to family, to the competitive streak that can ignite between one cook and another. Vapnyar’s short stories allow for a peek into the hidden lives, the secret desires and regrets, and the expression or repression of the same, in everyday people.

 

Confessions of a female boxer

How I didn’t fight like a girl.

 

 “You’re too perty to be boxing,” the tall, chiseled, handsome, broad-shouldered white man teased. He spoke his words slowly, almost slurring them — Southern style — past my ear. From the corner of my eye, I sized up the woman he was addressing. She was around 5-foot-five, slender, and curvaceous. Her smooth chocolate skin was complemented by a thick black ponytail that rested in the dip between her shoulder blades. Her outfit was color-coordinated and probably name brand: a double-layered, two-toned pink and green sports bra visible under a sheer T-shirt, and green jogging shorts that stopped just short of her crotch.

The perty woman had expected to be seen in the gym and did not want to disappoint. Nice ass, I thought, but legs way too skinny.

Her powdery smell and nice clothes were quite a contrast to the dank atmosphere of the gym and to the rest of the amateur boxing class of 12 students. We were a motley crew in cutoff denim, faded sweats, soccer shorts, and a variety of “wife beaters.” Until that night — six months into my training — I had been the only female student in the class.

Our coach looked deeply into her eyes and then rolled his gaze over the rest of her body. She smiled and blinked her eyes quickly as she adjusted her awkward fight stance. Maintaining his intense eye contact, he stepped closer to her and moved her gloved hands farther apart. As he did so, I watched his fingertips glide slowly along one of her forearms into the bend of her elbow. There was more blinking and smiling from her, but I thought I saw her shoulders slump as he walked away. It was obviously her first day. Boxing moves feel and look unnatural for the first week or so because you have to unlearn the instinct to strike first with your strongest hand.    

The coach then moved toward me and stood directly in front of my poised, gloved fists. 
 
“Okay, let’s repeat the combination,” he instructed the class. “Jab, cross, and hook on my command.” He was checking each person’s form and speed. “Go!”

I too worked hard not to disappoint.

“Keep your elbows tight on that hook,” he told me before demonstrating. He curled his back slightly and bent his knees for balance and mobility.

“You don’t want to leave your face open when you hit, see?” His eyes peeked over his large bare knuckles for a second before his three punches shot through the air. The muscles in his neck and arm flexed through the thin T-shirt.

“Pshew! Pshew! Pshew!” He forced air through his teeth in loud whispers with each skillful punch.

“Push from the shoulders and curve at the waist. Let your body give you the force, so the arms don’t have to do all the work. Always protect yourself. Go!”

This time I felt the strength of my whole body concentrated in the motion of my arms. I pushed my fists through the nose of my invisible opponent and then finished her with my right hook to the temple. It felt good to be in such powerful control of my body.

He glanced into my eyes, nodded his head, and moved to the next student. I am not too pretty to be a boxer.

I am 5-foot-nine. My shoulders are broad and my arms toned. My dreadlocs are pulled back with a headband. My thigh muscles bear the mark of resistance training. Though I could never be mistaken for a man, I embrace my masculine edge in a way that helps me blend in with the guys in the gym. My form, my precision, my “don’t fuck with me” face as I hit the heavy bag, can be very attractive to people who know what to look for in a fighter. I see the men — other trainers, semipro competitors, as well as some in my class — smiling and leaning their heads together to whisper while they watch me move. One or two of them usually comment to me directly, saying with innuendo: “Take it easy on your (sparring) partner” or “I hope I don’t get too close to you!”

As you can probably tell, I like — even seek — their approval. This desire to be acknowledged by men is a dirty little secret my lesbian feminist sensibilities will only admit to in the context of boxing. I know that the lesbian boxer is oh-so-clichéd, but this is a relatively new passion for me. I only began this training when running became too painful. It was not because Laila Ali or Ann Wolf inspired me, or because I’ve always had a repressed wish to be in the ring. In fact, being a fighter is the opposite of my usually inhibited personality. 

However, my body — tall, broad, black, and inclined to muscularity — can be intimidating for some people, but until recently I’ve never been conscious of that. Now that I’ve been boxing for awhile, I delight in the fluid motion of my swing, the way I feel as I “stick and move” around the heavy bag. This physical confidence spills over into my daily interactions. When I am dissatisfied with customer service, for example, I complain with my arms folded or throw the most piercing look I can summon. People usually react the way I want by either leaving me the hell alone or stammering their apologies.

I never had that kind of relationship with my body as a runner.

This brings me back to the perty girl. The coach continued with his flirtatious compliments throughout the class, and she never returned. I have thought of her often since that day. It occurs to me that she should be celebrated in a sport that can also serve as self-defense because she’s the type of woman many men assume they can victimize or dominate. She should be encouraged to feel comfortable in being seen as strong, athletic, and attractive. Too often we are perceived and treated a particular way based on only one of those characteristics from our early girlhood. Pretty girls do not fight and, as we are told in so many ways, strong girls are not pretty.

Instead of flirting with her, the coach should have instructed her the way he would have any novice male student: with patience, critical feedback, and affirmation of her potential. Yeah, she was attractive. So what? His response to her made her self-conscious and affected her performance in that already very masculine environment. His attitude represents mainstream culture’s view that only certain types of women — those with big muscles, a heavy build, or an unattractive face — are acceptable outside of traditional feminine roles. When is a man ever considered too attractive for any given activity?

And what about my response? Assuming that she believed him, what should I have said or done as a witness to this crushing of her desire to learn? I should have made some witty retort to put him in check for his sexist behavior. I should have shown some female solidarity because I knew better than anyone else what it took for her to have shown up in the first place. It was weeks before I felt completely comfortable there.

But my confession is that I didn’t say anything. The truth is, I reveled in the contrast her perceived weakness created between us. Because she was perty, I was by default a natural. Actually, most of the men, even the skinny ones, hit harder than I do and have better form. This is because, biological considerations aside, boys are generally taught the basic principles of boxing throughout boyhood, in the rough-and-tumble “play fighting” that goes on between male siblings and friends or with uncles and father figures. With few exceptions, girls are taught to expect protection from those same relationships.

I must confess that I failed myself and my classmate in that moment. When we stand idly by and witness that kind of behavior without intervening, we become passive participants in the act. Women have been fighting for centuries for equal treatment and equal opportunity. So if I find myself in that situation again, I’ll have to be faster on my feet. I’ll speak up. I’ll stick and move, bob and weave, “sting like a bee.” I confess I was too busy being one of the guys when I should have been fighting like a girl.
 

 

Writer in exile

Three seasons away from freedom.

 

It was fall in Mongolia, and the dusk falling round the State Department Store, the central meeting place in the capital city of Ulaanbaatar, made it hard to see anyone’s face — not that I knew what the man I was supposed to meet looked like. I had just arrived for the year to work with writers, and my desire to see the creation of a Mongolian branch of International PEN was shared by Dugar, an Inner Mongolian writer living in New York City.

The two of us had never met. Dugar got my name from the Freedom to Write and international programs director Larry Siems at PEN in New York when Dugar called to ask about the possibility of establishing a Mongolian PEN Center. Larry happened to know I was in Mongolia, trying to make that very idea a reality. Dugar emailed me and asked me to look up an Inner Mongolian writer living in exile from China, in Ulaanbaatar: Mr. Tumen Ulzii Bayunmend. I thought the two were friends, but later I’d find out that Dugar knew of Tumen Ulzii because Tumen Ulzii was a prominent essayist — he wrote about the Chinese government’s actions toward Inner Mongolians — and a leading figure in the People’s Party of Inner Mongolia.

The man I met in front of the State Department Store didn’t look like a refugee, which goes to show how many assumptions I had. Tumen Ulzii has an open, smooth, and youthful face. We wove through the crowds of young people hanging out in front of the State Department Store, and made our way onto Peace Street and into a melee of knockoff sunglasses stands and Korean restaurants. That night at Broadway Pizza, with only the most basic Mongolian words under my belt and about ten English words under his, Tumen Ulzii and I relied almost entirely on pens, paper, an electronic dictionary, beer, and universal gestures for conversation.

Tumen Ulzii is keen and quick. He told me about himself first, then about his move to China, his wife and daughter who are still there, and the books he wrote about race and politics that brought Inner Mongolian fans in from the countryside just to meet him. These same books precipitated a ban on his writing in China and the police raids on his office and home after he left China for Mongolia in 2005. The reason so many Inner Mongolians speak out against the Chinese government — or would like to — is the long history of oppression like that suffered by Tibetans; the effort for cultural preservation, expression, and autonomy among ethnic minorities has often led to clashes with the Chinese government, and Tumen Ulzii’s story is just one of many.

Differences between Inner and Outer Mongolia

The country of Mongolia is the territory once referred to as Outer Mongolia, and the territory of Inner Mongolia lies in China. The size of the difference between Inner and Outer Mongolians depends on who you ask.

Inner Mongolians see themselves as part of a larger Mongolia, but this view is not shared by the Outer Mongolian public, and anyone from any part of China is at risk here due to a sentiment proven by the “fucking Chinese go home” graffiti outside my apartment, and the recently acquired black eye of my young Chinese friend Li, who is here to study. Ulaanbaatar is a small city, and Tumen Ulzii, audibly from a Chinese region, does not feel safe.

Language differences between the two are also apparent; Tumen Ulzii speaks differently from Outer Mongolians. Inner Mongolian dialect has a “j” sound where Outer has a “ts” sound, and the pronouns are a bit different. Inner Mongolians still use the traditional Mongolian vertical script for everything from school notes to street signs. Tumen Ulzii, also fluent in Japanese and Chinese, is confounded by the Cyrillic type used here in (Outer) Mongolia. My Mongolian teacher, Tuya, is the only younger Mongolian I’ve met who knows traditional Mongolian script well. Though the Cyrillic type was instituted here in (Outer) Mongolia only in 1944, it has taken deep hold. The pages of Tumen’s notebook, however, are covered in the rows of lacy black script whose vertical nature, Mongolians say, makes you nod yes to the world as you read instead of shaking your head no.

Refugee situations are not easy

On a much colder and clearer day in January, Tumen Ulzii and I walked the five minutes from my apartment to the Mongolian branch of the United Nations (U.N.). Uniformed men in their early 20s guarded the compound. Even without my passport — I had left it on my dresser to remind myself to get more pages at the American embassy — they let me in. Tumen Ulzii and I crossed an eerily quiet parking lot filled with white vans to a pink, Soviet-style building, where the receptionist asked about my lack of documentation. We walked into the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) office, whose walls were home to UNICEF posters and the air smelled of coffee, and I asked one large Mongolian man, Mr. Och, what the holdup was on Tumen Ulzii’s refugee status.

Refugee situations are never easy, and this was no exception. Mongolia does not have an official UNHCR branch, only a liaison office, so the decision to grant Tumen Ulzii refugee status had to come from the nearest branch, which happened to be in … Beijing. Mongolia also has no provisions for asylum seekers in its law, so as long as Tumen Ulzii remained one, he was at risk of deportation and then punishment at the hands of the very government who had its police officers storm his house and strip-search his wife.

Tumen Ulzii has not been the only one. His friend Soyolt, another Inner Mongolian dissident, was arrested on January 7, 2008, upon touchdown in Beijing on a business trip. Soyolt was in the impenetrable world of arbitrary detention without charge or trial somewhere in China for the next six months while his wife and three children remained powerless here in Ulaanbaatar. He was allowed one phone call back in January, and he reported that Chinese officials had told him that if he made a fuss or alerted any foreign media, things would get worse.

The imminent Olympic Games in Beijing seems to be both a blessing and a curse for Chinese dissidents: Attempts by the Chinese government to silence them during the buildup to the Olympics has increased, but for the lucky dissidents who get noticed by the international community — a community currently paying extra-close attention to China and its human rights record — the imminence of the Olympic Games can help their cause.

Mr. Och at UNHCR told me to secure a letter of support for Tumen Ulzii from Freedom to Write at PEN in New York, and that a decision should come in the next week — something he would tell me for three months. Afterward, Tumen Ulzii and I went to get a beer. Tumen loves that I like beer. It was midafternoon, but around here people drink beer at lunch — at least the demographic I work with (read: middle-aged male writers).

Bayarlalaa, minii okhin,” he says. Thank you, my daughter. “Sain okhin,” he says. Good girl.

Visiting with friends and family

Tumen Ulzii is extremely intelligent, but there are some things he says that boggle me. He can understand lesbianism, but not male homosexuality, and he wants to know why it exists, and how the sex happens. He thinks Hitler’s fine, since he wasn’t as bad as Stalin. He likes President Bush, purely because Bush is the president of the United States.

He does have a few good friends here. Uchida is a gentle Japanese man and a great friend of Tumen Ulzii’s. I met with both men several times at the pub around the corner from where I live. Uchida, who studied in Inner Mongolia, showed me cell phone pictures of his four-month-old baby — the baby and her mother live in Japan. When I wrote up a bio of Tumen Ulzii to forward to PEN’s Freedom to Write program, the men checked it over, with Uchida translating, while I dug into fried meat and rice. Though they are both in their 40s, they looked and sounded like school buddies hunched over a cheat sheet, casual and affectionate. Afterward, I told them I needed to go and clean my floor. They told me they would like me to stay and drink beer with them instead.

“Do tomorrow,” Uchida said.

“What do tomorrow?” I asked, and at the same time, one man mopped with an invisible mop and the other swept with an invisible broom.

Tumen Ulzii had Tuya and me over for a real Inner Mongolian dinner at his modest and bare but immaculately clean apartment, which was on the worst side of town, near the black market. To begin, he gave me a bowl of milky tea with some kind of grain cereal at the bottom. This was suutetsai, a dish nomadic Mongolians have at every meal, which consists of green tea, milk, and salt. He then surprised me by thumbing off pieces of meat from the boiled sheep leg on the table and dropping them one by one into the bowl, something he kept doing throughout the meal. It wasn’t half bad, once I expanded my mindset to one that included garnishing something like crunchy Cream of Wheat with mutton.

The second time I visited Tumen Ulzii at his home, I came by myself during the February holiday of tsagaan sar (“white moon” or “white month”). He had invited me weeks beforehand to be present on the first day of his wife and daughter’s 10-day visit. He and his daughter Ona, a delicate university student speaking very good English, picked me up in a taxi (which in Ulaanbaatar is usually a beat-up stick-shift car driven by a regular guy who could use a thousand or two tugriks). We stopped for groceries; he wanted to get beer for me and he wanted Ona to have one too, like me, something which she does not usually drink and which I tried to stop drinking.

On the way up the stairs, Tumen Ulzii took us one floor too far, then couldn’t figure out why his key didn’t work, and Ona gave him grief for it in universally understandable tones. That night Tumen Ulzii came alive, bickering with Ona, their voices singing in Mongolian and Chinese across the kitchen. Tumen Ulzii is immensely proud of his daughter; she tested into the top 10 percent of university students in China. I took videos of them singing traditional Inner Mongolian songs and smiled at his wife, a quiet geography teacher a few years older than Tumen Ulzii. I felt guilty for knowing what was done to her at the border the last time she visited her husband, trying not to imagine it now that I had seen her tired face.


An official refugee, at last

Spring 2008 … not spring by the standards of my home in California — it snowed last week — but sunny enough for sunglasses as I waited for Tumen Ulzii in front of the State Department Store. He approached in a long black coat and shades that made him look like a spy in a big-budget movie. He smelled my cheeks, the customary Mongolian greeting, and as we walked away from the throngs, he said, “Min! United Nations, okay!” and put his thumb up. I whooped and called Och, who confirmed the news. Tumen Ulzii had become an official refugee, eligible for resettlement. The letter Larry Siems at PEN Freedom to Write in New York sent expressing concern about Tumen Ulzii had been crucial to the decision.

To celebrate, Tumen Ulzii took me to a Korean restaurant. He laid several strips of fatty meat (Mongolian meat always comes this way) on the griddle set up at our table. My Mongolian was better than it was six months ago when we first met, but we still did a fair amount of the gesturing. He raised his beer, pronouncing me an Inner Mongolian daughter.

Resettlement, yes. But where?

Uchida comes and goes from Japan every couple of months, always with new pictures of his child to show Tumen Ulzii. Their friendship thrives despite distance, so when Tumen Ulzii resettles, there is no doubt they’ll remain in touch. Meanwhile, Tumen Ulzii’s keen to know which presidential candidates are leading in my country, and overjoyed that Obama is dark-skinned. He now wonders where I think the best place to resettle would be. America? He mimes an injection into his arm, then, reading from a book, puts his arm high into the air: “Hospitals and university fees are high in America.”

Resettlement can be a long and difficult process. Canada or Europe, we hope. He is very concerned that Ona go to a good university. He loves dogs, but can’t have one here — somewhere he can have a dog. Tumen Ulzii insists that when I visit Hohhot next month I stay with his wife.

Sain okhin,” he says, kissing the top of my head. Good girl.

 

 

 

Will Harlem lose its soul?

The death of an eatery.

 

Like most other Harlem eateries, Manna’s Eighth Avenue location presents little to look at: it’s a standard two-floor affair, with the food on the first level and seating upstairs. The restaurant occupies the southernmost end of a low-rise building between 125th and 126th Streets: a red-brick edifice running almost the entire length of the block’s western edge and comprising several other establishments, all local businesses.

Just inside the entrance hangs an ornate crystal chandelier, a furnishing somewhat at odds with Manna’s predominantly utilitarian aesthetic. Once entering, patrons immediately pick up their Styrofoam clamshell carton and browse the steaming trays on the pair of glass-sheltered buffets.

Representing a broad cross section of the traditional Afro-American palate, the cuisine here includes Collard Greens Seasoned w/ Turkey Meat, Creamy Rich Baked Macaroni & Cheese, Corn & Okra ‘n’ Tomato Sauce, Manna’s Specialty B.B.Que Spare Ribs, Lima Beans Seasoned w/Ham Hocks, Honey B.B.Que Chicken Wings, Manna’s Homemade Peach Cobbler w/Homemade Crust, Southern Style Fried Chicken, Sweet Plantains, Crab Cakes, and Jamaican Style Rice & Beans, among other entrees.

Having made their selections, customers carry their food to the long stainless steel checkout counter, where Assistant Manager Philip Bulgar weighs and rings up their meal at the rate of $5.49 a pound, typically exchanging a few casual remarks in the process. Then they head upstairs, passing the two awards displayed proudly on the wall above the landing: the twin distinctions of “Best Soul Food Buffet” according to the New York Press’s Best of Manhattan 2004, and The Village Voice’s “Voted Superior Soul Food” from the paper’s Best of NYC 2001.

The dining area above extends into the second floor of the four-story building next door (a forlorn-looking structure with the metal skeleton of an awning wrapped around its southeast corner and gates closed over its storefronts like aluminum eyelids). Its large plate glass windows overlook the bustling activity of Harlem’s central commercial corridor: shoppers and street vendors, locals and tourists, all walking, talking, pushing, shouting, and pressing on toward their respective destinations, and then the interminable flow of traffic along the street itself. In the early months of the year, the decor here consists mostly of an abundance of indoor plant life — including a few lingering holiday poinsettias — as well as renderings of civil rights leaders and framed photographs of owner Betty Park flanking notable personalities, many of them hanging at an angle. Aside from the most recently vacated tables, the place is exceptionally clean and well maintained.

The customers fit no one description: Manna’s serves a multicultural clientele, spanning races, classes, and occupations, from middle-aged white businessmen to Latino teenagers, to African American families and Asian American solicitors.

 

Fighting change

Last summer, Betty Park and the other leaseholders learned that Kimco Realty had purchased their building and intended to demolish it. The deal was brokered by Harlem native Eugene Giscombe, of the real estate company Giscombe-Henderson, and a board member of Harlem’s Business Improvement District, a taxpayer-supported organization designed to bring jobs into the neighborhood. When asked about the development, Giscombe declined to comment.

Several businesses left the premises immediately, including Bobby’s Happy House next door, among the first African American–owned businesses in Harlem. But Manna’s and its remaining neighbors (the House of Seafood, Victor Body Lawson Architects, the Million Nail Salon, and Rotiplus Caribbean Cuisine) coalesced into the Save Harlem Association. Together they hired Adam Leitman Bailey, a prominent Manhattan real estate attorney, hoping to obtain an injunction against Kimco and prevent their eviction.

“My opinion is that Kimco does not respect how long we have been here,” says Park. “We want to take them to court.”

Park, a New Jersey resident and emigrant from Korea, opened Manna’s on the heels of the 1984 riots, which were directed against Korean merchants operating in the area. Although a self-described “new kid on the block” at the time, Park says she recognized that in order for a Korean American–owned business to gain acceptance in Harlem, it had to both appeal to and hire people from the community. One African American employee born in the South — who left Manna’s in the early ’90s — showed her how to make the “soul food” for which Park’s restaurant became known. In need of more space, Manna’s moved to its current Eighth Avenue address from its original spot around the corner. Two more Manna’s opened in Harlem: one in 1990 and the other six years later, both on the south side of 125th Street, to the east of Lenox Avenue and at the corner of Madison respectively.

According to Bailey, Kimco’s representatives claimed in an early settlement meeting that they planned to build a four-story community center on the location. However, on November 15, 2007, Kimco ran an ad in The New York Amsterdam News for a much larger retail center called “Harlem Plaza” to be built on the site. He also states that his clients were collectively offered $100,000 to leave by January — an offer Kimco has since retracted.

“They are liars and they keep on lying,” says Bailey, a brash-voiced and energetic gentleman.

Fred Winters, a spokesman for Kimco, asserts that the real estate company has intended from the outset to construct a large retail building on the site with office space available on its upper levels, some of which would be allocated for community use. He calls the $100,000 figure “grossly understated,” insisting that Kimco’s actual offer was far greater. It was withdrawn, he says, because the business owners brought suit against Kimco. Winters promises that the Harlem Plaza will bring innumerable economic advantages to the area, providing employment both in its construction and in the new businesses it will attract to the neighborhood.

“The [existing] building is old, and Kimco wants to build a building that is new and modern,” Winters says.

Bailey argues that Kimco’s project will have a devastating effect on the neighborhood’s character, saying further that the development will take years to complete, reducing the 125th Street and Eighth Avenue hub to a “parking lot.” His legal case rests on the fact that the Save Harlem Association’s members signed their leases with the building’s previous owner with the understanding that they would not be evicted and the building demolished, granting them legal protection from Kimco’s plans for the spot. In addition, the lease included a provision waiving the right to judicial review, which Bailey believes should render it void under New York State law.

Bailey’s law firm has drafted a piece of legislation that would declare all of 125th Street — also called Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard — a historic district, preventing any further development along the thoroughfare. Bailey views his work in the area as an extension of the civil rights activism based out of Harlem in the 1960s, and of the prototypical American enthusiasm for “underdogs.”

Winters, who lives only five blocks from the Plaza’s prospective address, considers the possibility of damage to Harlem’s authenticity “a very complex debate” that he prefers not to comment on.

Harlem locals say…

The accelerated gentrification of Harlem over the past decade has left many natives feeling pinched between rising rents and changes to the neighborhood’s appearance and demographics that have come with the upswing in apartment building construction. Added to that in the past year have been Columbia University’s city-approved plan to convert a 17-acre tract of Harlem’s Manhattanville area into campus buildings — while demolishing most of the existing structures, including 132 apartments — as well the rezoning of 125th street to permit further high-rise and residential development.

Assistant Manager Philip Bulgar, who has worked at Manna’s now-imperiled address since 1996, recalls first hearing about Kimco’s purchase last March. He is clearly angry, and is voluble in expressing his indignation.

“This store has been here since 1991,” Bulgar says, referring to the restaurant’s current location. “It has been one of the cornerstones of the community for a long time. We service the community and we give jobs to people in the community.”

He points to Manna’s diverse staff, a group of 20 individuals drawn entirely from the neighborhood, and that includes among its number immigrants from Africa and Mexico. Bulgar believes that new retail developments, like Harlem Plaza, will neither hire nor cater to locals. Moreover, he sees it as part of the wide-scale gentrification of the area, which he calls “ugly” and “immoral.”

“I was here in the ’90s, when Harlem was bad,” says Bulgar, recalling the neighborhood’s past problems with drugs, gangs, and petty crime. “You couldn’t give away a building in Harlem in those days. But today, Harlem is safer and cleaner than ever before.” He points out that last year, Harlem’s 28th Precinct won an award for its safety, but asks “at what cost?”

Nonetheless, Bulgar admits he prefers Harlem’s present situation to its previous one. And while he concedes that upscale development will make the neighborhood “look nicer,” he argues that “it will be artificial, very artificial.”

“A lot of businesses are going to be gone and a lot of people will lose their jobs,” Bulgar asserts. “These small businesses reflect people’s dreams and lives. And I guarantee that people will miss this.

“This is not some corporate store,” he continues, characterizing Manna’s approach to business as “people-oriented and hands-on.” Bulgar mentions a nearby Disney Store that went out of business “without anybody noticing.”

Operating the register, Bulgar — a Harlem native who lives just blocks away from his place of employment and whose daughter attends nearby City College of New York — appears comfortable and familiar with nearly all of Manna’s customers, addressing most of them like old friends. One patron invites Bulgar to his new Washington Heights apartment, which he selected for its high ceilings and its location in a vintage building. The two men spend a few moments discussing the superior merits of pre-World War II architecture.

Other customers have their own comments about the changes in their neighborhood.

“Columbia’s taking over,” one woman complains, referring the university’s increasing incursions into West Harlem. “I’m ashamed that I work for them.”

“It’s not your fault,” Bulgar assures her. “You’re not the one who makes the policy.”

“You know that in 25 years, Harlem’s going to be mostly white,” another customer, a light-skinned African American man, declares. “Seventy-five percent white and just 25 percent black.”

Noting the current rate of gentrification to the neighborhood, Bulgar estimates the interval will be closer to five years.

“Look at this,” Bulgar exclaims, gesturing out the window toward a new Soho North building on 123rd Street. “None of this was here a year ago — these condos and everything. It’s happening faster than people even realize.” He laments what he sees as obliviousness and indifference on the part of many Harlemites.

“Most of the people here are unaware of what’s going on, unaware or apathetic. They think, you know, ‘what can you do?’”

Condominiums like the one noted by Bulgar are sprouting up all over south Harlem — or as it has come to be known in real estate circles, SoHa. And with the new zoning laws, the trend is only going to continue. Proponents of the rezoning include the owners of the Apollo Theater and Congressman Charles Rangel, himself a frequent Manna’s customer. They assert that the construction of new buildings and the importation of chain stores will further rejuvenate the neighborhood.

Manager David Taylor has a different idea of why Harlem politicians are supporting City Hall’s plans.

“We live in a community where our leaders can be bought,” Taylor says. “Our leaders don’t work for us.”   

“What they’re saying is that the Harlem of old has no future,” Bulgar remarks. “A lot of these properties, the condominiums, they are going to cost half a million dollars. Now, the median income in Harlem is $27,000 a year. Who’s going to live here?”

Postlude

In the unisex bathroom on the upper level, a number of visitors to the Eighth Avenue Manna’s have written their thoughts on the wall.

“Harlem is state of mind and spirit. If you work hard enough and with the right spirit you can get Harlem back.”

“HARLEM IS OUR Promised LAND. Think about it!!”

“Black people in Harlem could have owned Harlem but they gave it away!! Now think About that!!”

Written in reply: “No one owns the earth.”

And as commentary on its predecessor: “he who has might has Right.”

And a final quip, punctuated with a smiley face: “Lease :)”

On June 11, 2008, Kimco Realty settled with the Save Harlem Association for an undisclosed sum. According to the agreement, the tenants must vacate the building by September 30 of this year. Most have left already. Manna’s continues to operate out of the 125th and Eighth Avenue location, and will relocate one block northward — to 126th and Eighth Avenue — sometime this winter.

 

A fugitive by any other name …

The relationship between identity and responsibility is explored in Janis Hallowell’s She Was.

 

Reconciling the chasm between identity and action in the context of the Vietnam War and the Iraq War is the tight focus of Janis Hallowell’s new book She Was.

Thirty-five years ago, Lucy Johansson was a Kansas-raised young adult living in California. She believed the war in Vietnam was wrong and actively pursued nonviolent protest with fellow students. When the group decided to take its resistance a step further and target buildings after hours, Lucy joined an effort to detonate an explosion at New York City’s Columbia University. Despite her diligence in making sure no one would be harmed by the bomb, there was someone in the building after hours, and Lucy’s offense suddenly bloomed into murder charges.

Fearful and alone, Lucy decided to go underground along with her Vietnam vet brother, who provided food, shelter, and support, thereby sealing his own fate irretrievably with hers. They each took up new identities and new lives. Lucy became “Doreen,” attended dental school, married, and had a child.

But now Doreen’s days on the run are numbered. A fellow student radical has set her sights on her, hoping to trade what she knows about Doreen — one of the last ’70s student radicals still in hiding — to mitigate her own husband’s jail sentence. As the FBI closes in over the course of a week, Doreen realizes her days as a suburban wife, mother, professional, and community volunteer may be over. It’s time to tell her husband and son the truth about who she was.

Woven within Hallowell’s book are several critical subplots, each of which adds to the prism through which the reader is invited to view Doreen.

Her beloved brother Adam, who gave up everything in support of his on-the-lam sister, is haunted by his own memories of service in Vietnam and his life thereafter: from atrocities to lost friends and his father’s high expectations on “being a man,” to enduring the first wave of the AIDS crisis, only to be felled by multiple sclerosis (MS) years later.

Doreen’s family — husband Miles and son Ian — know nothing of her activities in the 1970s and her fugitive status, and find it difficult to judge her for things she did before she was part of their lives. Brief appearances by a couple of Doreen’s fellow radicals illuminate some of the influences that had been at work in persuading Lucy’s involvement with the group. Doreen’s mother, who’s never forgiven her daughter for causing her to lose a son, makes her own judgments crystal clear regarding her daughter and what she’s done.

These perspectives are helpful in developing Doreen as a fully realized character while continuing to allow the reader to draw his or her own conclusions on what Doreen would like to believe about her being a fugitive from the law: that more than three decades of good citizenship somehow mitigates her role in the death of one person at the hands of another.

To her credit, Hallowell’s examination of the roots of identity teases out numerous questions. While she reveals Doreen’s perspective on the idea of identity — that is, will she always be Lucy Johansson, judged by what she did 30 years ago, or can she be Doreen Woods, responsible wife, mother, and upstanding member of her community — at the conclusion of the novel, readers are, for the most part, left to determine for themselves the nature and solidity of an individual’s identity. Through the lens of each character surrounding Doreen, Hallowell weighs whether identity is what is conferred upon a person by others or created by what one becomes through one’s actions, and whether identity is static or fluid over the courses of time and action.

Drawing strong parallels between the 1970s and today, Hallowell juxtaposes Doreen’s antiwar bombing at Columbia with her son Ian’s participation at an antiwar rally protesting American intervention in Iraq. Young Ian, headed off to college, contrasts sharply with his uncle Adam, who more than 30 years earlier felt a heavy civic burden to enlist with the Marines. Likewise, the contrast is vivid between Doreen’s two old friends — one who still clings to her college ideals, while the other wholeheartedly lives what the group used to call the “bourgeois life.”

Hallowell deftly sets up one deeply flawed character against an ever-changing backdrop of American history, and through it, prods the reader to examine the ephemeral ideas of identity and responsibility.

 

Streethaiku

Street Haiku thumbnailSeeking the zen of the present moment.

[ Click here to view the image essay ]

 

An Xiao grounds her street photography in the aesthetics of haiku and Henri Cartier-Bresson, as she seeks the Zen of the present moment in the hustle and bustle of busy city streets. She refined her tastes for city imagery while living in New York, Los Angeles and Manila.

Her award-winning work has appeared with publications and galleries internationally and throughout the New York City area, including the dual-continent Circular Exhibition with Hun Gallery and Gallery Ho in Seoul, the Asian Contemporary Art Fair with Tenri Gallery, and the Brooklyn Museum. More information about An Xiao can be found at www.anxiaophotography.com.

 

The Coney Island of Gregory Kiss’ mind

An architect’s futuristic dream of solar power realized.

 

On the roof of Gregory & Paul’s hotdog and beer stand is a statue of a paunchy man giving the thumbs-up. He’s holding a hamburger so faded one suspects it was fresh off the grill 30 years ago. The man is covered in graffiti, and so is the old-fashioned rocket ship with which he shares the roof. Back in the day, it would not have looked out of place in a Flash Gordon serial; today its blue and red paint has faded, and its white spots are splattered with yellow rust.

The sign on the top of the beer stand says “Astroland Park,” a reminder of a time when Coney Island was somebody’s idea of the future. Though the area has currently lost its former space-age shimmer to time’s onward march, it still inspires futuristic thinking — and not just the thinking that has it slated for massive commercial renovation in the coming months.

Day-trippers and beach-lovers have been visiting Coney Island for centuries, and in 1864, the West End Terminal, the area’s first train station, opened. But at the beginning of the 20th century, as Brooklyn grew in popularity, the New York City authorities and the Brooklyn Rapid Transit Company had the West End Terminal demolished and rebuilt with the most innovative, flexible transportation technology available, including a then unheard-of eight tracks and four platforms.

The new station, named the Stillwell Avenue Terminal, opened on May 29, 1919. Shortly afterward, Surf Avenue’s bustling boardwalks and amusement parks, like Steeplechase Park and Luna Park, made Coney Island one of the most popular vacation spots in all of New York; at the height of its popularity, the area had more than a million visitors a day.

Over time, Stillwell has grown into the largest above-ground terminal in New York City and one of the largest in the world. And since its 2005 renovation and reopening, it has become the first and biggest solar-powered terminal in the world, says Gregory Kiss of Kiss + Cathcart, Architects, the architectural firm that helped plan the reconstruction.

Kiss, a skinny man with a calm, professor-like demeanor, walks along the bridge that links all four platforms, pointing with pride to the panels above him. Kiss and his company worked with the New York Transit Authority to design and build the 80,000-square foot terminal shed that covers the platforms like a stadium dome.

In many ways, the Stillwell Terminal feels like the first attraction that subway users see upon arriving at Coney Island. The platforms are constructed with faded periwinkle- and white-colored steel, and are markedly free of the grime and graffiti coded into the DNA of the New York subway experience. Yet the disembarking teenagers and nuclear families rarely pause to look upward at the roof’s phalanx of panels, as such gawking is for tourists, and there are beaches, myriad forms of deep-fried batter, and the Cyclone to attend to.

If they did look up, they would see a ceiling composed of 2,730 five-by-five panels, which are two layered sheets of industrial glass that have sandwiched between them two squares and two rectangles of semitransparent photovoltaic glass. The intersecting lines between these sheets form crosses of light when looked at from below. 

Photovoltaic glass is a type of solar cell that captures the energy of the sun and converts it into direct current electricity. Kiss estimates that there is more than 50,000 square feet of it in the shed. “In most ways, they really are the best source of energy, period, because they are solid state with no moving parts, no emissions of any kind, and they produce the most energy when you need it the most — typically, in the middle of the day,” Kiss says. “This is the biggest project in the world that uses this kind of technology, integrated into a building structure.”

The shed’s solar panels represent the successful union of architectural design and fuel efficiency. They are also very, very shiny. The silvery glow of solar cells make the terminal feel like something more akin to Disney World’s Epcot and Tomorrowland amusement parks than the nostalgic charms of Coney Island. When viewed up close, a vantage point made possible by the nearby Wonder Wheel Ferris ride, the ceiling resembles a mirrored disco ball that has been unraveled and fashioned into an airplane hanger. Taken in as a whole from 150 feet in the air, the terminal and the rest of Coney Island’s attractions seem symbiotically out of time: Astroland Park and the rest of Coney’s attractions a living postcard from half a century gone by, and the terminal shed an image that arrived a few years ahead of everyone else’s schedule.

Construction time again

Last year, the New York state government announced the “15X15” plan to reduce electric energy usage in New York by 15 percent by the year 2015. The plan seeks to address the rising cost of energy by reducing the state’s reliance on fossil fuel–burning power plants. The “15” initiative calls for an increased investment in clean power options and greater energy efficiency, two areas Kiss understands well.

Kiss, 49, was born in Toronto but grew up in New Jersey around Princeton. He received his bachelor’s from Yale and his Master of Architecture from Columbia University. In addition to authoring technical manuals for the Department of Energy, his lectures on advances in solar technology and how they can be used with architectural design have taken him across the globe, and his projects have been developed everywhere from Panama to Native American reservations.

He moved to New York to study architecture in 1981, and in 1983 his newborn firm had its first commission: to design a solar panel manufacturing factory. Ever since, he’s had an interest in integrating solar technology and efficient energy practices into architectural design.    

His firm has constructed a number of environmentally forward-thinking projects in the city, including the sun-fueled, self-sustaining Solar One community education center by the East River. The center, which resembles a suburban home outfitted with a downward-facing, panel-lined roof, teaches energy conservation techniques to New York students and residents, and also hosts dance and film events.

In 1998, Kiss and his company were hired by the New York Transit Authority to help revitalize the dilapidated Coney Island Terminal. Though the area was synonymous with the Roaring ’20s, after World War II it struggled to remain relevant. The area faced competition from Jones Beach, as well as the rising popularity of then-burgeoning entertainment options like television and air-conditioned movie theaters. In 1946, the popular Luna Park closed after being ravaged by fire, and Steeplechase Park closed in 1964 following a series of accidents and the rise of crime in the area. By the 1970s, the area had become so deeply synonymous with drug- and gang-related crime, much of it linked to notorious low-income housing projects like Surfside Garden, that commercial developers were wary about investing in the area. By the 1990s, the once mighty Coney Island shrank to just four blocks of roller coasters and shows, with The New York Times reporting more than 50 unoccupied lots in the area.

Kiss remembers visiting Coney Island when he first moved to New York in the early ’80s. Back then there were hypodermic needles in the sea and fear in the air. And it only got worse as years of saltwater-infused air, as well as citywide neglect, accelerated the rust and decay of the platform’s metal.

Physically, the terminal was close to collapsing. “It was pretty scary. The steel columns down below these tracks and in many other places were corroded away to almost nothing, so there was some degree of danger there. It had to be replaced,” Kiss says. “This was an expensive project, not the sort of thing you do lightly, but as a matter of safety, it had to be done.”

Kiss + Cathcart was hired to create a new ceiling. The terminal once had individual roofs over each platform, but the Transit Authority wanted a giant roof that covered all of them. It had to be aesthetically pleasing, it had to be durable, and it had to be low-maintenance and easily fixable. Also, it would be nice if the structure could multitask.

“They thought, ‘well, this station has been here for almost a hundred years, and it will hopefully be here for another century or more.’ They have very long planning periods,” Kiss says, “and they figure that it might as well be generating electricity as it’s sheltering the station.”

Kiss and his team worked with the Transit Authority to integrate the energy-saving photovoltaic glass into the structure, and designed it with a state-of-the-art, silver and glass retro-futuristic look that would blend in well when subway passengers viewed the terminal on the same horizon as Coney Island institutions like the Wonder Wheel and the Cyclone. The firm took care to use recycled steel and aluminum, and Kiss even designed the roof to have wires that delivered a mild shock to keep birds from nesting on it.

Although they came to Kiss wanting a forward-thinking structure, the Transit Authority still had to be convinced that the project could actually work. “[We had to] show them why this makes sense and why this is not a finicky, scary, fragile technology, and why it is very reliable, and how it can be done in a way that if something does go wrong, it can be fixed.

“One of the most satisfying things to me was really the process of dealing with this very large organization that, for very good reasons, tends to be very conservative, and working through the process of educating them and understanding their needs,” he says. “It affected the design a lot; we did a lot of work and made a lot of changes to make this a very user-friendly, maintainable facility and so on.”

Power, houses

The total rebuilding of the terminal cost $250 million, some of which is returned in the form of energy savings.

The sunlight collected by the photovoltaic glass is fed into a conversion device that creates alternative current electrical energy, which is then fed into the grid for the entire station, including the main office, police stations, and underground lights. None of the collected energy is used to fuel the actual subway trains, as Kiss says that utility companies are very strict about how much power can leave an installation, and the Transit Authority prefers to sidestep the issue by keeping the energy within the local grid. “The power that is generated is used within the system,” he says.

“Another way to look at it — this project is unusual and it’s hard to get your head around it — this station produces enough electricity to provide all of the electricity for about 33 average single-family houses in this part of the country,” he says. “Total, per year. It’s a significant amount of energy.”
                       
Green days

Because of the difficulty of efficiently transporting electricity into the city from outside the city, 80 percent of the energy for New York City is generated by fossil fuel–burning power plants within city limits. These power plants contribute to unwanted citywide pollution, so Kiss thinks it’s only a matter of time before every city-owned structure that has sunlight falling on it will be outfitted with solar cells.

“The sun is giving off about probably 850 watts per square meter of energy, and it’s basically going to waste right now,” he says. “All it’s doing is heating up the sidewalk.
 
“In fact, it’s worse than that, because in most cases city buildings with a black roof, the sun is heating up the roof, heating up the building, and we are cranking up the air conditioner to counteract that. So we’re wasting all that energy, and there is an enormous capacity to harvest and use this energy in a very positive way in the city.”

There are several ways of getting power from the sun: Solar thermal power stations use sunlight and mirrors to heat up a liquid that drives an electric generator. But photovoltaic cells are the most popular form. Though solar panels have existed since the 1800s, the first solar cell was patented in 1946 by semiconductor researcher Russell Ohl. The company for which Ohl worked, Bell Laboratories, discovered that certain forms of silicon were markedly sensitive to light. The company was the first to create a device to harness energy from the sun; it had an efficiency of around 6 percent. Driven both by America’s space exploration efforts and the gas crisis of the 1970s, the technology continued to slowly grow in efficiency, popularity, and affordability, but has yet to achieve widespread household acceptance.

Even today, many think that solar panel technology, especially photovoltaic glass, is too exotic, too expensive, and not ready for mass use. Kiss wants to prove that cutting-edge technology and innovative design can fit into a reasonable budget.

“There is this sense among a lot of people, even environmentalists, that ‘yeah, solar is great, it’s expensive, but we shouldn’t even worry about the cost, we should do it anyway,’” he says. “I find that kind of an unfortunate attitude. By doing things like [Stillwell], you can make the technology much more economical than it would otherwise be. It is a struggle, but that’s not a reason not to do it.

“You don’t see more of this because of a lot of different reasons, none of which is a very serious issue in and of itself,” he says. “Technically, obviously it can be done. It can be made quite economical. There are regulatory issues, building code [issues], but those things can all be overcome.”

Whether out of concern for the environment or the bottom line, there is no doubt that the construction industry is showing an increased awareness of environmentally responsible building principles. In 2006, the Chicago-based Mintel International Group Ltd. estimated the green marketplace to be worth more than $200 billion. Chief executive officers (CEOs) are paying attention. According to a recent study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers, 61 percent of executives who responded said it was important that their companies take steps to reduce their environmental impact.

One organization helping companies do that is the U.S. Green Building Council, a nonprofit environmental organization that works with businesses to promote energy efficiency. Spokesperson Ashley Katz says that 39 percent of total energy consumption and 39 percent of harmful carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions come from buildings in metropolitan areas. The council helps companies reduce their energy use by showing them how to rely on windows instead of indoor lighting and how to install energy-saving air-conditioning units, among other techniques.
 
“I attribute it to a lot more awareness of climate change and global warming, whether it be Al Gore’s documentary [An Inconvenient Truth] or people learning more about the issue,” Katz says, “but I think right now this is a big time to be green, and people are really seeing that they need to step up to the plate in order to make a difference and turn back the clock on global warming.”

Show and prove

Kiss’ design has already saved the Coney Island Terminal both financially and in terms of CO2 emissions. And while architectural design that integrates photovoltaic technology could potentially help reduce electricity costs and harmful emissions across the country, Dr. Edward Kern of Irradiance, Inc. cautions that solar panel–integrated design is far from a quick fix for all of America’s power and pollution issues.

Kern has been working on the development and deployment of photovoltaic systems for close to three decades. A past president of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England, Kern and his company help to create commercial photovoltaic installations, and designed and executed many aspects of the Stillwell Terminal design.

Kern points to “incredible year-over-year growth” of 40 percent for companies that make solar cells as proof of the technology’s increasing acceptance. But he warns that it is best to take the development with measured enthusiasm, as the technology can reduce carbon emissions, but will not be able to completely replace the current means of producing electricity.

“It’s definitely a step in the right direction. The more solar you do, the better,” he says. “But it’s not something that’s going to end coal tomorrow and save the world.”   

Kern points to the technology’s limitations, one of which is the finite amount of energy that panels can provide relative to an area’s electricity needs.

“If you look at the electricity consumed per square mile and the amount of sunlight falling on that square mile, for New York, that ratio … is a very large number compared to rural areas,” says Kern, adding that even if it were theoretically possible to put solar panels on every square mile of the city, “solar alone for New York isn’t going to do it. You’re going to have to bring in energy from the surrounding land.”

In addition to concerns about how much energy can be generated, Kern also believes that the other main obstacle to solar technology catching on in American cities is its cost-effectiveness. While solar cells cost about $4 a watt, coal, which he says is still the most commonly used fossil fuel, only costs “about $1 or $2” a watt. A power source’s dollars-per-watt ratio is determined by dividing the cost of the source by its rated energy output. For example, Kiss says that a panel that produces 200 watts and sells for $600 has a ratio of $3 a watt.

When solar panels first became commercialized in the 1950s, the cost was usually thousands of dollars for one watt, says Kiss. These days, prices are holding steady at $4 a watt, as booming demand for solar panels in Europe and Asia is keeping prices high at the moment, he says. But he’s encouraged by reports from solar technology developers First Solar, which is currently developing a thin-film photovoltaic cell that he says will be “approaching $1 a watt fairly soon.”

At that point, it’s unclear whether people will take to the change and how much energy solar panels will truly be able to provide, as even experts in the field cannot agree on just what can be reasonably expected of photovoltaic technology.

But it is clear that as proud as Kiss is of the energy saved by the terminal he designed, he thinks the greatest achievement he made at Coney Island was showing that large-scale,  environmentally friendly, solar-powered buildings can not only be achieved, but can be practical and economically feasible.

“The general awareness of people that ‘yes, solar is great but it belongs in space,’ or ‘it’s going to be another generation,’ it’s just a lot of stuff like that adds up to a big obstacle,” Kiss says. “But there’s no inherent reason there shouldn’t be a lot more of this. And there will be — it’s just a question of time.”

 

District of despair

For some, Washington, D.C., considered the capital of the free world by many, is all about missed opportunity.

Washington, D.C., is, to date, my greatest failure. My Waterloo. More aptly, perhaps (if you want to remain on the firm soil of American history), my Bunker Hill. 

To those unlike me, D.C. isn’t a site of lost opportunities, but instead stands tall as the capital of the free world — a shiny beacon of white, pristine hope, symbolic for those wishing to flee from tyranny and seek out more fruitful pastures. Even in the face of multiplying criticisms and America’s perceived antagonism in the arena of world politics, millions around the globe still look upon the city’s magnificent landscape and see the representation of lofty achievements and dreams that can be accomplished from very little — or, more often, nothing — returning their longing gaze. D.C., with its air of inherent optimism, is many things to many people.

But to me, it represents failure.

No, I’m not concerned about the uncertain swampland of its foundation, nor plagued by its notoriously oppressive summer heat; it’s not even the inadequacies of the fumbling judicial system that leave me feeling on edge. Rather, it’s the fact that I’ve been to this city-state four times and have yet to actually see or set foot upon anything touristy, noteworthy, historically significant, or otherwise. The Capitol Building? Washington Monument? White House? Nope. On four consecutive occasions, these tributes to democracy have eluded me with the swift, lethal precision of a top-tier CIA agent.

The first time I ventured forth into the District of Columbia was in eighth grade, when a seriously flawed plan to send 200 suburban Detroit middle-schoolers to Washington, D.C., for only one day was conceived and executed. Over the course of a single 18-hour period, every member of Anderson Middle School’s eighth-grade class piled into a charter flight, which appeared to be on par with the Wright brothers’ plane in terms of safety features, and set forth, bound for our nation’s capital. Upon landing, we spent the day learning what the district looked like from the inside of a tour bus, whizzing along at 70 miles per hour. For an uncommonly generous allotment of 45 minutes, we were allowed to teeter on the edge of Arlington National Cemetery, which was, on this particular day, roped off and closed to the public, due to an elaborate military ceremony which would probably have been interesting to watch, had we been allowed within 80 feet of it. Without any historical context for the site or ceremony imparted upon us by our chaperones, we let our inquisitive eyes fall over the closed gates, and the agenda pressed onward.

The next stop on our itinerary, naturally, included a quick interlude for some regional food at Taco Bell, followed by four hours of sitting in the lobby of the Smithsonian, waiting for the chaperones to regroup and, more than likely, figure out how to cast their charges as liars when the story of their ineptitude eventually made its way back to the parents. By the time we flew back to Detroit that evening, I was already drafting a complaint letter to my congressman about the abysmal state of public education in this country.

So it was that inaugural foray into D.C. that set the precedent for repeated disappointments. I returned to Detroit feeling angry, frustrated, deceived; utterly betrayed by what was supposed to have been a whirlwind tour full of sightseeing and wonder. As a child, I had grown up worshipping the aura of D.C.: Both of my parents were — and still are — active political junkies, and my little brother and I lived in a household where MTV was forbidden, but the personalities on Capitol Hill and National Public Radio were revered as demigods. From the time I could start stringing sentences together in my mind, I idolized political nerd-icons like John Adams, Thomas Paine, and especially the man on the money, Benjamin Franklin. In school, I continually impressed my teachers and befuddled my classmates with my ability to drop names like Newt Gingrich and Walter Mondale into casual conversation.

Washington, D.C., was therefore something I felt entitled to. It was always supposed to be mine — setting foot upon the same city where so many great leaders had lived and governed was not just my privilege, but my God-given right. Yes, to my 12-year-old self, I had been endowed by my creator with certain unalienable rights, and the most valuable of these was to visit D.C. — I was the girl who would have far preferred the license to vote over that to drive.

Years later, putting aside my battered feelings of rejection, I decided to attempt a calculated foray into D.C. again at the age of 21, but this time, on my own grown-up, self-mandated terms. My second trip to the District took place during the summer of 2006, when I traveled by Amtrak to visit a close friend who was working in the city for the National Breast Cancer Coalition as an unpaid intern. Seeing as how summertime in D.C. is about as climate-friendly as a hot tub on Mercury, we could barely manage to coax our sweat-stained flesh out of bed each morning, let alone go out and see the sights. Alas, my desperation to traverse hallowed ground could not match my lust for the arctic blast of air-conditioning. The closest encounter I had with an authentic D.C. experience occurred when Danielle, my friend’s ultra-right-wing roommate (for whom Hitler would not have been conservative enough), participated in a number of antagonistic staring matches with my Seven Sisters college-attending, rugby-playing, woman-loving friend. These showdowns happened while Danielle was in the midst of preparing to go see Sean Hannity deliver a speech — although, according to Danielle’s plaintive whines, poor Sean’s political views just didn’t make the “conservative enough” cut. (Perhaps he and the Führer could have, in an alternate universe, commiserated over beers together.)

Trip number three to D.C. only served as a stopover on the way to New York City. As I watched its tantalizing skyline rush by through the tinted windowpane of a Chinatown bus, I shook my head in disbelief that my favorite city — by proxy — was yet again slipping through my fingertips. It was like digging through an overflowing goldmine and not being able to clasp the riches within the clench of my palm. Another gold rush, vanishing into the horizon like a dreamy, beautiful mirage. I was an eager miner without a prayer.

Trip number four occurred on Groundhog Day, 2008, just after Punxsutawney Phil disappointed millions by seeing his shadow and thus selling far fewer novelty beer steins than usual. The purpose of this fourth and as yet final trip was to see two of my favorite stand-up comedians — Michael Ian Black and Michael Showalter — perform live on a double bill at a historic synagogue on I Street. While I have yet to set foot on Capitol Hill or see the likeness of the Lincoln Memorial depicted on anything other than a snow globe, I am proud to say that the historic — it’s historic! — I Street Synagogue has felt the tread of my foot and has been absorbed by my tourist’s eye. And while the evening ended on a decidedly happy note, I could not help but pay acknowledgement to the familiar sensations of disappointment and loss that always seemed to accompany any association I might have with the city itself. Yet again, I had approached the heart of D.C. only to be turned out at the last minute — an outcast lost among insiders. Perhaps it was my lot to be a continual immigrant — not crossing from one country to another, but still hoping against hope to slip through the invisible threshold undetected. For the fourth time in my scant 23 years on earth, I had found myself on the wrong side of the deportation proceedings.

Washington, D.C., has thwarted my efforts of exploration four times. Each journey leaves me feeling unfulfilled, wasted, and spent, but yet I continue to remain completely enthralled by the city’s imposing presence. It has failed me as much as I have failed it, but I somehow manage to abide by a strange sense of optimism, in the hopes that one day I will achieve my American dream and conquer the mystical city. Someday, I will make the long-overdue pilgrimage to reclaim what is mine — what has always been mine since the days of my childhood. Modern America may sport a reputation for brutish arrogance and impatient action, but perhaps those who judge us as hotheaded have forgotten that nearly a decade elapsed before independence was obtained from Britain. If our founding forefathers could wade through indecision, treason, war, and suffering, then surely I can remain faithful until the District is ready to embrace me.

These days, whenever I encounter D.C.’s iconic image, emblazoned with hope before my eyes, I turn eastward and punctuate the atmosphere with my determined fist, saying “You will be mine. Someday, you will be mine.”

 

Independents’ Day

Keli Goff’s Party Crashing: How the Hip-Hop Generation Declared Political Independence takes a look at the evolution of the African American vote.

 

In her lively and engaging book Party Crashing: How the Hip-Hop Generation Declared Political Independence, Keli Goff asserts that America’s political parties ignore the new reality of the post-civil rights generation black American voter at their peril. Citing economic and social influences that have shifted dramatically in the last 40 years or so, Party Crashing explores how a once-unified voting bloc of African Americans that may have been loyal Democrats has evolved into today’s generation of young African American adults who refuse to allow either party to take their votes for granted. While Democrats may assume they’ve got the African American vote locked up, Republicans assume the same, and the result is a population that remains disenfranchised.

Surprised by the results of a 2001 Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies poll, which showed 35 percent of African Americans aged 18 to 35 identified themselves as politically independent and 62 percent self-identified as Democrats, Goff worked with the Suffolk University Political Research Center to conduct another study in 2007. Curious as to whether the strong showing of independents in the original survey was a fluke or a reflection of real change within the black young adult community, the new poll queried 400 randomly selected African Americans, aged 18 to 45 (expanding the upper limit to include those who would have been eligible for participation in the first study). Among those asked, 35 percent of respondents 18 to 24-years-old self-identified as independent voters, and  41 percent of respondents self-identified as registered Democrats, but would not call themselves “committed Democrats.”

Intrigued by these results, Goff took her research directly to young African American adults for their thoughts on the relationship between skin color and voting preferences, and how and why it may have changed since their parents and grandparents’ generation.

Chapter by chapter, Goff examines the role of churches in African Americans’ historically strong ties to the Democratic party; the concept of black leadership in America and what that means, both within and outside the African American community; and Democratic and Republican political missteps in national, state, and local elections past. Goff complements her research study with a cultural analysis of Chris Rock’s stand-up comedy and Bill Cosby’s The Cosby Show, conversations with post-civil rights generation African American voters, and additional interviews with General Colin Powell, hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons, Bakari Kitwana (author of The Hip Hop Generation), Republican and Democratic Party officials, and more. The result is engaging, entertaining, and eye-opening.

Throughout the book, Goff returns time and again to the argument that the social and economic influences that supported young black Americans’ parents’ and grandparents’ allegiance to the Democratic Party have evolved. This generation of African Americans, born within the last 40 years, does not have the same first-hand experience with the civil rights era that their parents and grandparents had. There has been, in general, a generational shift that reflects increased tolerance of social issues, such as gay marriage. Also, the growing number of African American families in the middle and upper classes of American society has influenced their voting interests to weigh economic factors like tax policies more than ever before.

The end result is the fragmenting of a once-cohesive voting bloc. Independent-minded young African American adults are more likely to carefully question what a candidate and his or her policies can do for them instead of voting along party lines. Goff’s book demonstrates clearly that young African American voters firmly believe that candidates and parties must actively court their vote, and not just in the weeks before an election.

As with most politically oriented books, especially those published during an election cycle, the time is of the essence, and that’s true with Party Crashing. A few of the details Goff explores in her book have been resolved. For example, the contest between Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has been resolved, with Sen. Obama the presumptive Democratic nominee. However, the big picture — the fact that the votes of young black Americans, either as a group or individually, cannot be taken for granted by any candidate of either party — is a valid one, worthy of discussion for the 2008 election and beyond.