donate button

tooltip tooltip tooltip tooltip
home arrow ever green arrow Chinese pollution vs. U.S. pollution: media misses the big picture
Chinese pollution vs. U.S. pollution: media misses the big picture PDF Print Email
By Lisa Tae-Ran Schroeder
Friday, August 8, 2008

There is no escape from the frenzy of Beijing Olympics coverage. And the one thing that all the American media can't talk enough about is how polluted the city and/or country is.

There are daily haze reports, particulate meter readings, algae bloom cleanups, athletes arriving in the airport in masks, athletes training in other countries to only enter Beijing on the day of their event, etc.

China is polluted; there is no doubt about that. But the media coverage so far makes it seem like China is the only country at fault for polluting the Earth and ruining the environment.

All this pollution watch coverage doesn't deflect from the fact the United States still is one of the top per capita carbon emitters on the planet. But the media seem to overlook this and none have mentioned this in any of their reports about China's pollution.

China's population is 1.3 billion people and growing; but each person's carbon footprint is minimal compared to individual Americans. Most Americans own a car; sometimes a family owns more than one car. And most need to drive to get to work, or run errands, or even to get to spots where we can enjoy nature. We usually live in houses that consume a lot of energy from electronics like computers, flat-screen televisions, washing/drying machines, etc. A lot of rural Chinese don't have electricity or large houses or cars. Those that live in cities usually live in apartments, which use less electricity than houses, and get around by public transportation or bicycle.

But the Chinese lifestyle and country has changed over the past decades. The opening up of the economy has lifted many of its citizens out of poverty but, in return, has turned them into consumers. Many of the nouveau-riche now want cars, electronics, and other things that make their lives more comfortable, but at the cost to their environment. But why should the media criticize the Chinese for wanting and creating lifestyles that are similar to Americans at the same financial levels yet not pointing out the polluting ways of ourselves?

Foreign companies moved into China to take advantage of cheap labor and thus are directly responsible for creating factories that spew out the pollution that everyone is so critical to the Chinese about. The Chinese government is to blame because they should have put regulations in place to control the levels of toxins emitted instead of just seeing dollar signs in their eyes. But the foreign companies, many of them American, are responsible too, yet they turn a blind eye and also see only profit margins and moneymaking ability.

The media needs to dig deeper in their China pollution coverage to uncover the unpopular truths about who really is to blame and is responsible for the unfortunate environmental problems that China is dealing with now.

They would find that their coverage is hypocritical and irresponsible, especially considering all the airplane rides and energy-consumption their Olympics coverage is using up.

keeping the earth ever green

Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed
...
1464
Buy Albendazole.Buy Albendazole online. Buy Albend | September 8, 2008 | url
Media should be banned from reporting
0
How dare the media point out the pollution in Peking (it's actually just mist). Even if there is pollution it's the US fault as this article points out. If US corporations would stop exploiting the poor chinese maybe we could get back to the good old days of the people's republic. We must have faith that when the inevitable happens and China dominates the US-that the glorious leaders and people of China will destroy the US Capitalist yellow dogs.
Scott Wallace | August 13, 2008
Building on first steps
0
"Smog watch 2008" has become a topic that leaves little to the imagination. Nearly all of the major outlets are running around with hand meters, reporting the numbers, and wondering what the impact will be on an endurance athlete.

It is a process that is not just void of originality, it is doing little to actually assist the 1.3 billion of us who will continue living in the conditions.

Were reporters responsible not just for pointing fingers, but matching solutions, perhaps they would see that there are some real steps being taken. The story is not simply air pollution that will prevent world records, it is water pollution that threatens millions, poor food chains that result in massive amounts of waste, a failing health care system, and so on.

but I guess reporters will only cover what they can see, and only what is easily accessible from their 5 star hotel rooms.

the rest will be left for us to cover.

r
www.china-crossroads.com

China @ Crossroads | August 9, 2008 | url

Write comment

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
Last Updated ( Saturday, August 9, 2008 )
 
< previous   next >
in_other_words
What is a face, really? Its own photo? Its make-up? Or is it a face as painted by such or such painter? That which is in front? Inside? Behind? And the rest? Doesn't everyone look at himself in his own particular way? Deformations simply do not exist. —Pablo Picasso, Spanish artist
 
about · contact · privacy policy · donate · site map · rss rss
advertise · republishing & syndication · submissions · join staff · bugs & errors
affiliate_links

  Powells.com affiliate link  Netflix, Inc.

© 2008 InTheFray Magazine
In The Fray, Inc., is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization (EIN/tax ID number: 04-352-0135).
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.