January 2009 issue. Best of ITF 2008

donate button

tooltip tooltip tooltip tooltip
home arrow interact arrow Lead by example
Lead by example PDF Print Email
The Sean Bell case is 50 shots too many.
By Alexis Clark / Brooklyn, New York
Saturday, December 30, 2006

There was a time when I would try to stick up for police officers. My late grandfather, Warren Brown, was in law enforcement for 35 years in Cleveland, Ohio. He was a detective in the juvenile unit and was highly respected in the community he policed. As far as my own experiences, I’ve never had any altercations with cops. When I had the unfortunate experience of being mugged one night on my way to a party in Harlem, I found the investigating officers to be extremely sympathetic and professional. When I got pulled over for speeding on a few occasions, I never received an obnoxious or cold reprimand. But, unfortunately, my interactions are a far cry from those of my two brothers, my male cousins, and male friends — all of whom have something in common. They are all black men.

Sean Bell and Amadou Diallo were also black men, who were gunned down in a spray of bullets by police officers. Fifty shots were fired in Bell’s case, 41 shots in Diallo’s. How many for the next? And that question must be asked because there will definitely be another tragic killing, as long as policemen continue to perceive black males as suspects. The Diallo case is closed. It is now common knowledge that the police got it wrong when they cornered Diallo. One of the four cops who was indicted testified that Diallo had matched the profile of a wanted rapist and had reached for what they believed was a gun. It turned out to be a wallet. And Diallo, a hardworking immigrant from West Africa, was unarmed.

Although a jury acquitted all four cops in the case, New York City later reached a $3 million settlement with Diallo’s family, who had filed a wrongful death civil suit.

There are still no answers for the Bell case. In fact, it has yet to yield indictments. But what is known is that Bell was unarmed, and no weapon was found on him or in his car. We also know that one officer alone fired 31 times. There have been protests around Manhattan led by civil rights leader Reverend Al Sharpton. New York Mayor Bloomberg said in a news conference right after the shooting that the “50-odd shots fired” were “unacceptable or inexplicable” but noted the need for an investigation to “find out what really happened.”

What needs to be said is that this latest shooting death was excessive, an egregious example of police brutality by the NYPD, and an honest snapshot of the way some officers treat blacks in urban communities. Because no charges have been made yet, the identities of some of the officers involved in the Bell case have yet to be revealed. Although the cops include two blacks and a Hispanic, I fail to see the significance. Police brutality is police brutality, and whether or not an officer is black or white, there is still an unspoken trend that allows cops of all colors to get away with aggressively interacting with black males.

My grandfather policed Cleveland’s Eastside, a predominantly black, lower-income community. He investigated gang activity, picked up truants and thieves. He also drove around in an unmarked car, and he wore plain clothes. My grandfather was proud to be a detective, and he earned the respect of the community by setting an example. He was a professional, not a bully. And perhaps that’s what went awry in the cases of Amadou Diallo and Sean Bell. If the officers involved respected Diallo or Bell as human beings, not as guilty black male suspects, then maybe those men would still be alive.

My grandfather had to interact with violent youths, and he also had to turn the other cheek when the “N-word” and racial jokes were part of the everyday locker room banter. There were times when his job was stressful, dangerous, and tense. For sure, the undercover officers in the Bell case have been in stressful situations themselves. But my grandfather didn’t take his anxiety and anger out on the people he was paid to protect and to serve. He respected them. My grandfather never fired 31 shots at an unarmed person. And he never killed anyone. What a shame that the officers in the Bell and Diallo cases can’t have that track record.

Trackback(0)

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (4)

Subscribe to this comment's feed
...
0
The article makes an extremely important connection between how black male suspects are treated and how they are perceived in some ways as not-quite or less than human. How else could those sworn "to serve and protect" open fire and shoot fifty rounds at a group of unarmed black men? If the passengers of that vehicle were of any other race or gender, the scenario would have doubtlessly been different. It is shameful. Now, I am awaiting the findings of the grand jury. It will be a tragedy if our system of justice allows another black man to be a victim of police britality without any consequences for police officers who actually committed murder. I appreciate the efforts of the author and everyone else who have spoken out against this - our society has to understand that we will not accept this blatant disregard of human life.
Tiombe | January 7, 2007
...
0
This is a great assessment of the current state of police relations in our country. The article makes a great point that racism is not necessarily about the color of one's skin; it is the perception that one class is superior to another. Police brutality and excessive force are an expression of racism that should not tolerated on any level. As another reader mentioned, police officers should be reminded that they should protect and serve their community with dignity and respect. Police officers should remember that regardless of their profession, they are human beings with the same skin color of so many good and not-so-good members of our society.
Rachelle | January 5, 2007
...
0
Ms. Clark makes excellent points in the article that her grandfather earned the respect of the community that he served. I'm not sure that police officers today still recognize that they are hired to serve and protect the community. All of these acts of brutality against men of color are not about such basic principles; there seems to be a different mindset today that police have all the power, and the black/latino communities are powerless and therefore not deserving of the same treatment and respect as white communities. Somehow, we must reverse this thinking and require that those in uniform must live and breathe the community that they serve, and essentially know and recognize everyone as human beings and not merely as a profiled target.
Yolanda | January 4, 2007
Lead By Example
0
Good observation of law enforcement today. Your grandfather policed during a time when there was honor within the ranks, a man's life was important and blatant police brutality was unacceptable. Until grand juries are comprised of "juries of your peers," we will alwys have blacks living under the threat of unlawful police violence perpetrated against them and later ruled by grand juries as "within the scope of their duties." Racism in law enforcement, often exhibited through fear and "protected" violence, is in the fabric of America. When will white men feel non threatened by non whites ...I don't know! But, until that day, this is our justice system! Yes, this is a sad commentary.
jennifer | January 2, 2007

Write comment

This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, January 4, 2007 )
 
< previous   next >
in_other_words
Freedom makes a huge requirement of every human being. With freedom comes responsibility. For the person who is unwilling to grow up, the person who does not want to carry his own weight, this is a frightening prospect. —Eleanor Roosevelt, former First Lady
 
about · contact · privacy policy · donate · site map · rss rss
advertise · republishing & syndication · submissions · join staff · bugs & errors
affiliate_links

  Powells.com affiliate link  Netflix, Inc.

© 2009 InTheFray Magazine
In The Fray, Inc., is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization (EIN/tax ID number: 04-352-0135).
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.