donate button

tooltip tooltip tooltip tooltip
home arrow blogs

InTheFray Blogs

The blogs of InTheFray Magazine.

Friday, July 03, 2009

Ask Ms. Turnstiles

It's time for another installment of Ask Ms. Turnstiles, where all of your burning questions about the New York City subway system are answered. Let's get down to business.      

Q: I heard that the cost of the subway fares increased this week. What gives?

A: Since you asked, this is the perfect opportunity to review the numbers: $2.25 = New cost of a single subway ride.

1 million = Number of curses you will receive from the Chinese Curses Lady if you talk on the subway.

4 = Times per week a conductor will close the doors in your face.

45 = Number of sick passengers per week.

0 = Number of other options you have to get to work.      

 

Q: Is it true that Ruth Madoff, Bernie's wife, was spotted riding the subway last week?  

A: Why, yes! Ms. Turnstiles thinks it's heartwarming to know that she's just one of us.    

 

Q: Ms. Turnstiles, why does one subway car feel like a meat locker and the car right next to it feels like the rainforest?  

A: You may have heard the recent news that New York City has earned the honorable distinction of being this country's safest big city. (City motto: We're glad we're not Detroit.) This hard-won achievement doesn't come without a no-holds-barred crackdown on things that put Gothamites at risk. After ridding the city of the dangerous criminal known as Trans-Fats and moving the menace to society called "Smoker" to back alleyways, Mayor Bloomberg has set his sights on arming you with the tools to avoid becoming a statistic. Here's how it works: You board the train and realize it's so humid you feel like you're breathing through a wet rag. Then you dash at breakneck speed to get to the next car before the doors close. After a few weeks of commuting, you'll be able to outrun any mugger. Thanks, Mayor Mike!     

 

Q: The woman sitting next to me is falling asleep and resting her head on my shoulder. Should I shake her awake? She's starting to snore.  

A: Ms. Turnstiles understands your predicament. She has been in this situation herself and take it from her, shaking the woman will only serve to have her snuggle closer to you. To remedy the problem, simply sprits a lot of perfume under her nose. You'll instantly create your own personal space and make you smell like you just left a cheap whorehouse, which serves as an added benefit of keeping your boss out of your cube for the rest of the day. It's a win-win situation.    

 

 Q: According to the television documentary, "Life After People," the entire subway system will rot and collapse five years after people are gone from the earth. What do you make of that?  

A: Ms. Turnstiles will answer your question with another question: If a subway system collapses and no one is around to witness it, why do you care?    

 

Q: Does your snarkiness on this subject have anything to do with the fact that you briefly dated one of the programmers for this show?  

A: Ms. Turnstiles won't dignify this question with a response, but if she did, she would have to point out, yet again, that the entire premise of the show is ridiculous. What tragedy could possibly elminate all 6 billion people on this planet simultaneously yet not harm any domesticated or wild animals? Or any vegetation? Or not damage any of the existing infrastructure? Put that in your pipe and smoke it bub.    

There you have it, Straphangers. Another informative and helpful edition of Ask Ms. Turnstiles. Until next time, when she will be taking more of your important questions, stand clear of the closing doors.


Wednesday, July 01, 2009

If I don't know, I don't care (?)

 

But in a lot of other cities that isn't the case. Even after some streets are named Mulberry Street or Circle Drive or what have you, they are then again renamed in tribute and honor of someone important to that neighborhood or community. This makes sense right?

Now, I don't know the logistics of street naming and how it's decided on or denied by, but I do know of a few streets around here (Staten Island) named after firefighters lost in 9/11 and soldiers killed while on duty in the Middle East. A suggestion like that probably wouldn't get much backlash, if any. I mean, if someone did object, that would probably automatically paint a target on that person's back as an inconsiderate, unfeeling bastard. At least, I feel like that would be the case. 

According to NBC Los Angeles, there is a street in California called Moneta Avenue that might be renamed after José Rizal, a Philippine historical figure and national hero who helped fight against colonial Spain (to learn more about him, refer to Wikipedia for the quickest facts). Right away there is controversy over whether it would be appropriate to name a street after him because supposedly barely anyone in the community knows who he is. 

In addition, it's not as though that community is predominantly made up of Filipinos. Reports out of LA say that the area is pretty evenly divided in terms of ethnic enclaves.

But I wonder...what's the harm? Is anyone so against such a thing? The article says that people don't want to go through the hassle of changing their "addresses and identities." Excuse me, what does a street name have to do with your identity? Is there something that I'm missing? 

If people here can honor the life of a soldier or a firefighter, why can't people honor the life of someone who, too, fought for freedom and justice? Besides, aren't people naming buildings and institutions after past presidents and Martin Luther King, Jr.? Could it be we have a problem recognizing the accomplishments of people who aren't American?

I don't really know what the big deal is, but maybe you do? 


It was last week Thursday, around midnight, that I logged onto my Facebook account, before tucking myself into a four-layered cave of warmth, and found myself gaping at one of my friend's status updates. It simply said, "Michael Jackson is dead. WTH???" Six hours later, 95 of my Facebook friends had updated theirs statuses in honor of Jackson, either confessing their love, expressing their condolences, or simply stating their level of shock.

This blog post is not about Jackson's sudden death because (like Elvis Presley, Kurt Cobain, Tupac Shakur, and Shakespeare) Michael Jackson will never truly die, no matter how much some people wish that he would. Still, MJ's death saddens me; he reminds me of Edward in Tim Burton's Edward Scissorhands, a lonely innocent corrupted by the world. That's just my opinion. Jackson tried to change the world with his music and now that he is dead, he has become yet another commodity. The world wants everything that they can get of him now that he is gone CD and DVD demands have increased, soon there will be new books on the "life and times of Michael Jackson," along with t-shirts, stationery, costumes, and sweets. Eventually there will be a movie, then Happy Meal promotions and Michael Jackson dolls...Because that's just the way that the media works.

The workings of the media is what inspired this post. No matter how much you may think that you hate the media, it is everywhere and all you can do is find a way to use it without letting it use you. The Internet changes communication completely, allowing communication to exceed boundaries in a way that was unimaginable a few decades back. People now communicate to the masses from behind their computer screens, laptops, or mobile phones, making the world one gigantic Hyde Park. Relationships form with a joint cause, attracting support across physical borders so that the world can be heard as one voice and, hopefully, that voice will finally be big enough to bring about change for the better.

Within a couple of hours, the news of Jackson's death spread across the world...Therefore, a couple of hours would theoretically be all one needs to heal the world. The world is not as big as it used to be; with our connectedness there is no excuse for the continuance of war, famine, human rights violations, and intolerance. All one has to do is care.


 

As someone who periodically posts in blogs I should probably be the last person to admit that I'm not actually a fervent blog follower let alone a fervent follower of vlogs. And despite the fact that I've always had an enormous respect for rap and hip-hop artists, actually following hip-hop blogs has never been something on the forefront on my day-to-day radar.

But pushing all my ill-formed daily habits and tendencies aside, I'd like to bring up  an intriguing hip-hop vlog that I recently stumbled upon: "The Ill Doctrine" (http://www.illdoctrine.com/), run by John Randolph, founder of New York's longest running hip-hop radio show, "The Underground" on WBAI, and who more commonly goes by the name Jay Smooth.

Perhaps what's most  unusual about this hip-hop blog is that it's not just about hip-hop. Well sort of. Wait...

Like the more politically charged subject matter of his topic of choice, Smooth uses his video blog to critically address the often charged issues of race, feminism, and homophobia by posting videos that consistently address his nuanced take on these issues in a meaningful and humorously engaging way.

Not one to be exclusionary in his critiques, Smooth often turns his eye towards his own hip-hop community, criticizing artists such as Charles Hamilton, and includes posts such as "An Old Person's Guided to No Homo," which takes a look a hip-hop's often homophobic content.

In the end, perhaps one of the most endearing aspect of Smooth's work is the fact that rather than focusing on directing content towards or against anybody's agenda, Smooth simply wants to be part of the global conversation.

As he recently told NPR's "All Things Considered," "I try to set an example for being kind to people, and critiquing them while still being aware of their humanity." And in today's world where people are constantly interested in promoting their own agendas, that's a bit refreshing, isn't it?

Check out his work at:

http://www.illdoctrine.com/ and http://www.hiphopmusic.com/ 

 

 

 

 

 


Monday, June 29, 2009

Old friends

Until, that is, I spot a familiar face on the street carrying a baby and realize that the little girl with wild hair and who always walked on her tip-toes, the one I used to ride bikes with and lived a few streets away from, is now a mother, has a husband, a house, and a career. She’s all grown up, or at least, she’s come a long way since we were ten.

It’s incredible stuff. I suppose it’s easy to get lost in the everyday momentum of life; enjoying each moment means that there isn’t always time to realize what’s changing. For me it’s about living in the present. I don't want regrets or excessive reminiscing holding me back from moving forward. The past is there inside me, but I try not to dwell on it too much.

So when someone asks, "What’s new?” I have trouble finding an answer. It’s all new, but being in the thick of things can make that hard to remember.

Old friends are a good reminder. It’s a taste of the past with a surprise of how things have changed. I'm amazed at what people achieve and how much they've grown. And when they ask me, "how are you doing?" I actually stop and realize that yeah, a lot has happened since we’ve last met.

Anyhow, that’s what’s on my mind. Old friends and the way life moves on. Things always change, and I have no regrets over that. But it’s nice to look back occasionally, catch up on a street corner while the light turns green to red, stay for a drink after saying hello at a bar, or whatever it is that brings people together. It’s good to realize how far we’ve all come.


Thursday, June 25, 2009

Transcending Jackie Chan

 

It's not hard to understand why the market for foreign films here in America isn't booming. It's not like independent foreign movies are selling out across the country. We like our typical roles just fine, don't we? The blonde bimbo, the Indian deli-owner, and the dragon-fanatic, karate-expert, math-genius Asian. 

I will admit that I don't know very much about Asian/Asian-American film. But because I was lucky enough to attend a few screenings as part of the New York Asian Film Festival (NYAFF), I've grown to really appreciate the Asian characters from the perspective of...Asian directors, producers, actors, audiences.

The NYAFF, which is brought to life by Subway Cinemas, features over 50 films, most of which were "hits" in many countries like Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Personally, I believe these films represent the truest of Asian life and experiences. This doesn't mean that all the movies have to do "Asian themes," like studying hard or being picked last in P.E. class. These Asian films celebrate life as simply as possible: being human.

The characters in many of NYAFF's films struggle with love and relationships, money and mishap, crazy shenanigans and late-night bar fights.  There isn't something overtly Asian about any of the films, nor did they try to be what they weren't (big-budget Western blockbusters). There was an honesty and a sincere desire to remain true to everyday life and the art of film-making. 

It's refreshing to not have to watch the same archetypes played over and over again. But this summer doesn't just have NYAFF (which ends in about a week). The IndioBravo Film Foundation brought the first Filipino Film festival a couple of weeks ago. Next month the Asian American International Film Festival (AAIFF) will take place over the course of three days, bringing to the screens some of the most organically-sound and independent Asian-American films.

It's very important to support festivals like these because they offer an alternative to the norm. And sometimes not just an alternative, but the reality.

Disney's Mulan was sort of on the right track. So whaddya say? Give the Rush Hour movies a rest, at least for a while.  


Thursday, June 25, 2009

Do actions speak louder than Twitters?

 

Apparently a popular equation online amidst Iran's election has been "Tiananmen + Twitter = Tehran," which obviously places a heavy emphasis on the idea that twittering (or tweeting) has rounded up hundreds and thousands of people behind those protesting Iranians who feel robbed of their voices with the supposed re-election of Ahmadinejad.

It's true- everyday I receive at least 10 Twitter updates referring to online petitions I can sign, graphic icons I can create, and listservs I can join, all to show my support. Sometimes as I'm scrolling through them, I feel an indescribable sense of community, as if simply by reading I am declaring "Yes! I'm with you!" But to be honest, the sensation is fleeting.

Maybe it is the cynic in me, maybe it is the fact that I'm still not super Web-savvy like some of my peers (I only have 22 followers on Twitter after posting over 50 updates what am I doing wrong here?), but sometimes I can't help but still feel detached and skeptical about all of this hoopla on the Internet.

The first step to recognizing a problem is to be informed of it, of course, but what comes next? If all I do is read news updates every few hours and maybe link to them through Facebook, Twitter, or some other online social networking site, how much good does that do?  I may reach a fair amount of people, promoting awareness both to myself and others, but URLs don't necessarily perform the same functions as actually taking to the streets and rallying.

Or do they?

This past week, The Washington Post published an analysis of the above equation, posing a lot of my same concerns. Could it be that the Web has so changed the world, that much of our faith in activism can rely on blogging and reaching one another through the Internet? Is it safe to say that 1,000 online supporters will translate to 1,000 marching supporters?

Simple copy and pasting, RTing (retweeting), and forwarding somehow seems to me like it's taken the place of physical action and movement (you know, the kind you do with the whole of your body, not just your fingers) outside (as opposed to in a dark corner in your room or hunched over your iPhone). Also, I don't know how I feel about the quality of "news." With the constant need to be posting every 10 minutes (since "old news" seems to be anything three hours old), I've been reading some really random stuff. Interesting? Maybe. Newsworthy? Probably not. You can Twitter all day long and all you'll be left with is a public timeline with a million updates. 

It's easy to click a hyperlink, it's a little harder to leave our computer screens.

(An original and shorter version of this article was written for Asians in America Magazine, where I am the managing editor.) 


Thursday, June 25, 2009

Twitter gets political

Accessibility is definitely an area where Twitter has Facebook beat, and in the case of Iran its consequences are powerful. News agents are looking to Twitter and other social networking sites like YouTube to find their reports. And while these sources may not be confirmed, it’s nevertheless a constant stream of opinions and experiences.

Looking at Twitter and clicking on a discussion titled #iranelection – there have been 219 new comments added since I logged in (5 minutes ago). That is incredible. People are discussing protests, closures, incidences, reactions, experiences, and more. One tweeter writes encouragement for others to contribute and keep Iran at the top of Twitter’s discussion list. They’re using this medium to ensure that their struggles are not forgotten, and it seems to be working.

I just checked again, and there are now 440 more comments since I began this blog post.

I can only imagine how the Internet may have impacted past protests and revolutions had it been available, but that’s speculating on something we can never know.

However, today it seems quite clear that sites like Twitter and YouTube are having an impact within Iran and internationally. They’re inspiring hope, discussion, strategy, and motivation. If the rapid addition of tweets to this single feed is any indication, Iranians have managed to involve people from all over the world in their fight. While the resolution is still unsettled, it’s clear that the people of Iran are making themselves heard. And that’s pretty incredible stuff.

One last check – there’s now 1,717 comments added since I first went to the page. Wow.

P.S. See the blog Iran protest resources if you want to read more on Iran.


Thursday, June 25, 2009

Iran protest resources

 

Why we protest: A forum with updates on rallies, missing persons, videos, and pictures of events.

Iranian: Website with protest pictures, the latest news, and updates from the ground. Has English and Farsi sections.

Iranian Woman: An Iranian woman blogs about life in today's Iran, in English and Farsi.

Feministing has an interesting article on the role of women in ongoing unrest in Iran.

I will post more links in the days to come.

Meanwhile, a CNN news update says that the planned opposition rally has been delayed in Iran after a government crackdown:

"The opposition had called for a ceremony to remember the victims of Iran's post-election protests, but Wednesday night, the Web site of defeated presidential candidate Mehdi Karrubi's party announced it would be delayed. The site did not offer an alternate date."

Commentators are now suggesting that the protesters have lost some momentum because of the government's harsh crackdown and intimidation techniques. And the delayed rally also hints towards that, but it is also true that daily nighttime protest, where people shout "god is great" on rooftops, is going on without fail.


Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Help a sister out

You ever had one of those rough days at work where the only thing you can mentally or physically manage after leaving the office is plugging in your earphones and choosing the song "Take This Job and Shove It" on your iPod?

Today was one of those days.

The good thing about riding the subway in a situation like this is that, if the trains aren't too crowded, I can actually decompress on the way home. The same cannot be said about sitting white-knuckled in bumper-to-bumper traffic breathing exhaust fumes. And as luck would have it, a seat opened up just as I was boarding the 2 train. I leaned my head against the wall, closed my eyes and went to my happy place.

There is a certain lulling quality to the rhythm of the train, especially when it builds up speed in the tunnel under the East River. (See "Cure Insomnia, Save the World" post.) So I was a little surprised and embarrassed, when I squinted one eyelid open to make sure that I wasn't somewhere in Bed-Stuy (which, if I'm being honest with you, I have done before), to be eye-to-bellybutton with a ginormous pregnant woman.

How long had she been standing over me secretly coveting my seat, her aching back and swollen feet longing for some relief? I got up quickly and she seemed grateful rather than annoyed at my obliviousness. After my self-satisfaction at helping my fellow neighbor wore off, I wondered why no one else in the vicinity had offered his or her seat.

That brings me to the unspoken subway code outlining who should get a seat, which I thought was well ingrained into the commuter's psyche:

  • Pregnant women, if they are obviously pregnant.
  • The elderly, but not just your average AARP member. We're talking white hair and possibly a cane. Sixty is the new 40.
  • Anyone of any age who is infirm. This includes crutches, blind with walking sticks, and neck braces.
  • A parent who is carrying a baby or has a baby strapped in a snugly. Not applicable if the child is in a stroller.

Not having ridden mass transit while pregnant, I decided to conduct an informal and highly subjective survey from the test group called Women I Know. I'm sad to report that apparently pregnant women end up standing more often than not. There is the understandable awkwardness of trying to decide if a woman in early stages of pregnancy is indeed with child or just, how can I say this gracefully, Rubenesque. But I was amazed to learn about the blatant disregard for weary travelers.

Of the hundreds of rides taken by my respondents while pregnant, they each could count on one hand the number of times a seat was immediately offered, and of the occasions they were given a seat, the generosity was bestowed either by a man of color or a teenager. (Teens do have a conscience...) Evidently white men rank lowest on the list of seat-giver-uppers, and women of all colors are not far behind. (Come on, women, help a sister out!)

One noteworthy incident involved a ride on the Metro North commuter train during which a woman was saving two seats on either side for her friends. Facing the prospect of standing for a 40-minute ride, my very pregnant friend asked for a seat to no avail. Finally a woman tucked into a corner relinquished hers, causing my friend to squeeze in front of several other people to get to it. The train doors closed with the "saved" seats still available.

Not long ago some Columbia University sociology students conducted a subway experiment. They had to approach seated New Yorkers, look them in the eye and ask them to give up their seats without any explanation. This, I think, is third on the list of things most feared right after public speaking and death. But here's the kicker: with very few exceptions, every person gave up their seat, no questions asked! Whether the students were tailed home and given a once-over, was not reported in the results.


<< start < previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next > end >>
in_other_words
Understanding is a two-way street. —Eleanor Roosevelt, former First Lady
 
about · contact · privacy policy · donate · rss feeds rss feeds
advertise · republishing & syndication · submissions · join staff · bugs & errors
affiliate_links
© 2009 InTheFray Magazine
In The Fray, Inc., is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization (EIN/tax ID number: 04-352-0135).
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.